Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-09-2015, 09:57 AM
 
299 posts, read 186,927 times
Reputation: 200

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
I saw another article say the same thing like a few days ago. The Iranians have been saying all week that what Obama told the American people about the framework isn't all correct

http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/04...out-nuke-deal/

Last edited by GritsCode; 04-09-2015 at 10:28 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2015, 10:02 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
2,423 posts, read 2,090,185 times
Reputation: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericsami View Post
yes never mind that IAEA has already visited the place twice.
but because of pushes by western intel agencies they want to go to visit a place again that they previously found no evidence in.

Parchin - Iran Special Weapons Facilities

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...011701017.html
Reject Reject ericsami says! Reject primary sources because they do not agree with me!

Ok, the IAEA got to visit a portion of Parchin in 2005. Ten years later and there is no possible way that Parchin could of been developed over time? This matter could easily be cleared up if the Iranian government allows inspectors to access Parchin, legally binded under the NPT. But even according to your source you provided, Iran refuses to allow access. What are they hiding?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2015, 10:06 AM
 
299 posts, read 186,927 times
Reputation: 200
I just find quite interesting that Iran is insisting on having all sanctions removed upfront and not over time. it seems they are up to something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2015, 10:08 AM
 
847 posts, read 766,412 times
Reputation: 426
Iranian foreign minister has been basically busy miss-representing things to his parliament and committees.

He keeps emphasizing They will have 6000 centrifuges running. Never mentioning that their design is 1950s design not the latest and greatest IR-8 centrifuges that are something like 1000 times more efficient. Never mentioning that many of the centrifuges will breakdown.

HE of course can't tell his people his negotiated a terrible framework agreement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2015, 10:13 AM
 
299 posts, read 186,927 times
Reputation: 200
"A bill sponsored by Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) that would allow Congress to reject the terms of the agreement, restore the legislature’s ability to impose and lift sanctions on the Islamic Republic, and compel the White House to certify that Iran is not involved in terrorist activities against the United States and its interests is gaining support. There’s just one problem: The White House has pledged to veto it."

http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/0...acking-the-u-s

Seems a lot of things aren't going well right now
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2015, 10:18 AM
 
847 posts, read 766,412 times
Reputation: 426
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMoreJuice View Post
Reject Reject ericsami says! Reject primary sources because they do not agree with me!

Ok, the IAEA got to visit a portion of Parchin in 2005. Ten years later and there is no possible way that Parchin could of been developed over time? This matter could easily be cleared up if the Iranian government allows inspectors to access Parchin, legally binded under the NPT. But even according to your source you provided, Iran refuses to allow access. What are they hiding?
I have not rejected the primary source. I in fact fed you the story. the Agency wants to visit a site once again Fed to them by Western Intel. Of course if you were interested in the truth you would have noticed that the military base was visited multiple times before.

But the West probably wants to know what kind of Missiles are stored there, how many, what kind to complete a list of hit list spots when a time ever comes for military actions or verify or rejected intels fed to them from MEK.

There is a limit to humiliation a country will put up with.

Even Hans Blix and other Inspectors have warned against the politicization of the Agency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2015, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Louisiana
9,137 posts, read 5,798,959 times
Reputation: 7706
I still wonder why Iran is developing ICBMs
if they're not planning to put nukes on em.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2015, 02:33 PM
 
847 posts, read 766,412 times
Reputation: 426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speleothem View Post
I still wonder why Iran is developing ICBMs
if they're not planning to put nukes on em.
Ballistic Missile is a very different notion than ICBM.

Missiles with range of 1500 miles is hardly considered Inter continental.


and they are developing it for deterrence. why every other country that has them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2015, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,457,152 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericsami View Post
Iranian foreign minister has been basically busy miss-representing things to his parliament and committees.

He keeps emphasizing They will have 6000 centrifuges running. Never mentioning that their design is 1950s design not the latest and greatest IR-8 centrifuges that are something like 1000 times more efficient. Never mentioning that many of the centrifuges will breakdown.

HE of course can't tell his people his negotiated a terrible framework agreement.
Iran exaggerates its military prowess and progress for home consumption. Their stealth fighter unveiling was a big joke as were their photo-shopped missile launches and drone program. They'll come to a nuclear agreement but have to save face at home.

Analysis: Iranian ICBM claim falls short of the mark - IHS Jane's 360

Fake stealth plane: Iran's Photoshopped fighter jet spotted in the air! | Daily Mail Online

In an Iranian Image, a Missile Too Many - image digitally altered
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2015, 03:01 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,457,152 times
Reputation: 8599
What a clusterfudge - but again it's Shiite vs Sunni:
Here is what’s happening in Yemen - The Washington Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top