Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-27-2015, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Who is, "we"?


This is bigger than you want it to be.
There are laws congress passed and the President signed, stating we do not negotiate with terrorist.
The President broke those laws.

But that is just the tip of the iceberg. There is a lot more to it then that.

Trading a criminal that betrayed his unit, for criminals that wish to kill us all.
This has got to hit OBAMA below the belt.
The 5 were scheduled to be released given they had not been charged or prosecuted despite a decade of imprisonment, spanning two administrations. They were going home or wherever, no matter what.

 
Old 01-27-2015, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
A soldier deserts and it's the president's fault? Oh man the loonies are out tonight.
The president is responible for everything that happens anywhere in the world when one does not like the president.
 
Old 01-27-2015, 10:22 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by 14Bricks View Post
You do know that The maximum punishment for desertion during a time of war is death right? They should have left him to the Taliban.
If that had happened Obama would have been blamed.

Regardless, the 5 were going to be released given they had not been charged or prosecuted despite more than a decade of imprisionment spanning two administrations.
 
Old 01-27-2015, 10:26 AM
jw2
 
2,028 posts, read 3,265,760 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Geezus...boy, I'm telling you. SMH

I know he's in custody. The point is that you can't charge him with desertion unless you suspect somehow that he deserted. And you don't know he deserted unless you can question him to ascertain whether or not he did. And you certainly can't call him a deserter unless he's been convicted of desertion.

And Bergdahl has to be in U.S. custody to make the charge stick.

Therefore, we were right to secure his release.
This has to be the biggest stretch I have seen in a while.
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
The president is responible for everything that happens anywhere in the world when one does not like the president.
Public opinion was against giving up 5 Taliban for Bergdahl . The administration tried to show they did the right thing by calling Bergdahl a hero, repeatedly, complete with a Rose Garden announcement with Bergdahl's parents. And, of course, burying it as long as they can so they can use their famous line "after all this time, what difference does it make?". That strategy has certainly worked on half this country so far.
 
Old 01-27-2015, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,725,169 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon View Post
The "conservatives" around here were outraged that we got back a POW because he was probably a deserter, and now their outraged because he's being charged with desertion? Didn't the Pentagon and White House say the entire time that there was going to be a full investigation? So, they did what they said they were going to do; the guy will get his day in (military) court but yet there's still outrage.... Well, okay then.

You guys aren't conservative at all. You're rageaholics.
k
 
Old 01-27-2015, 10:39 AM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,520,724 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Whether or not he deserted is immaterial to whether or not you get him back. He's an American, and you do what you have to do to get him back.

And until you get him back, you don't know whether he's a deserter or not.

We did nothing wrong by exchanging people for him.
Agree 100%. Another faux outrage brought to us by the Benghazi loons.

Let's DO have another hearing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spot View Post
Roger that.

I will never leave a fallen comrade to fall into the hands of the enemy

That's the promise we make when we deploy. We bring back our own. Even when they fail us, we don't fail them.
I guess conservatives think we should break that promise. Whatever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
We did the right thing bringing Bergdahl back.

It appears we are doing the right thing by putting him on trial.

If the court finds him guilty, the military will punish him.

The system worked. There is no political issue involved.
Absolutely. The Conservative Industrial Scandal Complex is hard at work again. Perhaps we will get to see them actually govern instead of blowing a blood vessel everytime Obama breathes.

Wouldn't that a be a breath of fresh air.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Mon View Post
The "conservatives" around here were outraged that we got back a POW because he was probably a deserter, and now their outraged because he's being charged with desertion? Didn't the Pentagon and White House say the entire time that there was going to be a full investigation? So, they did what they said they were going to do; the guy will get his day in (military) court but yet there's still outrage.... Well, okay then.

You guys aren't conservative at all. You're rageaholics.
You hit the nail on the head! They thrive on division and rage.

That's how Fox keeps the low information voter riled up all the time.
 
Old 01-27-2015, 10:51 AM
 
Location: USA
31,035 posts, read 22,064,322 times
Reputation: 19078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Agree 100%. Another faux outrage brought to us by the Benghazi loons.

Let's DO have another hearing.



I guess conservatives think we should break that promise. Whatever.



Absolutely. The Conservative Industrial Scandal Complex is hard at work again. Perhaps we will get to see them actually govern instead of blowing a blood vessel everytime Obama breathes.

Wouldn't that a be a breath of fresh air.



You hit the nail on the head! They thrive on division and rage.

That's how Fox keeps the low information voter riled up all the time.
"They thrive on division and rage. "

Sounds like your guilty of the same.

So there's an Evil Conservative hiding under ever rock. You do realize that almost every member of our military leadership. Whether they be a General, Admiral, West point and Academy grad, Navy Seal, or Army Delta Force or any other Special Force member for that matter identifies as Conservative? So, from your perspective our entire military command structure is evil.
 
Old 01-27-2015, 10:56 AM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,834 posts, read 14,932,942 times
Reputation: 16587
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalmove View Post
We have Bergdahl in custody. Where are the nice lads Obama traded for him?
Cutting off the heads of the Obama non-believers.
 
Old 01-27-2015, 10:57 AM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,295,442 times
Reputation: 2314
I really do feel so badly for Berghdahl. I mean conservatives are openly witch hunting the guy.

Again, the same conservative "Id" and media that gave you such truths as the ACA death panels and French and English no go zones, has now decided that based purely on hatred of President Obama this young man is responsible for murders, a deserter, etc and so on.

And reality will not mean one thing to conservatives.


I mean I really do feel badly for the man.
 
Old 01-27-2015, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,698,449 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw2 View Post
This has to be the biggest stretch I have seen in a while.
.
Public opinion was against giving up 5 Taliban for Bergdahl . The administration tried to show they did the right thing by calling Bergdahl a hero, repeatedly, complete with a Rose Garden announcement with Bergdahl's parents. And, of course, burying it as long as they can so they can use their famous line "after all this time, what difference does it make?". That strategy has certainly worked on half this country so far.
It wasn't just the administration.

The man was a hero, until he wasn't.

"Public opinion?"

Here you go:

Ayotte Urges Defense Secretary to Redouble Efforts to Find Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl | Kelly Ayotte | United States Senator

Politicians Scramble to Delete Pro-Bergdahl Tweets as Backlash Grows

In any event, from NBC news:

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...ls-say-n294466

I did find this interesting, from the link:
"The charges will apparently not allege that Bergdahl left with the intent never to return."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top