Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just out of curiosity, where do you get this stuff? Do you get a newsletter from Wasserman Shultz in your email each morning or something? Do you wake up and think of the best lies you can tell online that day? Where does it come from?
Simple observation? Just make a Venn diagram of things the Confederacy believes, and things the Tea Party believes, and observe that you've made a circle.
Simple observation? Just make a Venn diagram of things the Confederacy believes, and things the Tea Party believes, and observe that you've made a circle.
That is a little all encompassing and over the top, don't you think?
I can't speak for the entire nation - and neither can you - but speaking for myself, I most certainly DID "decide" to vote for Republicans, and I did it to send a message, which is EXACTLY what everybody is saying that the voters did.
Your being in disagreement with the voters doesn't magically give you insight into what they were thinking when they pulled the lever, nor does it make you right, which you're not.
And the reverse is true, as well. Your disagreement with another poster doesn't make you automatically right, and your experience isn't necessarily shared by all the voters who showed up at the polls.
Simple observation? Just make a Venn diagram of things the Confederacy believes, and things the Tea Party believes, and observe that you've made a circle.
Please cite for us some similarities to prove you arent on drugs..
Bears resemblance to the reaction of many Republicans after the 2012 election, eh.
In the end many accepted that not enough registered Republican's voted, no different than the 2014 mid terms when Democrats did not turn out.
Since when does it matter who holds the majority or sits the oval?
There seems to be more differences within the Republican Party than there does between Democrats and Republicans. The party did however do a solid job with sending candidates to charm school and weeding out the serious whack jobs. Most ran on platforms of anti Obama instead of anything substantial. The late in the game fear mongering about Ebola certainly helped.
Gotta love politians criticizing the appointment of a non medical Ebola Czar and then ignoring science. Half of us should have already perished from Ebola, according to some media and politians in need of face time before the election.
Now it's crickets. Politics as usual.
"Since when does it matter who holds the majority or sits the oval?"
If you actually believe that then please, PLEASE do NOT vote.
"Most ran on platforms of anti Obama instead of anything substantial." Because the dems could NOT run on anything Obama did that WAS substantial.They SUPPORTED HIM AND HIS POLICIES. MOST VOTERS DO NOT LIKE HIS POLICIES AND WILL NOT SUPPORT THOSE THAT DO.
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,831,906 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230
New Coke didn’t catch on but not because the marketing executives at Coca-Cola sent the wrong message. Nobody liked the taste of the new recipe. That’s the message that every marketing maven should take to heart.
New Coke didn’t catch on but not because the marketing executives at Coca-Cola sent the wrong message. Nobody liked the taste of the new recipe. That’s the message that every marketing maven should take to heart.
Wait...what?
When it was rolled out, three quarters of drinkers polled reported they would buy it again. After the initial boom in sales, New Coke wound up performing about the same as the original formula had been selling the year before. In fact, New Coke routinely won most public taste tests, even up into the late 90s. It was determined that the backlash to New Coke was really just the result of people angry over the absence of the old formula, rather than a distaste for the new one.[LEFT]
Read more: New Coke | Cracked.com
[/LEFT]
That's one of the more ridiculous things I've read on here.
No--truly the most ridiculous is that Rick Scott is a viable candidate for president. That is hysterical. He barely won as governor -- less than 1%. He is pretty much detested. In 4 years I did not hear anyone say one positive thing about him--nada. He's a bald python masquerading as a human. He's pretty much looked at as someone who should have gone to prison for ripping off medicare and the taxpayers. Just reflects that the GOP is truly out of people and ideas.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
