Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Are you serious? Your Messiah has been covering up investigations against his criminal activities since 2010. Remember "Fast & Furious?" That is all liberal freaks ever do - cover up their criminal activity. Obama is certainly no exception.
Obviously you have utterly no clue what is going on, just like when you voted for your criminal Messiah - TWICE!
Since you have such a solid handle on this, please explain why it is that the powerful GOP investigators are utterly unable to prove any of their allegations.
Especially all this blabber about cover-ups.
Go ahead. But please come up with something more substantial than right wing opinion pieces.
Lol @ you holding Reagan in the same esteem as T.R.
What esteem ? TR's body wasn't even cold before congress went back into session to enact term limits
for Presidents. 4 terms ? The TR broke constitutional laws (like the War Powers Act) every time he didn't get his way. Ever heard of the "Lusitania" ? How about the Panama Canal debacle ? ect ect. Im not saying
He wasn't great, but, he had a fault or two...... back on topic....
Of course they were shredding Benghazi documents, She had to cover it all up. Would you trust anything
She said ? Don't think I would......
Since you have such a solid handle on this, please explain why it is that the powerful GOP investigators are utterly unable to prove any of their allegations.
Especially all this blabber about cover-ups.
Go ahead. But please come up with something more substantial than right wing opinion pieces.
What part of "If your Criminal-In-Chief had provided the information requested by the committee when asked, this investigation would have been over long ago" were you not able to comprehend?
Without the requested documents the committee is unable to prove any allegation one way or the other, which is why the investigation continues.
Tell your Messiah to cough up the requested documents and stop stalling.
What part of "If your Criminal-In-Chief had provided the information requested by the committee when asked, this investigation would have been over long ago" were you not able to comprehend?
Without the requested documents the committee is unable to prove any allegation one way or the other, which is why the investigation continues.
Tell your Messiah to cough up the requested documents and stop stalling.
Which requested documents is the White House not giving up?
What esteem ? TR's body wasn't even cold before congress went back into session to enact term limits
for Presidents. 4 terms ? The TR broke constitutional laws (like the War Powers Act) every time he didn't get his way. Ever heard of the "Lusitania" ? How about the Panama Canal debacle ? ect ect. Im not saying
He wasn't great, but, he had a fault or two...... back on topic....
Of course they were shredding Benghazi documents, She had to cover it all up. Would you trust anything
She said ? Don't think I would......
First, it was Franklin Delano Roosevelt that served almost 4 terms, not his uncle Teddy. Theodore Roosevelt served almost 2 terms.
Second, at the time FDR ran for President, there was no constitutional limitation on the number of terms a President may serve. George Washington established the tradition of serving no more than two terms. However, it was not codified into law until the Twenty-Second Amendment was ratified in 1951.
Third, Theodore Roosevelt could not have possibly violated the War Powers Act of 1973 since he had been dead for 54 years before it was enacted into law.
Fourth, the RMS Lusitania was sunk in 1915, when Woodrow Wilson was President, not either Roosevelt.
Fifth, the "Panama Canal debacle" was by the French, who started building the canal in 1875 but could not complete it. By 1889 all work on the canal by the French stopped, and France lost $262 million (in 1889 dollars). The US took control of finishing the canal from the French in 1904 and it was completed in 1913.
I think you need to brush up on your American history.
What part of "If your Criminal-In-Chief had provided the information requested by the committee when asked, this investigation would have been over long ago" were you not able to comprehend?
Without the requested documents the committee is unable to prove any allegation one way or the other, which is why the investigation continues.
Tell your Messiah to cough up the requested documents and stop stalling.
Talk to Darrel Issa. You know, the GOP's favorite Muslim.
What part of "how come the investigating committee keeps making allegations of a cover-up, yet is utterly incapable of substantiating it?" are you having such a hard time with?
The way this works in America is that the burden of proof rests with the accuser. Been like that for over two centuries. If you claim something happened, you have to have evidence to back it up. Along those lines, withholding evidence is a felony and an impeachable offense. Otherwise, it's nothing more than name-calling, which is all that's come out of any of these so-called "scandals" that get the haters up and barking like Pavlov dogs.
Tell your Pharisees to do something about it instead of whine in front of microphones. If there's any substance to what they claim, then they should be able to get a truckload of indictments. They're big boys. They know the procedure.
The reality is that after years of investigating, they've come up with nothing.
But like I said, it sure sells with those who'd like to see a lynching.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.