Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Indeed, Wright is a racist Black supremacist, leading a racist church for the over 20 years in which Obama was a member, was married in the church, and had his daughters baptized in the church. The Trinity UCC is based on racist Black Liberation Theology, according to Wright himself...
Rev. Wright in 2007:
"The vision statement of Trinity United Church of Christ is based upon the systematized liberation theologythat started in 1969 with the publication of Dr. James Cone’s book, Black Power and Black Theology." https://web.archive.org/web/20080905...ing_points.htm
"Most whites, some despite involvement in protests, do believe in "freedom in democracy," and they fight to make the ideals of the Constitution an empirical reality for all. It seems that they believe that, if we just work hard enough at it, this country can be what it ought to be. But it never dawns on these do-gooders that what is wrong with America is not its failure to make the Constitution a reality for all, but rather its belief that persons can affirm whiteness and humanity at the same time." A Black Theology of Liberation - James H. Cone - Google Books
In context, Dr. Cone's use of the terms white, black, whiteness and blackness are not normally referring to a persons skin color. Of course you would actually have to read his books to understand that. Dr. Cone has been questioned many times on this issue. Here is one interview.
Hordern :...On the one hand, in A Black Theology of Liberation, page 12, you say that blackness symbolizes the oppressors and enslavement. In that use a person with white skin may in fact be “black,” while a person with black skin may be “white.”...
In context, Dr. Cone's use of the terms white, black, whiteness and blackness are not normally referring to a persons skin color. Of course you would actually have to read his books to understand that. Dr. Cone has been questioned many times on this issue. Here is one interview.
Hordern :...On the one hand, in A Black Theology of Liberation, page 12, you say that blackness symbolizes the oppressors and enslavement. In that use a person with white skin may in fact be “black,” while a person with black skin may be “white.”...
So again your point is since Democrats embraced racists it's ok for conservatives to embrace racists.
No, my point is that it's extremely hypocritical to condemn an R who merely spoke to a group, but embrace a D who was not only a member of but a leader of and recruiter for the KKK.
Gruber was right about the incredibly stupid Dem voter base.
No, my point is that it's extremely hypocritical to condemn an R who merely spoke to a group, but embrace a D who was not only a member of but a leader of and recruiter for the KKK.
Gruber was right about the incredibly stupid Dem voter base.
OK so another dumb conservative argument, sinc Democrats are hypocritics, conservatives should be able to embrace racists.
Again, I can't make this stuff up. this is the level conservatives are at and they think it's a winner.
Not at all surprising considering Rev Wright's admission in 2007 of Obama's church of 20+ years, Trinity UCC, being based on racist White-hating Black Liberation Theology.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
