Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-15-2015, 06:07 PM
 
2,842 posts, read 2,328,064 times
Reputation: 3386

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
He's not just some guy in possession of a gun. He robbed a Wal Mart for the gun, set fire to a church, shot the weapon in public and is now ignoring commands of police officers heading towards a densely populated area.
Agreed. The cop did the right thing. Good job!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2015, 06:13 PM
 
Location: Inyokern, CA
1,609 posts, read 1,079,040 times
Reputation: 549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
The thing is the cop HAD to make a quick choice since the perp could've leveled his gun AND shot 1 of the cops.
or anyone(s) in sight. The cop did the right thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2015, 06:15 PM
 
1,198 posts, read 1,179,694 times
Reputation: 1530
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The police aren't suppose to shoot simply because someone is in possession of a gun. Training, training, training.
He was a violent criminal heading into a populated area that had already discharge the weapon and displayed suicidal behavior. Had he shot a few random people before turning the gun on himself, you would still be saying training training training. Cops are damned if they do and damned if they don't.

I suppose running him over seems excessive, but the guy had a high powered rifle that is far more accurate than an officers side arm, and it's capable of shooting through a bullet proof vest and even most parts of a squad car, so I doubt they wanted to get in a shootout with him before the swat team showed up.

He had his chance to surrender, and he failed to comply. honestly, he's luck to be alive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2015, 06:21 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,184,586 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucky4life View Post
He was a violent criminal heading into a populated area that had already discharge the weapon and displayed suicidal behavior. Had he shot a few random people before turning the gun on himself, you would still be saying training training training. Cops are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
He hadn't harmed anyone. Maybe he had PTSD and have been waiting months to get into the V.A. and finally snapped? Do we know? But look at all the posts.....kill him, kill him, kill him, without having idea what started all of this or why.

Quote:
I suppose running him over seems excessive, but the guy had a high powered rifle that is far more accurate than an officers side arm, and it's capable of shooting through a bullet proof vest and even most parts of a squad car, so I doubt they wanted to get in a shootout with him before the swat team showed up.

He had his chance to surrender, and he failed to comply. honestly, he's luck to be alive.
Maybe the police need better training to deal with people with possible mental issues?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2015, 06:39 PM
 
2,842 posts, read 2,328,064 times
Reputation: 3386
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
He hadn't harmed anyone. Maybe he had PTSD and have been waiting months to get into the V.A. and finally snapped? Do we know? But look at all the posts.....kill him, kill him, kill him, without having idea what started all of this or why.



Maybe the police need better training to deal with people with possible mental issues?
If some guy is walking down the street shooting a rifle into the air after robbing a store and threatening to kill himself, then as far as I'm concerned he's a deadly threat. He is just as likely to kill some innocent child with one of those stray bullets as he is to shoot an officer. Stop and think about the innocent people in the neighborhood being terrorized by this nutcase. Most murderers are mentally ill, but we don't just give them a pass and let them keep on gunning for our kids. The cops did the right thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2015, 06:45 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,899,930 times
Reputation: 5948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
My opinion of the video shifted 180 degrees once I saw that the suspect had a rifle to his head and then earlier had been shooting into the air. The police would have been justified in shooting him. Running him down with a patrol car was unique problem solving but caused damage the taxpayers will have to pay. Still, if the guy lived maybe that was best. Then again, if he ends up suing, again the tax payers will have to pay. Why didn't they just shoot him again?
It would've taken time for a cop to stop his car; grab his gun and start shooting. By then the perp could've leveled his rifle and gotten off a few shots. IMHO the perp was NOT watching where all the squad cars were and the 1 cop saw his opening to nail the fool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2015, 06:49 PM
 
1,160 posts, read 713,605 times
Reputation: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
The thing is the cop HAD to make a quick choice since the perp could've leveled his gun AND shot 1 of the cops.

Although I support the actions of the cop 100%, I cant stand the need to dehumanize people. You see it all the time with "perp" "scumbag" etc etc. Should this guy be held responsible for his behavior, yes absolutely, to the fullest extent of the law....should we gleefully watch as he gets ran over and cheer when it occurs? Not saying you specifically are cheering but to me its disgusting how you try to relegate this guy to sub human status and others cheer or are almost giddy this person was ran over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2015, 06:52 PM
 
1,198 posts, read 1,179,694 times
Reputation: 1530
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
He hadn't harmed anyone. Maybe he had PTSD and have been waiting months to get into the V.A. and finally snapped? Do we know? But look at all the posts.....kill him, kill him, kill him, without having idea what started all of this or why.



Maybe the police need better training to deal with people with possible mental issues?
Police receive a ton of training on how to deal with crazy people or people under the influence of drugs or alcohol. They also have a lot experience with them because they deal with it on a daily basis.


Who cares if he had PTSD. He was obviously completely nuts because no sane person would do what he did. That's not the officers problem. His job was to protect the general public and enforce the law. He did his job by making a split decision that resulted in zero fatalities.

Had this guy stayed in one spot, law enforcement could have blocked the area and continue to negotiate with him, but he refused to listen to them and decided he wanted to walk into an area with innocent people while firing a stolen rifle. Honestly, what were those cops supposed to do? You keep saying "training," but when a crazy gunman refuses to negotiate and is headed towards innocent people, they really aren't left with too many options


You're probably a nice person, but you simply don't know what cops do, and why they can't always be everyone's friend. Your view of the world is not in a perspective in relation to how it actually operates, which makes scenarios like this very upsetting to you because you ultimately don't understand what this man was capable of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2015, 07:11 PM
 
2,842 posts, read 2,328,064 times
Reputation: 3386
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucky4life View Post
Police receive a ton of training on how to deal with crazy people or people under the influence of drugs or alcohol. They also have a lot experience with them because they deal with it on a daily basis.


Who cares if he had PTSD. He was obviously completely nuts because no sane person would do what he did. That's not the officers problem. His job was to protect the general public and enforce the law. He did his job by making a split decision that resulted in zero fatalities.

Had this guy stayed in one spot, law enforcement could have blocked the area and continue to negotiate with him, but he refused to listen to them and decided he wanted to walk into an area with innocent people while firing a stolen rifle. Honestly, what were those cops supposed to do? You keep saying "training," but when a crazy gunman refuses to negotiate and is headed towards innocent people, they really aren't left with too many options


You're probably a nice person, but you simply don't know what cops do, and why they can't always be everyone's friend. Your view of the world is not in a perspective in relation to how it actually operates, which makes scenarios like this very upsetting to you because you ultimately don't understand what this man was capable of.
^^^^
THIS!

Nobody wants to see anyone hurt, but sometimes it's unavoidable. Well said Lucky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2015, 07:11 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,899,930 times
Reputation: 5948
Quote:
Originally Posted by billydaman View Post
Although I support the actions of the cop 100%, I cant stand the need to dehumanize people. You see it all the time with "perp" "scumbag" etc etc. Should this guy be held responsible for his behavior, yes absolutely, to the fullest extent of the law....should we gleefully watch as he gets ran over and cheer when it occurs? Not saying you specifically are cheering but to me its disgusting how you try to relegate this guy to sub human status and others cheer or are almost giddy this person was ran over.
Perp is shorthand for "perpetrator", it's NOT a slur. The rifle toting dude was def that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top