Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Blue eyes, blonde hair is one thing. But it should be the personal choice of parents.
That said, I have 0 problem with GMO for things like, cancer risk, heart disease, and other genetic disorders and trying to weed that out of the population genome.
Same here. We should "breed out" all those genes that cause serious diseases like tht. But what the article is talking about is, in my view, nothing short of eugenics.
Same here. We should "breed out" all those genes that cause serious diseases like tht. But what the article is talking about is, in my view, nothing short of eugenics.
Its not eugenics to say "I want this trait, or that trait" in my child. It would be eugenics if they said "You people with diabetes can not have natural children"
Same here. We should "breed out" all those genes that cause serious diseases like tht. But what the article is talking about is, in my view, nothing short of eugenics.
Liberals and Progressives love them some eugenics.
So this whole DNA/Genetics thing is rather confusing for most Progressives. Biology is out, Chemistry is OK when we're talking about Weed, Physics has too much Math, and any Science that disagrees with their identity politics is out as well.
This is one of the best cases of what I call Conservative Confusion; arguing both sides of the topic as long as the main thrust of the post is to denigrate liberals.
So this whole DNA/Genetics thing is rather confusing for most Progressives. Biology is out, Chemistry is OK when we're talking about Weed, Physics has too much Math, and any Science that disagrees with their identity politics is out as well.
This is one of the best cases of what I call Conservative Confusion; arguing both sides of the topic as long as the main thrust of the post is to denigrate liberals.
It just cannot be taken seriously!
The only types of science that counts to conservatives are:
1. ???
So this whole DNA/Genetics thing is rather confusing for most Progressives. Biology is out, Chemistry is OK when we're talking about Weed, Physics has too much Math, and any Science that disagrees with their identity politics is out as well.
This is one of the best cases of what I call Conservative Confusion; arguing both sides of the topic as long as the main thrust of the post is to denigrate liberals.
It just cannot be taken seriously!
Eugenics isn't a science. Eugenics was a Liberal Progressive philosophy very popular in the early 20th Century. The Catholic Church was against it, meaning it was lock step a Liberal Progressive movement. Again, it's not a science.
I'm denigrating Liberals on this subject. You guys own this area. Just like you own Education and Social Policy. I don't make the rules and I don't decide who wins.
But then there is another group out here...growing bit by bit...with people like me representative of it. Anti all political parties (liars, each and everyone of them) who adore science more than Liberals and Conservatives put together. We actually go where the science tells us, not cherry pick for our social smugness capital amongst our identity political friends we tsk tsk with.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
