Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
According to the CBO, when asked by Rep. John Boehner how much repealing Obama would save the government, they replied "[url="https://www.cbo.gov/publication/43471"]enacting that legislation would cause a net increase in federal budget deficits of $109 billion over the 2013–2022
Not repealing it is going to cost us $1.5 TRILLION..
I didnt even continue, if you dont know that $1.5 T is > $109 billion by now, I dont know why bother continuing.
There is nothing ambiguous about the words state, and federal.. Well to most of us that arent complete idiots..
The clause in question was ambiguous, which nearly every member of the SCOTUS agreed with, even those who dissented. From there, it was only a matter of whether to apply a strict reading to the clause, or to take a wider approach and consider legislative intent and frankly, a little common sense.
The clause in question was ambiguous, which nearly every member of the SCOTUS agreed with, even those who dissented. From there, it was only a matter of whether to apply a strict reading to the clause, or to take a wider approach and consider legislative intent and frankly, a little common sense.
So the Supreme Court called the Democratic Congress stupid...
No, it isn't. The ACA law itself even defines the term "State" as "each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia." No ambiguity there, whatsoever.
No, it isn't. The ACA law itself even defines the term "State" as "each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia." No ambiguity there, whatsoever.
There is nothing ambiguous about the words state, and federal.. Well to most of us that arent complete idiots..
It's not nice to call Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy "complete idiots". Along with the other four Justices in the majority, I have it on pretty good authority that they are extremely bright. Maybe they aren't "complete idiots".
Though, I must say, those Justices clearly are not as bright as Limbaugh, Hannity, Carlson, Beck, so on. Aren't they all college dropouts. Oh yeah.
Mick
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
