Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-02-2015, 03:42 PM
 
1,140 posts, read 1,404,637 times
Reputation: 321

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by O.C. Ogilvy View Post
Mexico attacked the U.S. first, but that was likely to happen due to both sides amassing armed combatants on the disputed border.
Oops, I was unaware of that, but now I have a new question: why did Texas end up as a Southern state (yes it's in the geographical south, but I'm talking about culture when I say "Southern") but California ended up very Northern? Under Spanish then Mexican rule, weren't the two pretty much the same? I also am surprised at how much Louisiana became a Southern state even though it was purchased from France, and how "Southernized" Oklahoma became even though it was for many years a protected Indian territory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-02-2015, 03:52 PM
 
Location: Inyokern, CA
1,609 posts, read 1,078,767 times
Reputation: 549
Quote:
Originally Posted by antredd View Post
Part of the reason that black leaders wanted black americans to be called African American is because black people are technically the only group who didn't have an identity with a continent. For example, if you are white, you are from Britain, Germany, Spain, or France, you are still labelled European. If you are from China, Japan, or Korea, you are labelled Asian. So I think that's was the gist of saying that black people who's descendants are from Africa could be labelled African American.

To me, I am black, who happens to be American. Now get this. Why do we associate people born in the United States as only American. Aren't Canadians on the same North American Continent American, as well as Mexicans who live in Mexico American as well? Hummmmmmm?
Because this country is The United States of America!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 04:03 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,179,016 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by caribdoll View Post
All the government has to do is provide an African/African descent category. Then list:

Black American
Afro-Caribbean
Afro-Latino
African
Other African descent

They have enough categories for Asians and Hispanics. It can be done for people of African origin as well.
Why do the others get the Afro prefix except for us black Americans?

LOL...no way. We have just as much right to that prefix too. I don't want to disown my ancestry by any means, and that ancestry is African.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 04:06 PM
 
Location: Maryland about 20 miles NW of DC
6,104 posts, read 5,987,639 times
Reputation: 2479
Quote:
Originally Posted by motownewave View Post
Name should be used for the race of African and Afro-Caribbean immigrants to the USA?

Ironically, recent immigrants from Liberia in a way have a right to identify as "African American" (INSTEAD of "Liberian American") because the nation of Liberia was created by former slaves who fled the USA for their homeland in the Old World. But I wonder... did the original African American settlers of Liberia intermarry with people from other African countries, people who had lived in Africa since time immemorial?

And what right to the term "African American" do Cuban Americans of African origin have? Or Puerto Ricans of African origin either on the island or in the 50 states?
What would you call someone like Elon Musk who is a native born South African a decendant of the Dutch people who first set foot there in the 17th Century at about the same time Britons Dutch, Germans and French were doing the same in North America. He now is a naturalized American citizen does that make him an Afro-American. Now what do you do with people from Egypt, Sudan Libya, Tunesia , Algeria or Morocco? Many of these people have as much Caucasian blood as any other European and live in a continent called Africa There are also several millions whites who threw their lot at Independence with the African nations that replaced the French, Portugese and British Empires and are native born Ghanans, Nigerians, Ivorians, Senegalese, Kenyans (i.e. Richard B. Leakey Jr.) , Tanzanians (i.e Jane Goodall) or Angolans! If they came here would they be Afro-Americans?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Aztlan
2,686 posts, read 1,769,609 times
Reputation: 1282
Quote:
Originally Posted by motownewave View Post
Oops, I was unaware of that, but now I have a new question: why did Texas end up as a Southern state (yes it's in the geographical south, but I'm talking about culture when I say "Southern") but California ended up very Northern? Under Spanish then Mexican rule, weren't the two pretty much the same.
That would be a very long and complicated answer which I will not attempt to figure out now(though it sounds like an excellent thesis topic!). The short and dirty(and not necessarily definitive) reason probably has to do with how the two states came into the Union in light of the antebellum sectional conflict. Texas was admitted as a slave state in 1845. Mexico saw this an illegal land grab and also was opposed to slavery. The annexation clearly precipitated armed conflict between Mexico and the U.S. Meanwhile, a handful of Californians were busy attacking the Mexican governor's house in Sonoma and raising up the Bear Flag, while John Fremont was conveniently in the area on a mission from President Polk to take advantage of any destabilization. The revolt in California quickly became engulfed by the wider war with Mexico and California was ultimately ceded to the U.S. It was admitted as a free state under the terms of the Compromise of 1850 which also allowed for the Fugitive Slave Act to be law. I suppose that if California had come into the Union as a slave state, it too may have joined the Confederacy, and there were pro-confederacy voices in California during the War of Northern Aggression.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Elysium
12,383 posts, read 8,136,596 times
Reputation: 9194
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Why do the others get the Afro prefix except for us black Americans?
LOL...no way. We have just as much right to that prefix too. I don't want to disown my ancestry by any means, and that ancestry is African.
In the early 70s Afro American was being used interchangeably with black. In an era of domestic terrorists the SLA being the most famous example, the Black Panthers and Malcolm X still being relevant I think black won over Afro because America was not mentioned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 04:18 PM
 
15,064 posts, read 6,167,490 times
Reputation: 5124
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Why do the others get the Afro prefix except for us black Americans?

LOL...no way. We have just as much right to that prefix too. I don't want to disown my ancestry by any means, and that ancestry is African.
That was what the person to whom I responded preferred. So that is what I used in response. Not in disagreement with you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 04:29 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,179,016 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post
In the early 70s Afro American was being used interchangeably with black. In an era of domestic terrorists the SLA being the most famous example, the Black Panthers and Malcolm X still being relevant I think black won over Afro because America was not mentioned.
Black is still acceptable. It's certainly more practical in everyday speech.
Quote:
Originally Posted by caribdoll View Post
That was what the person to whom I responded preferred. So that is what I used in response. Not in disagreement with you.
LMAO...ok. Just needling you a bit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 04:30 PM
 
Location: Maryland about 20 miles NW of DC
6,104 posts, read 5,987,639 times
Reputation: 2479
Quote:
Originally Posted by motownewave View Post
Oops, I was unaware of that, but now I have a new question: why did Texas end up as a Southern state (yes it's in the geographical south, but I'm talking about culture when I say "Southern") but California ended up very Northern? Under Spanish then Mexican rule, weren't the two pretty much the same? I also am surprised at how much Louisiana became a Southern state even though it was purchased from France, and how "Southernized" Oklahoma became even though it was for many years a protected Indian territory.
Tejas was largely settled by Americans coming from the South and people who decided they didn't want to live in a Mexican province. They rebelled and took a chunk of Mexico away from Mexico and then gave it to the USA. In 1860 over the protests of Sam Houston Texans chose to leave the Union and throw their lot with the Confederacy. Texas entered the Union in the 1830s as a Slave State. Texas is part of the South because Texans made that choice.

Texas is large enough to have more than one culture. In a book published in the 1970s called the Nine Nations of North America Texas was split into three nations East Texas (Houston) was part of Dixie, North and West Texas (Panhandle, Austin Dallas-For Worth, Midland -Odessa) The Breadbasket and The Rio Grande Valley, San Antonio and El Paso Mex-America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-02-2015, 04:39 PM
 
801 posts, read 1,103,352 times
Reputation: 832
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigskydude View Post
Every Black friend I have hates being called African American -- They all would rather be called Black.

I also have several Native American friends that hate being called Native American. They would much rather be called Lakota, Souix, and so on and so forth.
So your friends can call themselves anything they want to call themselves. This is supposed to be a free country where they are supposed to have that right.

Problem is, as usual, white people want to have control over what people identify as or call themselves. So as long as your friends are not giving way to the tyrannical bullying and control of white people, then they are fine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top