Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-30-2015, 05:23 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,796 posts, read 40,994,120 times
Reputation: 62169

Advertisements

"Elderly people will be treated like second-class citizens and denied medical care under new UN targets which give priority to saving the lives of young people. The NHS could be led to discriminate against the over 70s to meet ‘highly unethical’ UN health targets which seek to reduce premature deaths in younger people, senior medics have warned. Under the proposed Sustainable Development Goals, UN member states will be given targets to cut the number of deaths from diseases like cancer, stroke, diabetes and dementia by one third by 2030. However because many are age-related illnesses people who succumb to those diseases from the age of 70 are not deemed to have died prematurely and so are not included in the target...If the target was met, around 42,000 lives would be saved each year for the under 70s. However if older people were included in the target an extra 130,000 lives would be saved. "

Elderly face NHS discrimination under new UN death targets - Telegraph

The UK article then goes on to say there is already age discrimination in surgery and cancer care.

Now, it could be that this new thing is normal UN posturing where they set some lofty goals and countries just ignore them so, it's nothing to get excited about. They have zero enforcement clout...unless some country's leader gives it to them.

It could also make a heck of an election issue seeing as how older people vote in large numbers and the UN's plans will materialize by the end of this year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-30-2015, 05:27 AM
 
Location: Aztlan
2,686 posts, read 1,769,919 times
Reputation: 1282
Obamacare death panels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2015, 05:36 AM
 
79,914 posts, read 44,174,531 times
Reputation: 17209
Denying health care to the elderly isn't going to stop the young from killing each other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2015, 05:42 AM
 
Location: Aztlan
2,686 posts, read 1,769,919 times
Reputation: 1282
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Denying health care to the elderly isn't going to stop the young from killing each other.
Especially in Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2015, 06:24 AM
 
2,499 posts, read 2,625,726 times
Reputation: 1789
So who should have priority for an organ transplant a ninety five year old or a twenty year old?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2015, 06:41 AM
 
4,983 posts, read 3,289,597 times
Reputation: 2739
Yeah the old can just die off.......except in a few decades when society can see the value of life and keep their old alive. Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2015, 06:53 AM
 
2,499 posts, read 2,625,726 times
Reputation: 1789
If there are limited resources who, what or how should decisions be made on how those resources are allocated?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2015, 06:54 AM
 
79,914 posts, read 44,174,531 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom1944 View Post
So who should have priority for an organ transplant a ninety five year old or a twenty year old?
20 year olds aren't dying with any regularity because 95 year olds are taking all the organs. They are dying regularly because they become an organ donor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2015, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Aztlan
2,686 posts, read 1,769,919 times
Reputation: 1282
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom1944 View Post
If there are limited resources who, what or how should decisions be made on how those resources are allocated?
Adam Smith's "invisible hand".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2015, 07:40 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,514,587 times
Reputation: 10096
Looks like Sarah Palin was right after all.

Bow the knee, lefties. Sarah Palin owns you people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top