Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Your position was made and cast in concrete before Mr Brown's body was cold. Most likely before he was shot for assaulting a police officer. This is just another opportunity for you to pound the same broken drum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe
^^It's dangerous times when the gov murders with impunity. If you felt differently about how the case should have gone you might think differently.
Your position was made and cast in concrete before Mr Brown's body was cold. Most likely before he was shot for assaulting a police officer. This is just another opportunity for you to pound the same broken drum.
What are you saying?
I've went through the case extensively. There was a thread where all of you had the opportunity to prove my analysis wrong and you couldn't.
What exactly are you trying to say about me earthlyfather?
How could she have spoken out then? Would it have been legal?
IF she truly thought the case was being mishandled she could have and should have alerted SOMEONE. so then she was worried about that's legal but now she wants an exception to the law? She should have asked for the exception then when something could have been done about it.
IF she truly thought the case was being mishandled she could have and should have alerted SOMEONE. so then she was worried about that's legal but now she wants an exception to the law? She should have asked for the exception then when something could have been done about it.
She would be removed from the GJ for speaking out and she could be prosecuted no?
Also, how would she have known how everyone else was gonna vote?
She would be removed from the GJ for speaking out and she could be prosecuted no?
Also, how would she have known how everyone else was gonna vote?
If she's saying the prosecutor intentionally threw the case you don't have to wait. She's doig this for money and won't win. Next time she should decline jury duty.
That's why there's a jury of your peers. If they find no judgement what happened is none of your business.
The DA released the testimony, he called some witnesses liars, he gave his own interpretation of how the GJ reached its decision. I want the juror to win the lawsuit.
Governor. He was there. Wasnt the DOJ overseeing this and made avail in ferguson. I am certain she would have been able to get someone's attwntion. Sharpton (who would fwd to holder). DA is not the be all end all. Again, she's too late and assed out.
And at the same time she's not. Because wilson is not protected by double jeopardy. So another DA can convene a grand jury and have wilson/ferguson/the country go through this again.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
