Iran And World Powers Agree On Framework For Nuclear Deal (claim, propaganda)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I saw another article say the same thing like a few days ago. The Iranians have been saying all week that what Obama told the American people about the framework isn't all correct
yes never mind that IAEA has already visited the place twice.
but because of pushes by western intel agencies they want to go to visit a place again that they previously found no evidence in.
Reject Reject ericsami says! Reject primary sources because they do not agree with me!
Ok, the IAEA got to visit a portion of Parchin in 2005. Ten years later and there is no possible way that Parchin could of been developed over time? This matter could easily be cleared up if the Iranian government allows inspectors to access Parchin, legally binded under the NPT. But even according to your source you provided, Iran refuses to allow access. What are they hiding?
Iranian foreign minister has been basically busy miss-representing things to his parliament and committees.
He keeps emphasizing They will have 6000 centrifuges running. Never mentioning that their design is 1950s design not the latest and greatest IR-8 centrifuges that are something like 1000 times more efficient. Never mentioning that many of the centrifuges will breakdown.
HE of course can't tell his people his negotiated a terrible framework agreement.
"A bill sponsored by Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) that would allow Congress to reject the terms of the agreement, restore the legislature’s ability to impose and lift sanctions on the Islamic Republic, and compel the White House to certify that Iran is not involved in terrorist activities against the United States and its interests is gaining support. There’s just one problem: The White House has pledged to veto it."
Reject Reject ericsami says! Reject primary sources because they do not agree with me!
Ok, the IAEA got to visit a portion of Parchin in 2005. Ten years later and there is no possible way that Parchin could of been developed over time? This matter could easily be cleared up if the Iranian government allows inspectors to access Parchin, legally binded under the NPT. But even according to your source you provided, Iran refuses to allow access. What are they hiding?
I have not rejected the primary source. I in fact fed you the story. the Agency wants to visit a site once again Fed to them by Western Intel. Of course if you were interested in the truth you would have noticed that the military base was visited multiple times before.
But the West probably wants to know what kind of Missiles are stored there, how many, what kind to complete a list of hit list spots when a time ever comes for military actions or verify or rejected intels fed to them from MEK.
There is a limit to humiliation a country will put up with.
Even Hans Blix and other Inspectors have warned against the politicization of the Agency.
Iranian foreign minister has been basically busy miss-representing things to his parliament and committees.
He keeps emphasizing They will have 6000 centrifuges running. Never mentioning that their design is 1950s design not the latest and greatest IR-8 centrifuges that are something like 1000 times more efficient. Never mentioning that many of the centrifuges will breakdown.
HE of course can't tell his people his negotiated a terrible framework agreement.
Iran exaggerates its military prowess and progress for home consumption. Their stealth fighter unveiling was a big joke as were their photo-shopped missile launches and drone program. They'll come to a nuclear agreement but have to save face at home.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.