Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2015, 03:07 PM
 
4,738 posts, read 4,433,724 times
Reputation: 2485

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adhom View Post
If they win this lawsuit, I would advise all restaurants to never serve people with such allergies in the future. It's just not worth the risk.

Good luck with that.

Seems to me, and i'm now lawyer, you can't discriminate against people with disabilities like that.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Adhom View Post
If they win this lawsuit, I would advise all restaurants to never serve people with such allergies in the future. It's just not worth the risk.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Adhom View Post
Although in some ways, I can understand why the family HAD to sue the restaurant. From a psychological standpoint, it's too much responsibility for the parents to bear if they had to concede that their irresponsibility had caused their son's death.
1 - what caused the kids death is, as far as I know, unclear. This is the first hurdle of the lawsuit. what if it wasn't the pancakes (what if it was syrup? etc)

2 - if a restaurant agrees to do something (clean grill, not use dairy, etc) and it mistakenly does it. . .that could be a reason to go after restaurant.

3 - parents have a lot to be blamed about here though. Eating without epipen. not calling 9/11 right away etc.


Personally - I would only fine against the restaurant IF they violated the agreement they made with the family.

 
Old 03-18-2015, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Ohio
2,801 posts, read 2,309,108 times
Reputation: 1654
I have empathy for the family BUT ... WHY would you take your child with SERIOUS food allergies to a public restaurant where the ingredients of the menu items can NOT be guaranteed AND without his emergency EpiPen..
 
Old 03-18-2015, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,533,269 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
Quite a lot was lacking in that story.

Was the grill not "decontaminated" enough? Was milk accidentally put in the batter? Was the wrong order delivered?

For most scenarios I can guess about, if I were on the jury, it would take extreme negligence or a willful act for me to award the family anything.
I agree. When someone has severe allergies, you don't order anything that could possibly contain the allergen. Pancakes are routinely made with milk and it's too easy to mix up the batters or not realize that the one you add water too actually has milk solids in the dry mix. There is no way I would let my child order pancakes in a restaurant if he had a severe allergy to milk products. They are used too much in restaurant cooking.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top