Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-11-2014, 08:28 PM
 
1,259 posts, read 828,746 times
Reputation: 142

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I was an idea, not a bill.
When politician has an idea it translates into legislation, a bill.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Despite that we are now agreeing that OTC doesn't mean not covered by insurance.

At the present time OTC means not covered by insurance. Can you finally get that?


From your own link:

"We found that even the groups that advocate making the pill available over the counter — like Jessica Arons, president and CEO of the Reproductive Health Technologies Project and Dan Grossman, vice president for research at Ibis Reproductive Health — did not believe it was a cheaper alternative for consumers than requiring insurance companies to cover contraceptives without cost sharing."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-11-2014, 08:32 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by random_thoughts View Post
At the present time OTC means not covered by insurance. Can you finally get that?
Sorry, posted earlier where OTC drugs are covered by insurance, get up to speed.


Quote:
"We found that even the groups that advocate making the pill available over the counter — like Jessica Arons, president and CEO of the Reproductive Health Technologies Project and Dan Grossman, vice president for research at Ibis Reproductive Health — did not believe it was a cheaper alternative for consumers than requiring insurance companies to cover contraceptives without cost sharing."
Never mind they aren't adding in the doctors visit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2014, 08:36 PM
 
1,259 posts, read 828,746 times
Reputation: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Sorry, posted earlier where OTC drugs are covered by insurance, get up to speed.
You posted about ONE insurance company lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2014, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
If the choice is between the medical community and the government, I'll go with the medical community. Your argument is with the medical community, not me.
The "medical community", of which I am a part, is saying women should use a self-screening tool. The ACOG IS a part of the "medical" community. What part of this do you not understand?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2014, 03:17 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by random_thoughts View Post
You posted about ONE insurance company lol
As that is all I have to provide to show that it is done. That does not mean only one does it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2014, 03:21 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
The "medical community", of which I am a part, is saying women should use a self-screening tool. The ACOG IS a part of the "medical" community. What part of this do you not understand?
What I understand is the American Congress of OBGYN's says women are perfectly capable of doing that and using OTC birth control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2014, 05:49 AM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,447 posts, read 4,752,145 times
Reputation: 15354
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
several studies have shown that women can self-screen

Seems that the medical community has more faith in women than you do.
What we're seeing here is the end game behind the dumbing down of our education that is supported by many big statists. The assumption that it is unreasonable to expect people to self screen only has merit when you are dealing with an uneducated and functionally illiterate population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2014, 06:00 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Bully View Post
What we're seeing here is the end game behind the dumbing down of our education that is supported by many big statists. The assumption that it is unreasonable to expect people to self screen only has merit when you are dealing with an uneducated and functionally illiterate population.
To be clear, I'm not the one labelling women that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2014, 06:32 AM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,507,037 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
@pknopp: You. do. not. understand. what. self-screen. means!

Accuracy of Self-Screening for Contraindications to Combined Oral Contraceptive Use
Self-screening for contraindications to oral contraceptives using a medical checklist is relatively accurate. Unaided screening is inaccurate and reflects common misperceptions about the safety of oral contraceptives. Over-the-counter provision of this method would likely be safe, especially for younger women and if independent blood pressure screening were encouraged.

If you read the footnotes of the ACOG statement, they refer to screening questionnaires as "self-screening". That means: screening the woman does herself using a "medical checklist".

FROM THE LINK!
Grossman D, Fernandez L, Hopkins K, Amastae J, Garcia SG, Potter JE. Accuracy of self-screening for contraindications to combined oral contraceptive use. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:572–8. [PubMed] [Obstetrics & Gynecology] ⇦
Doshi JS, French RS, Evans HE, Wilkinson CL. Feasibility of a self-completed history questionnaire in women requesting repeat combined hormonal contraception. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008;34:51–4. [PubMed] [Full Text] ⇦

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is it your point that women don't have the smarts to do self-screening ? Don't have access to a medical checklist ? Will not consult with a doctor before using bc ?

The insurance vs. not insured is a clear issue. Your fixation on self-screening is not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2014, 06:44 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
Is it your point that women don't have the smarts to do self-screening ? Don't have access to a medical checklist ? Will not consult with a doctor before using bc ?

The insurance vs. not insured is a clear issue. Your fixation on self-screening is not.
No. My point is that the ACOG is NOT recommending you be able to buy BCP like condoms, or bubble gum. My point is they're recommending selling them w/o a prescription but WITH the screening. Yikes! How many posts did that take.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top