Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think if the title were correct it would be more credible.
I read the article yesterday and it did not say that the attacker was related to this woman and I did not see in the article you linked that they were related unless I missed it.
It is shameful that people do things like this to each other but some people just cannot handle the reality of life and blame others and take it out on them.
As I said in the OP's other thread on the same topic:
Quote:
From the information available in the report you've linked to, your thread starts with fact (that a woman was beheaded in North London), then goes on to attempt to pass off rumour as fact (the report states that 'Some residents claimed last night that the suspect was a local man who had converted to Islam last year, but those claims could not be verified'), before finishing with something you've plucked from thin air (that the killer was the victim's son - something of which there is no mention in the Telegraph report).
I would ask - what THE HELL gives you the right to co-opt a tragic incident in which a woman has been brutally murdered in a shoddy attempt to advance your own pathetic agenda?
The Telegraph story also mentions witness reports of the man ranting about (and beheading) a cat, and attacking garden plants - which would seem to strongly suggest severe mental disturbance, rather than religious fundamentalism. I really cannot put into words the level of contempt I in which I hold people, like the OP of this thread, who hijack tragic events in an effort to manufacture social discord. Bravo to all on this thread who have called him/her out.
The article states directly it was a completely random attack: "....was killed outside her home in Edmonton in a random but frenzied assault by a 25-year-old. Witnesses said they saw the man, wielding a foot-long blade, attack a passing vehicle and a cat before roaming back gardens looking for a victim.
OP, you should be ashamed of yourself, and quite stupid assuming no one here could actually read the link. Get the attention you were seeking??
I wonder if the real story was that an ISIS-inspired Muslim had done the beheading but the title of the post did not mention the religion we'd get 6 replies in an hour berating the OP why he had NOT mentioned that the killer was a Muslim.
I wonder if the real story was that an ISIS-inspired Muslim had done the beheading but the title of the post did not mention the religion we'd get 6 replies in an hour berating the OP why he had NOT mentioned that the killer was a Muslim.
What are you talking about?? OP outright lied in his thread title and description in order to make it sound more juicy or something.
Excuse me, the title is an outright lie. Why is it still here?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
