Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wrong. There's ALWAYS going to be a bunch of crazies that will find a government tyrannical. Read the constitution and when you find something along the lines you suggest, post it here.
What do you mean wrong? Didn't you just agreed with the premise. There are some people who hate government officials that those officials need to be protected.
find something along the lines? How do you not know we overthrew British tyranny?
You're post doesn't make sense. it's like you were trying to come up with something clever and failed.
Would the sign they post simply have to match those posted in front of public office buildings like State Capitol and Courts? What might be the reason these buildings outlaw guns to public?
I can see you've not been to the TX State Capital in the last 20 years.
They have an express line through Security for people with a Concealed Permit. I just have to show them my handgun license and I don't even go through metal detectors.
So your right to "own" a gun supersedes the right of private property owners to ban guns on their property?
It does not. You are trespassing and violating the law.
You have a right to carry a gun. Unfortunately. They conversely have a right to ban guns from their property.
You just don't get it. Such signs and policies matter not when I go about my daily business.
Carrying concealed is just that. Noone knows who is carrying and that's why it works.
300,000 people walk about here in Virginia every day armed without incident. Get used to it.
You just don't get it. Such signs and policies matter not when I go about my daily business.
Carrying concealed is just that. Noone knows who is carrying and that's why it works.
300,000 people walk about here in Virginia every day armed without incident. Get used to it.
Over 11 million in the country. People are in close proximity to firearms often and have no idea.
I can see you've not been to the TX State Capital in the last 20 years.
They have an express line through Security for people with a Concealed Permit. I just have to show them my handgun license and I don't even go through metal detectors.
Did you say permit/physical search to exercise what you believe to be your right? Why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry
What do you mean wrong? Didn't you just agreed with the premise. There are some people who hate government officials that those officials need to be protected.
find something along the lines? How do you not know we overthrew British tyranny?
You're post doesn't make sense. it's like you were trying to come up with something clever and failed.
I asked you to read the Constitution and come back with your findings (from it). Let me see where you get the ideas from.
As I said, multiple times in my posts which you ignore. It's about the ability to defend oneself. Keep ignoring that fact and don't address it.
It is also the theme of this thread. Get it yet? Ignore that too.
LOL..... you still don't get it?
You argued that arming pilots would have stopped 9-11. One can not prove anything 100% either way but the terrorists planned this for years and would have taken that into consideration and done things differently. It wouldn't have stopped them.
If that isn't your argument, why even mention 9-11?
You argued that arming pilots would have stopped 9-11. One can not prove anything 100% either way but the terrorists planned this for years and would have taken that into consideration and done things differently. It wouldn't have stopped them.
If that isn't your argument, why even mention 9-11?
Would have stopped the take over of the plane because the pilots would be able to defend themselves. it's about self defense.
Agreed they would have tried a different method since one doesn't bring a knife to a gun fight.
Would have stopped the take over of the plane because the pilots would be able to defend themselves. it's about self defense.
Agreed they would have tried a different method since one doesn't bring a knife to a gun fight.
I'm sure the plane is already taken over by the time they reach the cockpit. So pilots with guns would have no affect.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There are some people who hate government officials that those officials need to be protected. 
