Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-12-2015, 05:03 PM
 
3,555 posts, read 4,093,945 times
Reputation: 1632

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
It says I'm a free speech advocate, I'll double down on free speech.
Did they go to jail?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-12-2015, 05:18 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,911 posts, read 10,582,210 times
Reputation: 16439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grsz11 View Post
Did they go to jail?
It doesn't matter if they didn't go to jail. Like we have said over and over in this tread and posted cases to prove it, a public school or other public entity can't take adverse action against someone based on the content of their speech.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2015, 06:00 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,962,294 times
Reputation: 7315
It was a great surprise (pleasant) to see SAE has endorsed the expulsions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2015, 06:11 PM
 
15,355 posts, read 12,638,570 times
Reputation: 7571
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
No, you do. There are many ways to punish people for exercising their rights without jailing them.
and this is why you dont understand Free Speech.

You think any negative reaction to your words is unconstitutional and that isnt how it works.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2015, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Riding the light...
1,635 posts, read 1,813,136 times
Reputation: 1162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grsz11 View Post
Did they go to jail?
Jail = punishment
Expulsion = punishment

Did they get punished? Yes

As a result of Due Process? NO! There was no due process to justify expulsion.

Quote:
There is no listed procedure allowing the school’s president to unilaterally punish any student, let alone expel them. Instead, there is a clear process to be followed, with extra safeguards for students facing expulsion that would be virtually impossible to meet in the two days.

For example, the code clearly states that conducting investigations is the prerogative of the Student Conduct Office, and that any punishment must be preceded by ordering an accused student to attend a “mandatory meeting†to hear and, if the student wishes, answer the allegations against them. Students have at least a five-day window to have this meeting, unless prompt action is “essential†due to a substantial safety concern or the imminent end of a semester.
Quote:
Student Conduct can only suggest a punishment following this mandatory meeting, and if the student disagrees, the student is allowed to request a full hearing, which is not an appeals body but rather assesses the case independently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2015, 09:31 PM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,432,323 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by billydaman View Post
Once again, as stated by the university, they were expelled for leading and creating a hostile environment. They were not punished for singing a song.
Wrong.

The university president was obviously trying to cover his behind by giving a false reason.

Anyone can see right through it.

They were expelled for singing a racist song.

Period.

Quote:
I do not think you understand the point....speech can be legally punitive.
Don't you mean "legally punished"?

It would help for you to get your terminology straight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2015, 09:45 PM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,432,323 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miker2069 View Post
Nope - they'd lose because the basis of their argument would be disproved and thereby dismissed. They'd insinuate they were expelled for their speech and it was not - it was code of conduct violation by creating a hostile environment for black students.
How could they create a hostile environment for black students if no black students were there?

They obviously couldn't.

And once the video was put on social media, the only effect that it would have had on the black students who happened to see it (and they would have had to make an effort to do so by either going on the web or tuning into the news) would be the shocking revelation that there were some racist frat boys on campus.

Oh, the horror!

As if their peace of mind necessarily depended on the notion that there couldn't possibly be any racist frat boys on campus.

That notion is self-evidently absurd.

Courts don't automatically accept the reasons that defendants give for their actions.

If they did, then defendants in civil rights cases would always win.

For example, a white who fired a black for racist reasons could simply say he did it for other reasons.

Case closed! Judgement for the white racist defendant!

In this case, the defendant (the university) would be claiming that the expulsion was for creating a hostile environment.

On the contrary, it is obvious that the expulsion was for singing a racist song in private.

Furthermore, it is obvious that the university did it to protects its reputation.

The university president couldn't care less about anything else, including blacks.

Last edited by dechatelet; 03-12-2015 at 10:28 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2015, 09:50 PM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,432,323 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by theroc5156 View Post
If they weren't expelled, what do you think would be proper punishment?

Personally, I think an old-fashioned ass-whupping would suffice, but wouldn't be productive in the long run. I would make them volunteer at the NAACP or any other group that forwards the interests of African-Americans (after smacking the ***** out of them for a bit).
People should be punished for being racist? Really?

I thought this was supposed to be a free country.

The only punishment they deserved was the punishment they were going to get anyway.

Being embarrassed and shamed in public for what they did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2015, 09:57 PM
 
15,355 posts, read 12,638,570 times
Reputation: 7571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temp43k View Post
Jail = punishment
Expulsion = punishment

Did they get punished? Yes

As a result of Due Process? NO! There was no due process to justify expulsion.
So you are suggesting a state employee can sing about lynching blacks or killing whites and keep his job?

Yeah...no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2015, 10:14 PM
 
1,160 posts, read 713,395 times
Reputation: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
Wrong.

The university president was obviously trying to cover his behind by giving a false reason.

Prove it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top