Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-26-2015, 03:06 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Nice deflection dude.
All you've done is deflect and use fear mongering through this whole thread. And now you are posting cartoons meant to entertain 10 year olds.. is this your level of thinking?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2015, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by HiFi View Post
Are you being serious urbanlife? You really do not understand this? For fcks sake it is not complicated. There is x amount of bandwidth available at a given time, how you split it effects how fast each get their data.
And how much bandwidth is available? You know bandwidth isn't oil, right? Though I think it is funny that you think this is all about providing the equal amount of bandwidth to everyone at the same time. We are not all watching movies at the same time in this country, this is about preventing internet providers from being able to regulate which sites they provide high speed access to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2015, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
All you've done is deflect and use fear mongering through this whole thread. And now you are posting cartoons meant to entertain 10 year olds.. is this your level of thinking?
False, unlike you, I understand the importance of these rules rather than succumbing to the power of Comcast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2015, 03:09 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
And how much bandwidth is available? You know bandwidth isn't oil, right? Though I think it is funny that you think this is all about providing the equal amount of bandwidth to everyone at the same time. We are not all watching movies at the same time in this country, this is about preventing internet providers from being able to regulate which sites they provide high speed access to.
Bandwith availability is different based upon region and if you're on cable, dsl, or satellite. one should know this if they are going to pretend to be able to discuss the need to regulate it.

Most indeed DO WATCH movies at the same time.. it tends to be Friday, Saturday evenings etc.. While downtime is early mornings and during the work day.

More evidence you dont have a clue
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2015, 03:11 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,108,083 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
False, unlike you, I understand the importance of these rules rather than succumbing to the power of Comcast.
You've done nothing but post wrong information through this whole thread, and we're supposed to believe you understand rules governing this wrong information?

NOT

But hey, you do know how to say "Comcast" a lot.. must be on your daily enemy talking point list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2015, 03:13 PM
 
1,160 posts, read 713,828 times
Reputation: 473
In my opinion, this is good for users of the internet. The last thing we want is the ISP's offering a cable-like bundle of channels (websites). On the other hand, this is not very good for tax payers. Most certainly the government will see this utility service as an untapped revenue source. I know for certain democrats want to add a tax onto peoples cell phone bills to pay for some sort of education initiative (I did polling on it).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2015, 03:14 PM
 
Location: North Idaho
2,395 posts, read 3,012,542 times
Reputation: 2934
Here are three charts that show that the FCC is full of malarkey:



Over the period covered, the variety and speed of Internet connections has increased significantly, not an outcome one would expect if monopoly or controlled market conditions were in place




Over 80% of households have at least two providers who offer at least 10 mbps downstream. 96% of households have at least two providers offering at least 6 Mbps downstream.



And finally, as a general measure of the health of the Internet in the U.S., we rank very near the top in data transferred per user, and way above the average.

As with most fed.gov regulation, I am afraid this will be twisted to the advantage of the large companies, and will create problems that did not exist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2015, 03:17 PM
 
15,530 posts, read 10,501,555 times
Reputation: 15812
Just wait, they are dreaming up new ways to tax as we type.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2015, 03:17 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Bandwith availability is different based upon region and if you're on cable, dsl, or satellite. one should know this if they are going to pretend to be able to discuss the need to regulate it.

Most indeed DO WATCH movies at the same time.. it tends to be Friday, Saturday evenings etc.. While downtime is early mornings and during the work day.

More evidence you dont have a clue
And you want to let your internet provider limit this and control which sites you can watch your movies on.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
You've done nothing but post wrong information through this whole thread, and we're supposed to believe you understand rules governing this wrong information?

NOT

But hey, you do know how to say "Comcast" a lot.. must be on your daily enemy talking point list.
So how much does Comcast pay you to be against something that is bad for them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2015, 03:18 PM
i7pXFLbhE3gq
 
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cnynrat View Post
Here are three charts that show that the FCC is full of malarkey:



Over the period covered, the variety and speed of Internet connections has increased significantly, not an outcome one would expect if monopoly or controlled market conditions were in place
Irrelevant. Has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
Quote:
Over 80% of households have at least two providers who offer at least 10 mbps downstream. 96% of households have at least two providers offering at least 6 Mbps downstream.
Also irrelevant and has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
Quote:
And finally, as a general measure of the health of the Internet in the U.S., we rank very near the top in data transferred per user, and way above the average.
Also irrelevant and has nothing to do with the issue at hand.

Quote:
As with most fed.gov regulation, I am afraid this will be twisted to the advantage of the large companies, and will create problems that did not exist.
That must be why the large service providers fought it so hard. They're out to hurt themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top