Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-12-2015, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,786,069 times
Reputation: 6663

Advertisements

A message from Our America Initiative:

Important Wednesday (May 13) on Presidential Debate Lawsuit

In 2012, four candidates for U.S. President qualified for enough states’ ballots to potentially achieve a majority in the Electoral College. Only four.
One of those candidates was Gov. Gary Johnson, nominee of the Libertarian Party. The others were Dr. Jill Stein, nominee of the Green Party, and of course, President Obama and Gov. Romney, the two “major” party candidates.

Yet, when it came time for the traditional -- and critical -- nationally televised debates, only Obama and Romney were invited. That is a travesty, and it happened for a reason.

In 1987, the Republican and Democratic National Committees got together and created a private, but official-sounding organization called the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD). Their stated purpose was to seize control of the general election debates -- and exclude “third” parties and their candidates from participating.

They succeeded, in a move that the previous, nonpartisan debate sponsor, the League of Women Voters accurately charged would “perpetrate a fraud on the American voter”.

As you may know, leaders of the Green Party, including Ralph Nader, have protested this blatant Republican-Democrat debate duopoly loudly and consistently. So far, the CPD and its two-party bosses have ignored those protests and continued to use an arbitrary polling threshold to exclude any candidates other than their own. They have even gone so far as to require their own nominees, such as Obama and Romney, to agree in writing that they will NOT participate in any debates other than those sponsored by the CPD.

Today, with polls showing a majority of Americans do not believe that either the Republican or Democrat Party represents their views, the demand for fair, open debates has never been greater.

That’s why the Green Party, the Libertarian Party, Dr. Stein, Gov. Johnson and their respective 2012 vice-presidential nominees have prepared a lawsuit to challenge the CPD in federal court -- a lawsuit that will show how the CPD violates anti-trust laws and unfairly limits voters’ choices.

Your support of this lawsuit is essential. The CPD is backed financially by major corporations with unlimited resources. The Republicans and Democrats will spend whatever they think it takes to protect their duopoly, and we must have the resources to prevail.

Wednesday, May 13, the legal team and key members in the movement, are hosting a Google Hangout to discuss the lawsuit, outline the strategy and talk about the need for both financial and grassroots support for this critical fight. It will begin at 9:00 p.m. ET / 6:00 p.m. PT.
You can join by simply going to - https://plus.google.com/events/csv8oi1sekdi5ukgl11pk23024k

We hope you will join us Wednesday night and learn more about our effort to literally change the political landscape -- and give independent voices a chance to be heard on the national debate stage.

______________________________

Like we Libertarians have said for years; both parties are only interested in protecting the status quo of the political class and their cronies, rather than the peoples interests.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2015, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,735,123 times
Reputation: 9325
Let's hope they win the lawsuit.

But I would think pressuring the broadcasters would be a more effective solution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2015, 12:19 PM
 
364 posts, read 277,475 times
Reputation: 123
It says its from 2012....what about 2015/2016?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2015, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,786,069 times
Reputation: 6663
The last debates were in 2012, and this is what the lawsuit is about. The actual round table is tomorrow, and the law suit is indeed alive and well. I hope they win it prior to the 2015/16 debates. I won;t hold my breath, but I'll always hope.



RAND PAUL 2016

P.S.

Libertarian Party PR
http://www.lp.org/blogs/staff/import...debate-lawsuit

Green Party PR
http://www.gp.org/green-party-press-.../details/4/797
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top