Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-16-2014, 11:30 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
conservatives just can't deal with reality. From my reading I think the city lawyers are wrong andover reaching.

But their over reaching has nothing to do with the conservative fiction/lying that they are trying to ban any speech.

I think that based on the legal battle that is ongoing over this ordinance banning discrimination against homosexuals, that calling for sermons to see if some of the opponents many of whom are preachers used their church pulpit for political purposes which is against the law, is over reaching, but these subpoenas have nothing to do with this conservative fiction about the subpoenas.


I don't care about this issue, and yet all I did was read neutral sources to get to reality and it always differs from conservative fictional make believe lies.

conservatives exist in a fantasy world, where even if you agree with them, you can't agree with them because they are so delusional and or dishonest.
There is nothing in the Constitution that stops a pastor from speaking on political issues. There are no court rulings that do that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-16-2014, 11:33 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by AT9 View Post
Looks like some reasonable people have chimed in already but please, fellow conservatives, please stop the hysterical persecution complex here. The city isn't a random demand by the city to crack down on "hate speech," it's a legal strategy to keep their LGBT ordinance from being submitted to a public vote in a lawsuit in which these churches' activities/sermons is potentially relevant to their defense. That's it.

Is the Houston mayor a bully? Maybe. Do I think the ordinance is stupid? Yes. Is the discovery request overly broad? Perhaps (the judge will decide). Is this a targeted persecution to limit free speech and liberty? No!
You contradict yourself. Why is everyone claiming they had no prior knowledge of the requests?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2014, 11:36 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamme73 View Post
Wow 18pages in this thread and a conservtvative has no idea the basic reality of the case.

This conservative thinks the city is trying to win a legal battle over the legality of thrown out signatures on the basis of the pastors being anti homosexual bigots. Smh makes no logical sense.
I support gay marriage. I support the legalization of pot. I am anti-death penalty. I am about as anti-war as anyone here. I have argued more than anyone for the prosecution of the corrupt bankers. That makes me a "conservative"?

IMO your only desire is not to discuss the issue but to take pot shots at some vague group of people you for don't care for. (I've pointed this out before)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2014, 12:21 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,117,467 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
There is nothing in the Constitution that stops a pastor from speaking on political issues. There are no court rulings that do that.
That's not the issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2014, 12:25 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
That's not the issue.
It is what I replied to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2014, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,477,762 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
There is nothing in the Constitution that stops a pastor from speaking on political issues. There are no court rulings that do that.
There's nothing in the Constitution saying they must be tax exempt either. That is a quid pro quo, subject to reasonable regulation.

On the face of it, this subpoena seems over the top, but that doesn't mean there are not some cases in which the political activity of churches could legitimately be scrutinized.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2014, 02:24 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
There's nothing in the Constitution saying they must be tax exempt either. That is a quid pro quo, subject to reasonable regulation.
Actually it does. The courts have ruled on this many times.

Quote:
On the face of it, this subpoena seems over the top, but that doesn't mean there are not some cases in which the political activity of churches could legitimately be scrutinized.
Of course there are. The courts have ruled many times on that also.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2014, 02:50 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,477,762 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Actually it does. The courts have ruled on this many times.
No, they have not. They have said the tax exemption is permitted under the Constitution, not mandated by it. Check your facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2014, 02:52 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
No, they have not. They have said the tax exemption is permitted under the Constitution, not mandated by it. Check your facts.
Nope, they have ruled that taxing religions would allow the government an undue influence over religion.

"Quit talking bad about abortion or we will tax you". Just used as an example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2014, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,477,762 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Nope, they have ruled that taxing religions would allow the government an undue influence over religion.

"Quit talking bad about abortion or we will tax you". Just used as an example.
No, using the carrot of tax-exempt status does exactly what you are claiming a tax would do. That's why it occasionally becomes controversial.

A tax of X% applied to all church receipts upfront, collected from all religious organizations indiscriminately, would not do that.

Please cite the precedent you think supports your view. In the meantime, you may like to review The Law of Church and State in the Supreme Court.

Last edited by djacques; 10-16-2014 at 03:03 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top