Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
After 6 years of obstructing the Obama Agenda (and rightfully so), you'd think liberals and Democrats would have enough foresight to see that a GOP-Controlled House under Hillary Clinton would be yet another wasted 4 or 8 years.
What exactly do you folks not understand about that?
And if you do understand it, then why push her through to the nomination?
After 6 years of obstructing the Obama Agenda (and rightfully so), you'd think liberals and Democrats would have enough foresight to see that a GOP-Controlled House under Hillary Clinton would be yet another wasted 4 or 8 years.
What exactly do you folks not understand about that?
And if you do understand it, then why push her through to the nomination?
Are liberals and Democrats really this ignorant?
Depends on who the GOP runs, trot out one of your TP'ers and the voters will prove once again how ignorant Republicans really are.
After 6 years of obstructing the Obama Agenda (and rightfully so), you'd think liberals and Democrats would have enough foresight to see that a GOP-Controlled House under Hillary Clinton would be yet another wasted 4 or 8 years.
What exactly do you folks not understand about that?
And if you do understand it, then why push her through to the nomination?
Are liberals and Democrats really this ignorant?
Why did you go with Romney? Everyone knew that he is a loser.
After 6 years of obstructing the Obama Agenda (and rightfully so), you'd think liberals and Democrats would have enough foresight to see that a GOP-Controlled House under Hillary Clinton would be yet another wasted 4 or 8 years.
What exactly do you folks not understand about that?
And if you do understand it, then why push her through to the nomination?
I don't understand the question.
I despise the Clintons and have said so many times, but what's your point? The House will probably be Republican until there is another Republican pres. as awful as Bush. Are the Democrats not supposed to nominate anybody?
Bill Clinton did very well with a Republican Congress, iirc.
After 6 years of obstructing the Obama Agenda (and rightfully so), you'd think liberals and Democrats would have enough foresight to see that a GOP-Controlled House under Hillary Clinton would be yet another wasted 4 or 8 years.
What exactly do you folks not understand about that?
And if you do understand it, then why push her through to the nomination?
Are liberals and Democrats really this ignorant?
Demographic trends pretty much preclude the House from being GOP controlled that long.
While the GOP likely has a good shot at keeping the House through the next redistricting nothing is set in stone. If Hillary (or whoever the Democratic nominee is) wins something close to Obama did in 2008, they could have coatails large enough to take the House
The glorified bimbo once said in a debate "I got millions of ideas. The problem is the country can't afford them!".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
