Obamacare and the GOP, will it be gone after this week? Supreme court will rule. (Harry Reid, Congressmen)

[pknopp]

As I note.....all that will happen is what happened when Obamacare kicked in. Their policies were cancelled and they had to sign up for new ones.

There are very few that didn't have insurance pre-Obamacare or during Obamacare that won't have it post Obamacare.

[turkey-head]

Originally Posted by pknopp

As I note.....all that will happen is what happened when Obamacare kicked in. Their policies were cancelled and they had to sign up for new ones.

There are very few that didn't have insurance pre-Obamacare or during Obamacare that won't have it post Obamacare.

I'm sure that's what they tell you on FoxNews.

But if you're interested in credible sources like the Department of Health and Human Services, that number is in excess of 10 MILLION:

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsr1406753






Stay informed, my friend

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by turkey-head

I'm sure that's what they tell you on FoxNews.

I didn't read beyond this. I'm probably (outside of irresponsible spending) further left than you on many issues. I support Universal Health care.

[turkey-head]

Check out the percentage of uninsured. It's a neat graph!





See how it's LOWER now than before Obamacare. That there means it's working, kids!

[turkey-head]

Originally Posted by pknopp

I didn't read beyond this. I'm probably (outside of irresponsible spending) further left than you on many issues. I support Universal Health care.

If you're not interested in the simple and readily available truth, that's your business.

But Google is there when you need it.

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by turkey-head

Check out the percentage of uninsured. It's a neat graph!





See how it's LOWER now than before Obamacare. That there means it's working, kids!

Please pay special attention to page 3.....

https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fi...-ACAtables.pdf



Especially the number that have (-) next to it...

Also your graph starts in 2012, when was the ACA implemented...you are just being dishonest....why?

[turkey-head]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

Please pay special attention to page 3.....

https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fi...-ACAtables.pdf



Especially the number that have (-) next to it...

Also your graph starts in 2012, when was the ACA implemented...you are just being dishonest....why?

Yes, it starts before the ACA was implemented to give you a nice year+ baseline. The implementation of two stages of the ACA is clearly marked and shows an obvious drop in the percentage of uninsured.

Not sure what there is to misunderstand here?

As for your own link, it contradicts nothing in the graph.

[greywar]

Originally Posted by turkey-head

Yes, it starts before the ACA was implemented to give you a nice year+ baseline. The implementation of two stages of the ACA is clearly marked and shows an obvious drop in the percentage of uninsured.

Not sure what there is to misunderstand here?

As for your own link, it contradicts nothing in the graph.

Actually....its not the best graph, the latest numbers show that the number of uninsured has fallen even further.

Currently its 12.9%

In U.S., Uninsured Rate Sinks to 12.9%

[pknopp]

Originally Posted by turkey-head

If you're not interested in the simple and readily available truth, that's your business.

But Google is there when you need it.

Fox News has nothing to do with that.

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by turkey-head

Yes, it starts before the ACA was implemented to give you a nice year+ baseline. The implementation of two stages of the ACA is clearly marked and shows an obvious drop in the percentage of uninsured.

Not sure what there is to misunderstand here?

As for your own link, it contradicts nothing in the graph.

The ACA was implemented in 2012?

My link contradicts everything in your graph....