Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-25-2015, 06:36 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,290,738 times
Reputation: 14274

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
It was all over the news at the time and there are numerous articles on it. Cheney's company made over 39 billion on the war. I actually don't blame bush for the war....I blame cheney for the false info getting us into this needless war.
Sorry to burst your bubble but, Haliburton was NOT Chaney's "company" at the time. He had severed his connections.

Did he own stock? Yes. Just as tens of thousands of other Americans did.

Heck. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that YOUR IRA or 401K had STOCK.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-25-2015, 06:53 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,290,738 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
[/b]

What war on terror. What did saddam do to us.....absolutely nothing.
" What did saddam do to us.....absolutely nothing"

"Originally Posted by natalie469 "It was all over the news at the time and there are numerous articles on it"

I though you followed the news and read articles on it?

An honest question. Have you EVER read the Authorization Bill giving the REASONS?

If you HAD, maybe you should then you wouldn't makes such ignorant statements!


Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 07:06 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,371,773 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by blind melon View Post
If Bush didnt lie than he is the most incompetent and.gullible president because I along with many others knew there were no WMDs.

So either a lair or a.bumbling idiot, take.your pick makes no difference to me
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Yeah, Ted Kennedy too!

"And the Administration has offered no persuasive evidence that Saddam would transfer chemical or biological weapons of mass destruction to Al Qaeda or any other terrorist organization. As General Joseph Hoar, the former Commander of Central Command told the members of the Armed Services Committee, a case has not been made to connect Al Qaeda and Iraq."

Speech Against the Invasion of Iraq | In His Own Words | Edward M. Kennedy

Maybe the brain cancer was already making him delusional, but he seems convinced that WMDs did exits such that they could be transferred to terrorists organizations.

His contention was that there was no evidence that Hussein would transfer them to terrorists organizations.

That sure is a long way from "don`t exist", ain`t it?

Of course that was before the 2004 general election when Democrats had to invent some **** to throw at Bush.


The left`s arguments against the war prior to the invasion were that biological and chemical weapons could be used against US troops, presently secure WMDs could be lost in the chaos of war, biological and chemical weapons could be used against civilians and that Hussein might make a final stand with his WMDs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
What does it matter what ted kennedy said. The war was george's call.

Whether Hussein had WMDs before the war or not, you and blind melon knew less about Hussein`s WMDs than Ted Kennedy and he believed they were weapons that could be transferred to terrorists but that no evidence existed that they would be transferred to terrorists.

The difference that it makes is that you and blind melon apparently knew something that Ted Kennedy didn`t know and that means you and blind melon are full of ****.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 07:51 AM
 
7,578 posts, read 5,324,132 times
Reputation: 9447
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Bob Woodward can't buy enough lipstick to put on that pig. Nice try though I must admit.
He could own the lipstick factory and it wouldn't help.

Search the 935 Iraq War false statements | Center for Public Integrity
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 10:23 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,832,973 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWiseWino View Post
He could own the lipstick factory and it wouldn't help.

Search the 935 Iraq War false statements | Center for Public Integrity
funny how they leave out every democrat that similar statements. this is just a hit piece against republicans and nothing more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 10:41 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 21 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,550 posts, read 16,536,658 times
Reputation: 6033
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Whether Hussein had WMDs before the war or not, you and blind melon knew less about Hussein`s WMDs than Ted Kennedy and he believed they were weapons that could be transferred to terrorists but that no evidence existed that they would be transferred to terrorists.

The difference that it makes is that you and blind melon apparently knew something that Ted Kennedy didn`t know and that means you and blind melon are full of ****.
You are making a false claim. Ted Kennedy knew the same thing the other senators knew, which was the information the Bush administration provided to them. That information was wrong, it is that simple.

You continuously naming prominent democrats and using the fallacy of " you are claiming to know more than they did, or you obviously didnt know more than they did" doesnt change the fact that the information they had was wrong.


The guy who briefed President Bush said that the Bush Administration lied. What better answer do you need ???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,643 posts, read 26,371,773 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
You are making a false claim. Ted Kennedy knew the same thing the other senators knew, which was the information the Bush administration provided to them. That information was wrong, it is that simple.

You continuously naming prominent democrats and using the fallacy of " you are claiming to know more than they did, or you obviously didnt know more than they did" doesnt change the fact that the information they had was wrong.


The guy who briefed President Bush said that the Bush Administration lied. What better answer do you need ???



"The guy"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 11:05 AM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,832,973 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
You are making a false claim. Ted Kennedy knew the same thing the other senators knew, which was the information the Bush administration provided to them. That information was wrong, it is that simple.

You continuously naming prominent democrats and using the fallacy of " you are claiming to know more than they did, or you obviously didnt know more than they did" doesnt change the fact that the information they had was wrong.


The guy who briefed President Bush said that the Bush Administration lied. What better answer do you need ???
still trying to rewrite history are you? still buying into the democrat lies are you? the truth is that the intelligence that bush provided as reason to invade iraq, was THE SAME INTELLIGENCE that clinton used, and provided congress, as much as two years before bush was elected. nice try but you fail again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 11:07 AM
 
934 posts, read 595,321 times
Reputation: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
still trying to rewrite history are you? still buying into the democrat lies are you? the truth is that the intelligence that bush provided as reason to invade iraq, was THE SAME INTELLIGENCE that clinton used, and provided congress, as much as two years before bush was elected. nice try but you fail again.
Clinton didn't invade Iraq Bush did
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2015, 11:14 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 21 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,550 posts, read 16,536,658 times
Reputation: 6033
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
"The guy"?
Michael Morrell, the one in the video a page back admitting that the Bush administration lied.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top