Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-07-2015, 07:54 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,365,659 times
Reputation: 17261

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
I'm with the Pubs on this. SS disability is horribly abused. Half the damn country is on it and many for conditions that are both preventable and reversible with lifestyle changes. Cut them off and clean up the fraud and waste. Get the fat azzes on a treadmill.
SS disability is horribly abused - if by horribly abused you mean its fairly rare, with 1 in 10 dying within 5 years of receiving it

half the damn country is on it - If by half the damn country you mean 4.6% of those 18-65

if by conditions that are both preventable and reversible you mean things like mental illness, cancer, etc

Could some be resolved by the ol treadmill? I have no idea. neither do you really, you just believe that I bet. got any evidence to back up that assertion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-07-2015, 08:00 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
SS disability is horribly abused - if by horribly abused you mean its fairly rare, with 1 in 10 dying within 5 years of receiving it

half the damn country is on it - If by half the damn country you mean 4.6% of those 18-65

if by conditions that are both preventable and reversible you mean things like mental illness, cancer, etc

Could some be resolved by the ol treadmill? I have no idea. neither do you really, you just believe that I bet. got any evidence to back up that assertion?
SSA has even said that abuse runs about 22%.


Yes America, Your Fellow Citizens DO Abuse Federal Aid Programs - Forbes
The sloppy process used to determine Social Security disability eligibility should alarm taxpayers given that the lifetime cost of each award averages $300,000. The life-time costs are so high because once on, few leave the program’s rolls. More than half of those matriculating from SSDI in 2011 left because they had reached full retirement age, and therefore transferred onto traditional Social Security benefits. Just 3.6 percent left because of medical improvement, and 6.1 percent returned to work.
..
Even the progressive think tank, Center for American Progress, criticized SSDI for providing “strong incentives to applicants and beneficiaries to remain permanently out of the workforce.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 08:10 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,365,659 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
SSA has even said that abuse runs about 22%.


Yes America, Your Fellow Citizens DO Abuse Federal Aid Programs - Forbes
The sloppy process used to determine Social Security disability eligibility should alarm taxpayers given that the lifetime cost of each award averages $300,000. The life-time costs are so high because once on, few leave the program’s rolls. More than half of those matriculating from SSDI in 2011 left because they had reached full retirement age, and therefore transferred onto traditional Social Security benefits. Just 3.6 percent left because of medical improvement, and 6.1 percent returned to work.
..
Even the progressive think tank, Center for American Progress, criticized SSDI for providing “strong incentives to applicants and beneficiaries to remain permanently out of the workforce.”
Sigh. Reading is fundamental.

Quote:
His committee examined 300 cases of Americans who were awarded Social Security disability benefits and determined that more than one quarter received benefits based on “insufficient, contradictory, or incomplete evidence.”
insufficient evidence does not mean fraud.
contradictory evidence does not mean fraud.
incomplete evidence does not mean fraud.

But of course you (and the article) state that its fraud or abuse.

I do agree about the criticism that there are strong disincentives to return to work, and would be all for ideas that fix that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Sigh. Reading is fundamental.

insufficient evidence does not mean fraud.
contradictory evidence does not mean fraud.
incomplete evidence does not mean fraud.

But of course you (and the article) state that its fraud or abuse.

I do agree about the criticism that there are strong disincentives to return to work, and would be all for ideas that fix that.
That is just part and parcel of any government program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 08:18 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,365,659 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
That is just part and parcel of any government program.
So when welfare changed it to a 5 year lifetime limit, added in a ton of training, and incentives to find work.....that was part and parcel?

Quit repeating talking points that dont always apply. Generic "That is just part and parcel of any government program." is hogwash. Come on.

Social security could do more, but generic talking points are wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 08:18 PM
 
19,718 posts, read 10,118,354 times
Reputation: 13080
I know there is abuse, but some of the rules are stupid. I know a young man (35) who is totally blind. He worked about 60 hours a week for several years. When he started to lose his sight, he applied for help to go to an eye doctor. Medicaid turned him down for three years. As soon as he was totally blind, they gave him Medicaid and spent thousands trying to restore his sight. His doctor said that if he had treated him a few years ago, they probably could have saved his sight. Instead, he will be on Soc Sec disability and Medicaid for life. He would rather be working. It will cost far more to support him for the next 30 or so years than it would have to save his eyesight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 08:20 PM
 
34,278 posts, read 19,365,659 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
I know there is abuse, but some of the rules are stupid. I know a young man (35) who is totally blind. He worked about 60 hours a week for several years. When he started to lose his sight, he applied for help to go to an eye doctor. Medicaid turned him down for three years. As soon as he was totally blind, they gave him Medicaid and spent thousands trying to restore his sight. His doctor said that if he had treated him a few years ago, they probably could have saved his sight. Instead, he will be on Soc Sec disability and Medicaid for life. He would rather be working. It will cost far more to support him for the next 30 or so years than it would have to save his eyesight.
Sigh. This is more of a single pay argument then a social security discussion. As for seeing a dr....why didn't he see one when he started to lose his sight while working 60 hours a week?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 08:28 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
So when welfare changed it to a 5 year lifetime limit, added in a ton of training, and incentives to find work.....that was part and parcel?

Quit repeating talking points that dont always apply. Generic "That is just part and parcel of any government program." is hogwash. Come on.

Social security could do more, but generic talking points are wrong.
No, it was the TANF program. You have about 80+ other programs that don't kick you off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 08:31 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Sigh. This is more of a single pay argument then a social security discussion. As for seeing a dr....why didn't he see one when he started to lose his sight while working 60 hours a week?
Go read the article I posted in the thread about 60% of Americans have no savings for repairs, etc.

People don't have savings and doctors won't treat you for free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2015, 08:35 PM
 
7,473 posts, read 4,014,781 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
It's about SSDI, not SS.

And the SSDI program is RAMPANT with fraud with so many people seeking this to tide them over .
Yes those on SSDI should get 20% cuts. Let them go look for a job instead.
To bad you aren't the one to go tell my brothers son who was half beaten to death,and confined to a wheelchair and has to wear a diaper that he has to take a 20% cut because he cannot work......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top