Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2014, 05:12 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,300,389 times
Reputation: 8958

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Maybe this trend will be reversed, but for now, the Dems are in full retreat.
------------------------------------------
A very legit question. (Granted I posed it.) Outside of a few urban centers, California, and New England the Dems are nowhere. Add that people are leaving California and the North East in droves and one can see the Democratic Party’s problem. They are in danger of becoming the Quebecois Party of the USA. Man, have things changed, and it is largely due to a president that much of America simply doesn’t trust.

Is the Democratic Party just a regional party at this point? | AgainstCronyCapitalism.org
The Democrat Party is cooked for the near future. Done!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2014, 06:43 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area (recent MN transplant...go gophers)
148 posts, read 149,327 times
Reputation: 368
If we're going by pure statewide electoral counts, then yes, the Democratic Party is a regional party. They specialize in the Northeast, Pacific West, and Upper Midwest. Likewise, the Republican Party would also be a regional party that specializes in the Southeast, Great Plains, and Mountain West.

There, everybody's a regional party. Problem solved. Now let's go get pizza or something.
Quote:
Outside of a few urban centers, California, and New England the Dems are nowhere.
Yeah, if you didn't count the most populous state in the country, the most densely populated region in the country, and the places where 80% of the American population live*, and I guess northern Minnesota's Iron Range, Republicans got everything locked the hell down.

*https://ask.census.gov/faq.php?id=5000&faqId=5971
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2014, 06:46 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,899,172 times
Reputation: 5948
Not too many years back: many people thought the Repubs were finished, even I had my doubts about them. 2014 things have changed a LOT and, it's the Dems that are having big problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2014, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Someplace Wonderful
5,177 posts, read 4,790,047 times
Reputation: 2587
Its all about winning elections. I would suggest that republicans have not been very successful at winning elections of late.

Now the right wing will continue to crow about the 2014 senate and house results, but in 2016 the are ten dem and 24 rep senate seats up for grabs. The dems might easily recover the majority in the senate. Especially if the reps nominate another loser for president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2014, 06:57 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,965,821 times
Reputation: 7315
OP, By land mass the BW is not gigantic, but it contains high density, heavy EC states. The Dems have won 5 of the last 6 popular POTUS votes, and won the 2012 cumulative Senate/Congressional vote by 2 million.

I do agree where there are more livestock than people the GOP does well. Last I heard, there has not been a Bison Suffrage movement, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2014, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Down the rabbit hole
863 posts, read 1,196,182 times
Reputation: 2741
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckmann View Post
Its all about winning elections. I would suggest that republicans have not been very successful at winning elections of late.

Now the right wing will continue to crow about the 2014 senate and house results, but in 2016 the are ten dem and 24 rep senate seats up for grabs. The dems might easily recover the majority in the senate. Especially if the reps nominate another loser for president.
What does it say about a party when they can't even front a candidate who can beat a president that (allegedly) most of America doesn't like?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2014, 07:17 PM
 
409 posts, read 258,646 times
Reputation: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catdancer View Post
What does it say about a party when they can't even front a candidate who can beat a president that (allegedly) most of America doesn't like?
This is a bit of a fallacy, Obama was actually still somewhat popular in 2012, at the time of the election he had a net positive approval of +3. It wasn't until last year when all of the lies used to sell Obamacare began to unravel that his approval rating sank to where he's now 10-15 points underwater. If Romney and Obama had been on the ballot last November, Romney would have won.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2014, 07:43 PM
 
Location: Somewhere extremely awesome
3,130 posts, read 3,073,047 times
Reputation: 2472
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
The topic is whether or not the Democrat party is a "regional" party. The claims lately are that the Republican party is the "regional" party, but the maps prove that the opposite is true.
Neither party is a regional party.

In most places in the U.S., both Republicans and Democrats receive at least 1/3 of the vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2014, 07:53 PM
 
27,131 posts, read 15,308,615 times
Reputation: 12068
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
IL is pretty red too if you exclude 90% of the voters.




Excluding 90% of the voters in Illinois would still leave 60% of the voters left.



.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2014, 08:22 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,733,986 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuckmann View Post
Its all about winning elections. I would suggest that republicans have not been very successful at winning elections of late.
Hmmm.... Majority in the Senate. Majority in the House. Majority of Governors....... What elections are you watching?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top