Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-04-2015, 07:19 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,700,795 times
Reputation: 14818

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
Sigh, this is a hit piece for some ill considered comments. The Senator said that if the restaurant was required to post that on a sign, the free market would resolve the issue.

While I disagree with him about if it should be required, the reports really try to make it into something it isn't.
Instead of posting employees that are required to wash their hands, he would have them post that they aren't required to wash their hands.

Seems to me that would still be making a demand on individual businesses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-04-2015, 07:21 AM
 
Location: Maryland
7,814 posts, read 6,391,086 times
Reputation: 9974
Considering it is nearly impossible for an employer to verify that an employee has washed their hands, whatever the sign says is irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 07:23 AM
 
Location: Home, Home on the Front Range
25,826 posts, read 20,700,795 times
Reputation: 14818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
The clown/congressman cited did want a sign. He just wanted it to say "Employees may or may not have washed their hands."
I am predicting that few of the people participating in this thread will see or understand the irony.
The congressman certainly didn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 07:24 AM
 
12,062 posts, read 10,271,962 times
Reputation: 24801
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven View Post
While it should certainly be a WORK rule (at the discretion of the employer), is it really the GOVERNMENT'S place to pass a law and enforce it?
IMO, no, it is not. Where in the Constitution does it say that the Federal Government has that power? If the Government is not granted the power, how can the Government give such power to an agency created by that Government?
Commerce Clause? Article 1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,212,614 times
Reputation: 8537
Tillis is what happens when large amounts of Money from the Kochs shows up (NC) in an off year election. We now get to be embarrassed for the next 6 years.

Last edited by Boss; 02-04-2015 at 07:43 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 07:38 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,617,602 times
Reputation: 18521
Like a sign is going to make you wash your hands.
How about an automatic door lock, until the soap it pushed and the water turned on, with a sign on the door directing you to do just that to get out.


When will we see federal officials in each public bathroom, to fine and punish those not abiding by the law?

LOL... I have to laugh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 07:40 AM
 
Location: Maryland
7,814 posts, read 6,391,086 times
Reputation: 9974
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Like a sign is going to make you wash your hands.
How about an automatic door lock, until the soap it pushed and the water turned on, with a sign on the door directing you to do just that to get out.
Or an armed, government-appointed bathroom attendant making $15 bucks an hour.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,737,754 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraven View Post
Then I guess you have never been to a popular sandwich shop. There is usually two people behind the counter. One takes your order and starts your sandwich. The other completes assembling your sandwich, wraps it, puts it in a bag, hands you your drink cup(s) and works the cash register completing the sale.

Have you ever watched how some (most) of those food handlers "wash" their hands? A quick rinse, a squirt of liquid soap, a quick rub, and another quick rinse. Useless! I have even seen them dry their hands on a towel that is hanging there for that purpose. That towel isn't even clean, much less sterile! Again, useless!
This is true. And I suspect handling cash makes their hands a lot more unsanitary than using a toilet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 08:51 AM
 
46,951 posts, read 25,984,404 times
Reputation: 29442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
So you think they will only wash their hands if we pass a law?
It really doesn't matter what I think, feel or suppose - we know some restaurants will skip on essential hygiene if they can get away with it. It'd be nice to think that they wouldn't, but evidence shows that without someone looking over their shoulder to keep them on the straight and narrow, they'll cut corners. The signs are the tip of a huge iceberg.

Quote:
BTW, restaurants also value their customers and most customers value hygiene. Why do customers go to McDonalds? One reason is it's clean.
It's a selling point for some, sure. Of course, clean tables and clean kitchens with safe foodhandling aren't necessarily linked. Unless you're into personally inspecting the kitchen of every restaurant you patronize.

50% of foodborne illness in the US comes from unsafe practices in restaurants.

Quote:
BTW, hygiene is a trivial expense.
I'm sure you can find a cite for that. Those man-hours spent keeping hands, surfaces, cooling units etc. clean aren't free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 08:56 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,078 posts, read 51,224,761 times
Reputation: 28324
There must be a jackass derby going on the the Republican party. The challenge this week is who can say and do the most toward turning back the clock on a century of progress in public health.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top