Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-22-2014, 05:24 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,968,141 times
Reputation: 2177

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shotcall View Post
Well, feel free to educate...
Absolutely.

The first thing you must do for math.. Is comprehend the terms used for the variables.

Your number comes from the published "for federal candidates" line on the web page.

You never defined what that means and what it does NOT mean.

You fail at basic math.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-22-2014, 05:45 PM
 
Location: Lake Nona
601 posts, read 459,924 times
Reputation: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
Absolutely.

The first thing you must do for math.. Is comprehend the terms used for the variables.

Your number comes from the published "for federal candidates" line on the web page.

You never defined what that means and what it does NOT mean.

You fail at basic math.
Dude, its politics. Politicians throw out numbers all the time to fit their message.
You fail at Political Science...
Besides, its what she is spending it on is the issue here...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 05:50 PM
 
45,222 posts, read 26,431,296 times
Reputation: 24976
Well this thread really brought out the Paliners
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 07:19 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,968,141 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotcall View Post
Dude, its politics. Politicians throw out numbers all the time to fit their message.
You fail at Political Science...
Besides, its what she is spending it on is the issue here...
Not according to you, it isn't.

Your argument was that Sarahpac wasn't spending on "federal candidates".

So, your point was what it WAS NOT spending money on, not what it was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 07:20 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,968,141 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Well this thread really brought out the Paliners
No, I just like showing the haters for what they are - mindless haters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 07:24 PM
 
45,222 posts, read 26,431,296 times
Reputation: 24976
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
No, I just like showing the haters for what they are - mindless haters.
Those are the "Paliners"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 07:28 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,968,141 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Those are the "Paliners"
Nope, that's liberals. The basis for modern liberalism is hate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 07:40 PM
 
Location: Lake Nona
601 posts, read 459,924 times
Reputation: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
Not according to you, it isn't.

Your argument was that Sarahpac wasn't spending on "federal candidates".

So, your point was what it WAS NOT spending money on, not what it was.
Actually, the point was for fellow liberals to rejoice in the fact that Palin is still around with enough donors to give idiot conservatives a false sense of hope. I just used that as a starting point. Thanks for playing...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 07:54 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,968,141 times
Reputation: 2177
Quote:
Originally Posted by shotcall View Post
Actually, the point was for fellow liberals to rejoice in the fact that Palin is still around with enough donors to give idiot conservatives a false sense of hope. I just used that as a starting point. Thanks for playing...
I think you have no clue what you're talking about.

The first thing you need to learn, if you intend to win a contest of ideas... is that you need to know what your opponents think. Obviously, you do not.

The second thing you need to learn - that your politics do not make you a "not idiot".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2014, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Lake Nona
601 posts, read 459,924 times
Reputation: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
I think you have no clue what you're talking about.

The first thing you need to learn, if you intend to win a contest of ideas... is that you need to know what your opponents think. Obviously, you do not.

The second thing you need to learn - that your politics do not make you a "not idiot".
The contest I'm concerned with when it comes to Palin is in 2016. I don't feel the need to respect anyone who shares her views and her public approval currently indicates that my opponents on this topic simply don't matter. The end result of the past two Presidential elections say hi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top