Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-09-2015, 12:01 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,159,948 times
Reputation: 21738

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
You're off topic but maybe Obama could just bribe the Iranians with arms as was the case with a prior great Commander in Chief.
To whom are you referring?

Both the Clinton and the Reagan Administrations purchased weapons from Iran.

During the Reagan Administration for the Contras; during the Clinton Administration for the Bosniaks and Kosovars.


The difference is that such sales were permitted during the Reagan Administration with presidential approval.

After that, all sales were barred, period.

Of course, Clinton did not buy weapons from thatIran.


Quote:
Originally Posted by MadisonR View Post
When you are way in over your head, and your factual knowledge is utterly dwarfed, it would be better not to speak on a topic.

With the 4th lie below, you are now added to my ignore box:

The US overthrew no one, mossadegh was appointed by the shah, who was already in power and whose powers regarding foreign policy and the military mossadegh illegally tried to usurp. It was iranians who removed mossadegh, not a single US official/person did anything of the kind.

You're clearly of very few facts and have little to offer outside of juvenile slogans. Likely to vanish with most of the other weak posters in the near term...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCityTheBridge View Post
If you cannot even recognize that there is a serious debate about Israeli policy in regard to the Occupied Territories, and even towards Arab Israelis, then it is you who are not serious.

You've got a warped view of history if you don't think the US overthrew Mossadegh. It is no longer a secret that US intelligence, in conjunction with British intelligence, arranged the coup that overthrew Mossadegh. The Secret CIA History of the Iran Coup, 1953

Talk about a non-entity lacking credibility.
Ahhhh...the dreaded "Ignore List."

Good for you.

More people need to stand against crap like that. A few other things you need to know. It was Kermit Roosevelt who got the call to plan the Mossadeq murder and coup. Kermit was a grandson of TR (if I recall correctly), and had a string of successful coups -- including the overthrow of the Greek government in 1948, plus electioneering in Italy and Germany after the war and on into the 50s.

A few members of the core group hired to murder Prime Minister Mossadeq, later became the MEK.

You can imagine how they felt about the duplicity of the US, who used them to put the Shah in power, then Shah immediately engages in human rights abuses, and so they're quite angry about having been used.

The MEK forms around 1964 or so and spends the next 15 hears trying to overthrow the Shah they put in power. They killed quite a few US government, military and civilian employees, which put them on the Terror List.

The MEK has since spent their time trying to overthrow the Ayatollahs.

Where it gets bizarre is Bush violates federal law and hires the MEK to interrogate -- torture -- Iraqis during the war, and the Iranians go along with it.

Even more bizarre is Clinton & Lake & Co illegally buying weapons from Iran to give to al-Qaida situated in Albania to smuggle the weapons to Bosniaks and Kosvars from 1994-1999.

The MEK goes back on the Terror List in October 1997 and remains until September 2012.

You have to wonder if re-listing the MEK as a Terror Group was done to facilitate the illegal arms trade with Iran.

In my view, Iran did the smart thing.....allowing the US to use the MEK allows Iran to identify and track MEK members.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCityTheBridge View Post
But someone who believes invasion and occupation is achievable is sober?
It is achievable.

I trained for it. That's how I know.

My battalion's mission was to seize and hold both bridges across the River Karun to allow British and American armor units to cross from Kuwait/Iraq into Iran. The mission of one company was to hold a hard-point so engineers could come up and roll out a pontoon bridge (you know, in case one or both of the other bridges got destroyed or traffic-jammed).

Yeah, and that was before we invaded Iraq (the first time).

If you know anyone who'll end up in the brigade on the Eastern Approach, you can tell them to thank me for that. I insisted a brigade could hold off the Iranian army there, so my bosses sent me to the NTC to prove it. All you need is constant air cover, an additional fires battalion and at least one additional mech infantry company attached for RACO support and it's a cinch.

The Iranian government collapses within 60-90 days.

Strategically...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-09-2015, 12:04 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,159,948 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
It's not enough that Team Obama is determined to make Iran a Nuclear Power -- they also want to degrade the USA Nuclear capabilities. Somehow -- they believe this will be a great thing for Obama's Legacy. You have to wonder what their End Game really is. Iran makes it clear every single Friday - the USA is the Big Satan and they chant "Death to America" in their Mosques, led by their Supreme Leader ...... our negotiating 'partner. It boggles the mind.

Is America's Nuclear Arsenal Dying? |Real Clear Defense 2/24/15
Please, that article is crap.


Michaela Dodge is a defense and strategic policy analyst in The Heritage Foundation’s AllisonCenter for Foreign and National Security Policy.

Dr. Adam Lowther is a research professor at the Air Force Research Institute.


The Heritage Foundation, a Left-Wing think-tank created in 1974 after the collapse of the Social Democrat Party run by Left-Wingers like Dr. (snicker) Henry Kissinger and Irving Kristol and all other others who fawn over Max Weber.

Quote:
Max Weber, (born April 21, 1864, Erfurt, Prussia [now Germany]—died June 14, 1920, Munich, Germany), German sociologist and political economist best known for his thesis of the “Protestant ethic,†relating Protestantism to capitalism, and for his ideas on bureaucracy. Weber’s profound influence on sociological theory stems from his demand for objectivity in scholarship and from his analysis of the motives behind human action.
Max Weber (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Weber was founder of the Social Democrat Party in Germany.

I'm too drunken to rip their stupidity to shreds and expose how they lied. I'll do it tomorrow. Today. Whatever.

Going to sleepy-land....


Dr. Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2015, 01:10 AM
 
847 posts, read 766,748 times
Reputation: 426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post

Reagan Administrations purchased weapons from Iran.
I believe you are referring to the sale of weapons to Iran during late stages of Iran-Iraq war.
not purchase of weapons from Iran. The so called move perpetuate the dual containment of Iran and Iraq during the 1980s.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post

The Iranian government collapses within 60-90 days.
So here is something I would consider a half truth.

here are few points:
Iranian Armed Forces capability is far greater now than It was 25 years ago.

The Iranian government would surely eventually collapse if the U.S decided to come in for a land invasion of Iran. Whether that will take one week or one month, or one year that will be harder to tell.

The real important question is what will be the cost? and what will be the consequences?

Iran is a very large country. It more than three times the size of Iraq. roughly twice the size of Turkey.
Iran is a very mountainous country. The Terrain is rather difficult and not at all similar to Iraq but rather much more like Afghanistan.

It will surely require far more numbers of U.S forces than Iraq did. and It will surely mean much higher casualty rates for our forces.

2nd consequences:
Here is the biggie. to south east of Iran there is Balouchestan Province of Iran. Pakistan has province just like that and has very little control over it. an Invasion of Iran will almost certainly mean instability in west of Pakistan and possibly upsetting the India/Pakistan Balance.

This will almost infiltration of forces back and forth form Afghanistan side via the massive border it shares with Iran. This will likely make Afghanistan far more unstable than it is today.

3rd consequence:
Kurds are Semi Autonomous in Iraq. They will likely demand Semi-autonomy in Iran which create massive political issues in Iran. but even more importantly because kurds have semi-autonomy in Syria as well. This will really create instability eastern region of Turkey. because the Turkish kurds will demand the same and Turkish military will try to crush them. but this time kurds Of Turkey will have greater logistical support form Iran, Iraq and Syria.

4th consequence:
North west of Iran
Armenia is land locked country with very little resources. It is occupying a piece of land since early 1990s that Azarbayejan Republic claims it belongs to them. Turkey and Azarbayejan are essentially on one side of this conflict Russia provides military support to Aremnia and Iran provides logistical support (most importantly access to ports and energy). Azarbayejani President (corrupt dictator enriched with oil money) will almost certainly attempt to take back that "occupied" land. Turkey will have to support Azarbayejan. This may lead to a Russian intervention.

5th consequence: Iran has certain historical disputes with Iraq over the "Shata-ol-arab" (aravand roud) water way this maybe which was one the causes of Iran-Iraq war and a skirmish in 1975.

6th consequence: Iran has certain Island disputes with UAE. This will almost certainly mean the UAE will try to stir up some trouble.

7th consequence: Iran has disputes with over the Caspian sea with neighboring countries (namely Russia which has a reasonable naval presence in the Caspian) This can certainly cause issues.

8th consequence: There are multitudes of ethnic and languages in Iran. each province
will try to be a winner in this new order. this will almost certainly upset the current "Balance" and create massive amount of tension.

9th consequence: The United States of America again has to be bugged for years in a country Central Asia. while China will be flexing its muscles and probably will fee There is an American power vacuum and thus try to impose its will on countries like Vietnam and even possibly Japan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2015, 07:45 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,264 posts, read 26,192,233 times
Reputation: 15636
Default GOP senators send warning on Iran deal

What was the point in sending a letter to Iran explaining the constitution, they should be unified in standing behind the administrations decision rather than 2nd guessing the negotiations.

Really a pointless letter.


Quote:
Forty-seven Senate Republicans are signaling in an open letter to Iran and the
White House that a deal over Tehran’s nuclear program will be at risk once
President Obama leaves office.

“It has come to our attention while observing your nuclear negotiations with
our government that you may not fully understand our constitutional system,†the
senators wrote in the letter, which was first reported by Bloomberg.
“Thus, we are writing to bring to your attention two features of our
Constitution — the power to make binding international agreements and the
different character of federal offices — which you should seriously consider as
negotiations progress.â€
GOP senators send warning on Iran deal | TheHill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2015, 07:47 AM
 
46,267 posts, read 27,088,282 times
Reputation: 11120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
What was the point in sending a letter to Iran explaining the constitution, they should be unified in standing behind the administrations decision rather than 2nd guessing the negotiations.

Really a pointless letter.




GOP senators send warning on Iran deal | TheHill
Maybe, just maybe, to tell them, that because Obama has a pen and a phone means he cannot make the deal all by himself....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2015, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,771,962 times
Reputation: 24863
I believe the Iran nuclear program is designed to make power reactors and not weapons. why make weapons when your secret intelligence people can steal or buy them from some other country. Building nuclear electric power or desalinization plants lets Persia sell more oil or grow more food. that makes sense for the Persians but not for the Saudi's and the Saudi's run American Mideast policy just behind the Zionists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2015, 07:53 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
What was the point in sending a letter to Iran explaining the constitution, they should be unified in standing behind the administrations decision rather than 2nd guessing the negotiations.

Really a pointless letter.

GOP senators send warning on Iran deal | TheHill
Doesn't the Constitution mention states rights? Oh wait Iran isn't one of our states, why are we getting involved?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2015, 08:10 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,516,836 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
What was the point in sending a letter to Iran explaining the constitution, they should be unified in standing behind the administrations decision rather than 2nd guessing the negotiations.

Really a pointless letter.

GOP senators send warning on Iran deal | TheHill
Is Obama the King now? Is it no longer Obama's sworn duty to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution? Is it not the power to approve international agreements reserved to the Senate in the Constitution?

All the Republicans have done is explained some basic facts about how our Constitution works, and therefore how our government works and why Obama's attempts to usurp powers that he does not actually have (by executive order) does not result in promises that they can depend on.

Now of course his narcissistic highness Barack Obama is not going to like people from the Senate effectively spreading the message that the emperor has no clothes. But it is something that everyone should be made aware of on this, including Barack Obama.

This letter was timely, appropriate and very well done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2015, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
2,423 posts, read 2,092,050 times
Reputation: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
I believe the Iran nuclear program is designed to make power reactors and not weapons. why make weapons when your secret intelligence people can steal or buy them from some other country. Building nuclear electric power or desalinization plants lets Persia sell more oil or grow more food. that makes sense for the Persians but not for the Saudi's and the Saudi's run American Mideast policy just behind the Zionists.
Or perhaps a Fanatical Islamic government is trying to establish an empire in the ME.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2015, 09:49 AM
 
Location: St. Louis
7,444 posts, read 7,014,485 times
Reputation: 4601
Default GOP Senators pen open letter to Iran: any deal can be undone...

..interesting move...

Republican senators warn Iran in open letter - Nick Gass - POLITICO


..apparently some in the leftist media are none too pleased:


With GOP's Iran Move, Politics Goes Beyond the Water's Edge - NBC News

This has the actual text:

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/0...nuclear-talks/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top