Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
yes OBL is dead...is Alq, or isis, or the Taliban, or boko, or the dozen of other terrorist organizations???
no, they are not...one man (OBL) does not make the terror organization
did you hear about the isis attack in Kabul last week???... or that isis now has a foothold in Uzbekistan and also in Tajikistan??
or are you that shut out of the world
None of those groups exist in a form that threatens the West if the West didn't interfere in the Middle East. We should have used the Taliban to bring the Al-Qaeda leadership to our feet, but no..."Democracy and freedom! patriots!!! Yaaa buddy stars and bars!" ruled the day.
yes OBL is dead...is Alq, or isis, or the Taliban, or boko, or the dozen of other terrorist organizations???
no, they are not...one man (OBL) does not make the terror organization
did you hear about the isis attack in Kabul last week???... or that isis now has a foothold in Uzbekistan and also in Tajikistan??
or are you that shut out of the world
I don't care if Kabul gets blown off the Atlas. Big deal.
Nor do I care about the aforementioned groups.
You're wasting your time in Afghanistan buddy. Keep taking in the contractor dough...I ain't mad. But please stop acting as if you're making a difference.
I've been saying for a while that we created ISIS....or shall i say that we SURELY created the conditions for it by yet again interfering in the internal affairs of a foreign nation thereby making a bad situation much worse.
This piece/interview in the Guardian by Martin Chulov features an interview with Abu Ahmed, who explains how they formed ISIS right under our noses by using Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi (ISIS leader), who tricked the Americans into believing that he was a peaceful Sunni leader. This excerpt is unbelievable:
Pathetic. And it gets worse:
Congratulations my fellow Americans. You should be proud.
Only a confused liberal would confer recognition and rationalization of barbaric acts and cruelty to an enemy.
This is the problem with liberalism. Liberals sincerely doubt the principles of US liberty and freedom and suggest that ALL NATIONS and ALL BELIEFS, regardless of performance, have moral equivilency.
Therefore the average liberal will rationalize and "justify" beheadings, stonings, lynchings, burning of prisoners, and extermination of Christians as being an "expected response" to treatment of Iraqi prisoners.
Only a confused liberal would confer recognition and rationalization of barbaric acts and cruelty to an enemy.
This is the problem with liberalism. Liberals sincerely doubt the principles of US liberty and freedom and suggest that ALL NATIONS and ALL BELIEFS, regardless of performance, have moral equivilency.
Therefore the average liberal will rationalize and "justify" beheadings, stonings, lynchings, burning of prisoners, and extermination of Christians as being an "expected response" to treatment of Iraqi prisoners.
Are you high, or just very confused?
I'm not a liberal but after reading posts like these, damn it makes Government paid secondary education sound like a good idea. A lot of America has no critical thinking skills whatsoever, so when it comes to political views it amounts to regurgitating whatever cable news hosts say almost verbatim.
Only a confused liberal would confer recognition and rationalization of barbaric acts and cruelty to an enemy.
This is the problem with liberalism. Liberals sincerely doubt the principles of US liberty and freedom and suggest that ALL NATIONS and ALL BELIEFS, regardless of performance, have moral equivilency.
Therefore the average liberal will rationalize and "justify" beheadings, stonings, lynchings, burning of prisoners, and extermination of Christians as being an "expected response" to treatment of Iraqi prisoners.
Are you high, or just very confused?
If we hadn't invaded Iraq to bring them some of that good ol' American "liberty and freedom" ISIS wouldn't be running around unchecked beheading people at will. If we had listened to the crazy Zionist neocons in the GOP we would have brought "freedom and liberty" to Syria and the black flag of ISIS would be flying in Damascus right now.
Only a confused liberal would confer recognition and rationalization of barbaric acts and cruelty to an enemy.
This is the problem with liberalism. Liberals sincerely doubt the principles of US liberty and freedom and suggest that ALL NATIONS and ALL BELIEFS, regardless of performance, have moral equivilency.
Therefore the average liberal will rationalize and "justify" beheadings, stonings, lynchings, burning of prisoners, and extermination of Christians as being an "expected response" to treatment of Iraqi prisoners.
I have to say as a left leaning Independent, I once thought of this cat as the opposition, the Other, but once I started to read about him for myself I had to do some serious rethinking and reevaluations. So though at times, we may be ideological rivals, I can’t deny that I have a developed an admiration for the man. Without further ado, Dr. Ron Paul. “I am optimistic about this policy shift by the US government but I am also very cautious. President Obama also seemed to suggest that the US would continue meddling in internal Cuban affairs, stating that the United States “will continue to support the civil society” in Cuba. That likely means a deal to allow US NGOs in to Cuba to work toward regime change.”
There were no ISIS, alCIAda in Iraq before the US led war crime.
The rape of Iraq was done on purpose. Look at all the national treasures looted from the Iraqi Museum. It was all transferred to this "created" state called Israel. Stealing culture, history etc etc.... To build this state.
As a left leaning Independent I must say I have had to do some re-evaluations when it comes to politics.
Especially when one has limousiners that have cable comedy shows lecturing people all the while sipping on their lattes in their gated communities.
While on the other hand a group that the mainstream media tags as kooks, conspiracy freaks and sometimes racist seems to actually turn out to be the group that resists the excesses of global empire.
"Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton faced off with Kennedy, Matt Welch, and Kmele Foster on Fox Business' The Independents Monday night and things got heated over the current crisis in Iraq and whether going in all those years ago was worth it. Kennedy grilled Bolton over the Bush administration's role in destabilizing Iraq, and Bolton shot back by accusing libertarians like themselves of "defending a dictatorship."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
