Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-11-2014, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
You are right, War has a technical definition defined by US Code and law.

However, lets not play coy either, you no what i mean when i saw war. And you also know my post is true. Blaming the president because the military doesnt have a plan is moronic.
Where did I ever blame the President ?

The military would never admit to the press that they didn't have a plan.
They would go with "no comment".
But Obama is the one that told the world we have no plan.
And he is the Commander in Chief, is he not ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-11-2014, 03:54 PM
 
2,253 posts, read 2,521,545 times
Reputation: 1526
the UK and Germany already did enough to contribute to the cluster known as the middle east.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2014, 04:24 PM
 
6,022 posts, read 7,829,350 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
I can't believe O wants to give arms to the opposition. That's the biggest failure waiting to happen. They take the weapons and become a new rebel faction and fight against us.

Such a foolish proposition.
Im not sure if you just woke up but just last year many republicans were saying we must arm Isis against Assad. This is what happens when you play both sides of the fence, and this is US foreign policy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2014, 04:29 PM
 
Location: Lewes, Delaware
3,490 posts, read 3,792,465 times
Reputation: 1953
Quote:
Originally Posted by city414 View Post
Im not sure if you just woke up but just last year many republicans were saying we must arm Isis against Assad. This is what happens when you play both sides of the fence, and this is US foreign policy
Seems to me that just about everything we do in the ME is a cluster ****, this won't be any different.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2014, 04:32 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 23 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,551 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6040
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Where did I ever blame the President ?

The military would never admit to the press that they didn't have a plan.
They would go with "no comment".
But Obama is the one that told the world we have no plan.
And he is the Commander in Chief, is he not ?
I didnt say you blamed the President, but you chose to respond to my comment.

You can either agree or disagree, but arguing the definition of war, was arbitrary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2014, 04:46 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,544,279 times
Reputation: 6392
Obomber is now directly challenging the Chinese, though I'm sure the Bots are blissfully unaware of that.

Stay tuned for more blowback.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2014, 05:15 PM
 
6,022 posts, read 7,829,350 times
Reputation: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Obomber is now directly challenging the Chinese, though I'm sure the Bots are blissfully unaware of that.

Stay tuned for more blowback.
Its funny you mention the term blowback....Alot of blowing we're recieving today are from a result of the 80's but let's just act like it isn't true!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2014, 05:18 PM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,489,598 times
Reputation: 16962
Quote:
Originally Posted by wxjay View Post
Wait, Obama said he had no strategy to fight ISIS like last week. Now he has a strategy?

And why is this administration so scared to use the words Radical Islam? Because that is what this terror group is - Radical Islamists who want to topple governments and set up a theocratic dictatorship throughout the Middle East.
Radical Islamists

Get Bin Ladin and Al Queda is still around. Bolo Harem kidnaps 300 women and is ignored. Kill ISIS in Iraq or Syria and they will spring up elsewhere.

They take on these names like so many toys out of the CrackerJack boxes of yore. You cannot fight a war against ideology and fanaticism; you merely "feed the beast".

When or if they see they're losing a battle they'll simply beat feet to a friendly country to settle down and plan another strategy, pick another name and start cutting off heads all over again.

Let Iraq stew in a soup of ISIS making them dance to a whole new era of radical islam; it might teach them something worthwhile. Let Syria resolve it's rebellion itself, either way.

Creation of Nato and the U.N. was not intended to supplant self reliance with dependence on others.

You keep stoking these fires then commence to running around like Smokey the Bear after. A terrible waste of resources and manpower not to mention taxpayer's money.

Force them to shoulder their burdens or suffer the consequences of forever being called upon to intercede in tribal strife.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2014, 05:51 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,118,333 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goinback2011 View Post
Obomber is now directly challenging the Chinese, though I'm sure the Bots are blissfully unaware of that.

Stay tuned for more blowback.
Is their million man army going to cross the pacific or are they close to having a blue water navy to actually challenge the US?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2014, 06:07 PM
 
9,879 posts, read 8,018,970 times
Reputation: 2521
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
Is their million man army going to cross the pacific or are they close to having a blue water navy to actually challenge the US?
Seriously now. Want a war with China too.
This should be laughable, if it wasn't so sad, that
folks actually contemplate these type of scenarios.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top