Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 09-18-2014, 07:04 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 63,862,710 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by daylux View Post
Those are good points. She tried to discuss the incident, but Rosie was fixed on her attack and not thinking rationally. Rosie's bloviating will discourage any reasonable discussion. I don't see any conservative lasting on that show.
Didnt Rosie also say that steel doesnt melt, in relationship to 911?
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-18-2014, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,857,699 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by FKD19124 View Post
and I realize she has a new "wife"? when did she spilt with her first? I thought homosexuals were monogamous?
You mean like heterosexuals are
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 08:29 AM
 
21,395 posts, read 10,448,543 times
Reputation: 14059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
Rosie was only amusing when she was fawning over Tom Cruise, the early years.

Even that turned to ash since he's and idiot and she never should have been promoted past "celebrity crush interviews".
Actually, I quite liked that Rosie with her talk show and compassion and charity. She got weird later, or maybe it was she stopped acting and starting being herself? Not sure, but she's really gone off the deep end now. She's passionate about her beliefs, which I can respect. But she's not nice and compassionate anymore, and everything is black and white with her. She used to seem more open and tolerant of different viewpoints. Now she just seems extremely angry.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 08:35 AM
 
62,439 posts, read 28,688,891 times
Reputation: 18373
Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
Actually, I quite liked that Rosie with her talk show and compassion and charity. She got weird later, or maybe it was she stopped acting and starting being herself? Not sure, but she's really gone off the deep end now. She's passionate about her beliefs, which I can respect. But she's not nice and compassionate anymore, and everything is black and white with her. She used to seem more open and tolerant of different viewpoints. Now she just seems extremely angry.
She's completely jumped on the liberal band wagon now which doesn't deal in rationality but emotion.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 10:04 AM
 
7,413 posts, read 6,195,354 times
Reputation: 6660
Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
Actually, I quite liked that Rosie with her talk show and compassion and charity. She got weird later, or maybe it was she stopped acting and starting being herself? Not sure, but she's really gone off the deep end now. She's passionate about her beliefs, which I can respect. But she's not nice and compassionate anymore, and everything is black and white with her. She used to seem more open and tolerant of different viewpoints. Now she just seems extremely angry.
I liked her then too. I faintly remember her starting to go loony when she grilled Tom Selleck about guns. He was trying to have a rational conversation with her about the changing culture, but you can't have a reasonable discussion about guns with someone whose argument starts with "guns bear a responsibility too."

I don't watch the View either. The reason I'm even aware of this is because she is in the news now with her returning to The View this week. She was fired for some reason a few years ago, and so clips have been popping up of her in various articles and news feeds, as she's a very outspoken liberal and reflects (at least I thought?) much of the opinions of the average liberal. (Re the hate for Sarah Palin and the Bush deflection in spite of a six year Obama presidency).
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 11:34 AM
 
170 posts, read 132,999 times
Reputation: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swingblade View Post
If you are looking to be dumbed down this is the show for you.
Not a chance. The distinction goes to FauxNews, I mean propaganda channel. Opppps, I mean FoxNews. Oh well, same difference.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Plymouth Meeting, PA.
5,715 posts, read 3,221,582 times
Reputation: 3122
no its the mainstream liberal way of thinking that all homosexuals are monogamous.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas View Post
You mean like heterosexuals are
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 12:47 PM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,489,232 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by FKD19124 View Post
no its the mainstream liberal way of thinking that all homosexuals are monogamous.
Gays can be monogamous or not monogamous, just like heteros. So, what's your beef?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Plymouth Meeting, PA.
5,715 posts, read 3,221,582 times
Reputation: 3122
I think its interesting that you call it FauxNews. Is it because they do not sugar coat the news like CNN and MSNBC?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondu54 View Post
Not a chance. The distinction goes to FauxNews, I mean propaganda channel. Opppps, I mean FoxNews. Oh well, same difference.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2014, 12:51 PM
 
7,006 posts, read 6,968,695 times
Reputation: 7058
Rosie "Ching chong, Ching chong" ODonnell is back on the View? Wow, liberals sure do love their racist Democrat celebrities! They have a real problem with Asians, I've noticed.


Rosie O'Donnell Ching Chong - YouTube
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top