Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There have been plenty of low information, clueless posters excusing away iran's illegal nuclear weapons program ("they are NOT building nukes, there is NO proof!" and the even less intelligent, "well if they are building them, they should be!") on this forum, and as the adults amongst us warned, allowing a cancerous scum hole terror state like iran to obtain nuclear weapons - which the awful obama and his equally dreadful sec'y of state seem committed to doing - has led to this, a general buildup of nuclear programs in the mideast.
Obama has severely damaged or destroyed relationships with allies like Israel, Germany, Egypt and Saudi Arabia - and his abject incompetence allowing iran to gobble up whole chunks of the mideast (Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Yemen) has led us to this horrible scenario; the most unstable region on earth undergoing almost perpetual wars accompanied by stockpiles of nuclear weapons.
If the human feces governing iran continues its imperial conquest across the mideast, does anyone rational believe that Egypt or the Saudis will not eventually militarily address them? How long before iran's diseased regime, realizing its end was near, would launch them into Cairo, Tel Aviv or Riyadh, killing millions? They have already slaughtered hundreds of thousands, so this would be a minor step forward for the animal filth khameini, a dog with oceans of blood on its hands.
In closing, I would just like to say "excellent work" to the idiot president, his apologists on this forum, as well as all of the dimwits here who have claimed that allowing iran to obtain nuclear weapons would not lead to a disastrous result in the mideast; you were absolutely wrong - and the rest of us saw this coming ten years ago.
Now we all get to live under the massive, horrific threat of a general nuclear war in the region.
Russia partnering with Egypt to build a power plant means Iran is going to nuke the world? Seriously?
Did anyone notice that the Op's story is about Egypt and Russia and has nothing to do with Iran? The story is about Russia giving assistance to Egypt on a nuclear power plant and selling them planes and weapons since their relations with the U S have soured. What does this have to do with Iran?
Did anyone notice that the Op's story is about Egypt and Russia and has nothing to do with Iran? The story is about Russia giving assistance to Egypt on a nuclear power plant and selling them planes and weapons since their relations with the U S have soured. What does this have to do with Iran?
I know. I went through the thread and I don't think anyone noticed. I thought it was a joke at first.
There have been plenty of low information, clueless posters excusing away iran's illegal nuclear weapons program ("they are NOT building nukes, there is NO proof!" and the even less intelligent, "well if they are building them, they should be!") on this forum, and as the adults amongst us warned, allowing a cancerous scum hole terror state like iran to obtain nuclear weapons - which the awful obama and his equally dreadful sec'y of state seem committed to doing - has led to this, a general buildup of nuclear programs in the mideast.
Obama has severely damaged or destroyed relationships with allies like Israel, Germany, Egypt and Saudi Arabia - and his abject incompetence allowing iran to gobble up whole chunks of the mideast (Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Yemen) has led us to this horrible scenario; the most unstable region on earth undergoing almost perpetual wars accompanied by stockpiles of nuclear weapons.
If the human feces governing iran continues its imperial conquest across the mideast, does anyone rational believe that Egypt or the Saudis will not eventually militarily address them? How long before iran's diseased regime, realizing its end was near, would launch them into Cairo, Tel Aviv or Riyadh, killing millions? They have already slaughtered hundreds of thousands, so this would be a minor step forward for the animal filth khameini, a dog with oceans of blood on its hands.
In closing, I would just like to say "excellent work" to the idiot president, his apologists on this forum, as well as all of the dimwits here who have claimed that allowing iran to obtain nuclear weapons would not lead to a disastrous result in the mideast; you were absolutely wrong - and the rest of us saw this coming ten years ago.
Now we all get to live under the massive, horrific threat of a general nuclear war in the region.
The extreme chaos in the ME is a DIRECT result of GW idiot Bush's criminal invasion of Iraq. No political scientist in the world outside of the USA even questions this fact. Not only did it create the chaos, anyone with even half a brain, {not the Bush admin.} forsaw clearly, this misadventure would create a power vacuum that Iran would most definitely take advantage of. It seems to be a repeating story of American foreign policy that what ever action is taken it will be a huge disaster and failure that creates more numerous and more powerful enemies for it's self.
Did anyone notice that the Op's story is about Egypt and Russia and has nothing to do with Iran? The story is about Russia giving assistance to Egypt on a nuclear power plant and selling them planes and weapons since their relations with the U S have soured. What does this have to do with Iran?
I realize this forum is not military.net, and does not attract the most sophisticated posters, but does this really need to be explained?
If iran were not acquiring nuclear weapons, the arab muslim regimes in the mideast would not be compelled to also acquire them. Obama's failure to stop iran has laid the groundwork for the worst possible scenario, a nuclear arms race in the most volatile place on earth. No one in the mideast was pressing to acquire nuclear weapons until it became clear iran was pursuing them.
Second, the article also highlights how another former close ally, Egypt, has now turned to russia - yet another example of how obama has failed, by damaging a once solid relationship an ally has turned away from the US. Talk about incompetence, how kerry the idiot is still sec'y of state no one can explain, but that's right; he works for the most incompetent, failed administration of the last 100 years, so its to be expected.
Last, regarding the 2 options to stop iran Hawaii4ever mentioned, only a military invasion is viable.
An internal rebellion has no chance to succeed, the regime will simply do what it did in 2009 and slaughter anyone it deems fit. A regime responsible for for 250,000 massacred in syria to keep its poodle assad in power will have no compunction about killing ten times that many in iran to retain its seat of power. Only an externally-driven military invasion can destroy the diseased regime of iran, something that should have been undertaken years, perhaps decades ago.
It has come down to either doing it now, before iran has completed its nuclear arms work, or after when the costs to do so would be much higher.
Lol....Iran will have nukes like much of the rest of the world and there isn't a damn thin anyone is going to do about it.
That isn't an apology but rather just the facts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Russia partnering with Egypt to build a power plant means Iran is going to nuke the world? Seriously?
City Data, bringing you news you didn't even know existed. 
