Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:38 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,312,803 times
Reputation: 7623

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
Didn't the bible say that man has free will and at anytime can repent and will be forgiven. Jesus forgave Judas even after he sold JC out which led to his death.
Yes, that is true. But it doesn't mean it's okay to sin or approve of sin.

This is also true...

http://i59.tinypic.com/4ik9xy.jpg

Last edited by Ibginnie; 06-27-2015 at 10:29 AM.. Reason: copyright violation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:42 PM
 
Location: McKinleyville, California
6,414 posts, read 10,492,645 times
Reputation: 4305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurn350 View Post
^^ Regarding the above statement, I think God would beg to differ.

It's not a good day for those who actually still have a moral compass.
Is it moral to discriminate? Is it moral to dehumanize a group of people? It does not take a belief in a god to have morality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:48 PM
 
Location: McKinleyville, California
6,414 posts, read 10,492,645 times
Reputation: 4305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
Here's one for ambient: Why does it hurt you to stop making blanket statements?

Not all Conservatives are against gay marriage. The only thing I'm against is making this a federal issue. The Federal government does not belong in your bedroom, but you all just gave the Federal government that power. Why the hell would you do such a thing?

It should have been a state decision. It should have been up to each individual state. Why people in this country want the Federal government all up in their homes I will never understand.
Who do you think ended interracial marriage bans? It was not the states in the end, it was the supreme court. Rights are not up to a vote by the majority, never should be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:54 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,296,863 times
Reputation: 2314
conservatives blew it. In order to win the 2004 Presidential election, they pumped up the fear of terrorism and the anti-gay marriage rhetoric.

I remember when homosexuals just wanted civil unions, and conservatives said not only wont you get civil unions we are gonna pass a defense of marriage act to rub it your faces.

To be clear the defense of marriage bill passed during Bill Clinton's presidency not in 2004.

Homosexuals were able to use our society to slowly turn those opinions around. The election of President Obama and his getting Congress to end don't ask don't tell, was a harbinger of that change.


Maybe just maybe if conservatives would have relented on civil unions back then and not passed the defense of marriage bill, we wouldn't be here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:54 PM
 
Location: A Nation Possessed
25,732 posts, read 18,809,520 times
Reputation: 22579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Three Wolves In Snow View Post
Why people in this country want the Federal government all up in their homes I will never understand.
Well, I would extend that question to state governments as well. No government should be in our homes or bedrooms. Unfortunately, those days are long gone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:56 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,809 posts, read 24,321,239 times
Reputation: 32940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Make no mistake, this ruling will not be respected. There is an authority that is over the Supreme Court and the US government, which is God, and this is not within the authority of the Supreme Court or our government to redefine.

There is no such thing as homosexual marriage. There never has been and never will be.

Civil disobedience to this ruling is certainly required from everyone who worships God more than the corrupt humanism that has clearly overtaken our government on this issue. And I expect we will see that.
The decision does not mean that any church or minister has to marry gay people.
It means that civil marriages must be respected from a legal standpoint.

The vast majority of Christians I know support the Supreme Court decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 10:59 PM
 
Location: The Lone Star State
8,030 posts, read 9,052,833 times
Reputation: 5050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobdreamz View Post
Has the Earth burned to a crisp yet?
Nope, though AlGore and comrades insisted it would be shortly...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 11:02 PM
 
Location: McKinleyville, California
6,414 posts, read 10,492,645 times
Reputation: 4305
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
a business CAN discriminate if they are asked to do something that goes against their religious beliefs. for instance, if a gay couple wants to buy a bunch cupcakes for a party, thats fine. but if that same gay couple wants to buy a wedding cake for a gay wedding, and the owner of the business is against gay marriage on religious grounds, then that owner should not be forced to provide the couple in question a wedding cake.

the owner should also not have to have the militant gay lobby threaten them with bodily harm, property damage, or even death. like all businesses, if you dont like the fact that a particular bakery doesnt supply gay weddings, then dont frequent that business, go some where else.

remember that one persons rights END where the rights of another begin. you may have the right to get married to your same sex partner, but i have the right to refuse to service that wedding.

and dont forget that state laws allow business the right to refuse service to anyone.
Why should any one of any religion have the right to use that to trump business law that everyone else must follow without getting exemptions. Sorry, that does not gel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 11:02 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartacus713 View Post
Make no mistake, this ruling will not be respected. There is an authority that is over the Supreme Court and the US government, which is God, and this is not within the authority of the Supreme Court or our government to redefine.

There is no such thing as homosexual marriage. There never has been and never will be.

Civil disobedience to this ruling is certainly required from everyone who worships God more than the corrupt humanism that has clearly overtaken our government on this issue. And I expect we will see that.
Any decision that comes out of such institutions as the USSC is ALWAYS going to have two sides, one that celebrates, the other that is bitter. It is natural. You happen to be on the wrong side on this one, but I'm sure there are other cases you celebrate. No?

This is about extending public benefits that government has engaged in providing to the people. It is logical, and the right thing to do. Religious pandering by governments is a violation of the US Constitution (although, even USSC justices can be guilty of that... they are human).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2015, 11:04 PM
 
Location: The Lone Star State
8,030 posts, read 9,052,833 times
Reputation: 5050
Quote:
Originally Posted by sxrckr View Post
Roberts is going to be very scrutinized over this in comparison to the Obamacare decisions. He dissented today. Very curious. Read his remarks and it sounds like two different people.
I've disagreed with him all three times.
Quote:
Originally Posted by biscuitmom View Post
So what? It's a lifetime appointment, he doesn't worry about the scrutiny.
If he cares about his name and history books, he would. As they say, "wrong side of history." First when that boondoggle Obamacare, which he twisted and contorted to uphold, eventually implodes being that it's basically unsustainable... and then with dissenting on today's decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top