Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The concept of asking for or demanding a raise is completely lost on right-wingers.
Hardly, that concept would be lost on liberals. Liberals aren't "asking for a raise" they're demanding that government FORCE employers to pay someone more.
"right wingers" ask for a raise and if they don't get it either find other employment that will pay more or live with it. Liberals will whine and cry about how unfair life is and demand that someone take care of them.
The concept of asking for or demanding a raise is completely lost on right-wingers.
What are you taking about? All the right have been begging you guys to ask. You on the left want to put a gun on people's head and force them to pay you above fair market rate! Somehow that is holier!
There are plenty. Salary survey is what both employees and employers typically use to see how much a position should be compensated. Welcome to Salary.com! - Salary.com has some good information but many employers would purchase salary surveys.
If someone is not good enough to do a better job, why should that person get a raise?
That website just says what the salary is right now it has nothing to do with what it should be. So if someone can only do so much they should be punished for not being able to do more? We are talking about people here people who need money from jobs to survive.
Raising the minimum wage would not be sustainable for businesses, and Los Angeles, sadly, is going to find out the hard way. A burger flipper at McDonald's cannot command the same money as a computer tech or a doctor or a firefighter or a manager of a small business. Different jobs are on different levels and there's no getting around that concept. You can't just give people an amount they haven't earned.
$15 an hour in L.A. will get you a shack with no plumbing somewhere deep inside enemy territory...like Leimert Park.
This puzzled me at first, until I realized you're a right-winger and Leimart Park has a prominent black population.
Then it made perfect sense.
The more your ilk complains, the better I feel about this change to the law.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer
So now it's a right to live where we want? Even if we can't afford it?
Every city needs a strong working class population to thrive, not the third world extreme wealth/extreme poverty structure right-wingers are clamoring for. No thanks.
This puzzled me at first, until I realized you're a right-winger and Leimart Park has a prominent black population.
Then it made perfect sense.
The more your ilk complains, the better I feel about this change to the law.
Every city needs a strong working class population to thrive, not the third world extreme wealth/extreme poverty structure right-wingers are clamoring for. No thanks.
Exactly sometimes I wonder if right wingers think the US going full blown third world is a good thing? They think the less equal it is the more "liberty" there is.
$15 an hour in L.A. will get you a shack with no plumbing somewhere deep inside enemy territory...like Leimert Park.
What really? do California taxes take out like 50 percent of your paycheck or something?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
