Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Does not matter at all where it came from or who funded it if it is true. And, we all know that Bush is indeed a LIAR!!!!
Were all those Democrats also lying when they were saying the same things as Bush? ("Iraq will seek nuclear weapons, Iraq has WMD and will use them," etc, etc).
MOD CUT
Last edited by NewToCA; 01-23-2008 at 02:23 PM..
Reason: don't bend this back toward Bill Clinton and his problems, it isn't the topic
Were all those Democrats also lying when they were saying the same things as Bush? ("Iraq will seek nuclear weapons, Iraq has WMD and will use them," etc, etc).
MOD CUT
YES, they are also liars. After all, they are politicians aren't they? But lying about a sexual escapade, which of course he was wrong to do, is not the same as lying to get us involved in a war for money and oil and such. But hey, you people who want to blame anything and everything on Clinton, be my guest, because it shows you have nothing of substance to debate the liar in chief we have now. BTW, I never liked Clinton either. I am not a Demopublican or a Republicrat and don't think much of anyone who post nothing but part poklitics and shows no independent thought.
YES, they are also liars. After all, they are politicians aren't they? But lying about a sexual escapade, which of course he was wrong to do, is not the same as lying to get us involved in a war for money and oil and such. But hey, you people who want to blame anything and everything on Clinton, be my guest, because it shows you have nothing of substance to debate the liar in chief we have now. BTW, I never liked Clinton either. I am not a Demopublican or a Republicrat and don't think much of anyone who post nothing but part poklitics and shows no independent thought.
I would reply with facts about Clinton, but I would get another mod cut, so forget it.
O'Reilly was talking about this ridiculous "article" this morning. I'll post about it when a listen to it again. It was from CBS news, who got it from Associated Press (AP) who got it from an organization funded by the leftist George Soros!
If it's true, who cares who funds it? Lies are lies. No matter who tells them. No matter who catalogs them.
Soros is doing us a favor by helping point out the garbage handed us by a crooked, kleptocratic administration. Don't expect James Dobson or Family Research Council or the NRA to point this out, they're cronies of Bush/Rove.
Then just list 20. If there are so many, listing 20 should be easy.
But make sure they are actual lies with sources, not something Bush said going by the information he received. That is not lying.
If it's true, who cares who funds it? Lies are lies. No matter who tells them. No matter who catalogs them.
Soros is doing us a favor by helping point out the garbage handed us by a crooked, kleptocratic administration. Don't expect James Dobson or Family Research Council or the NRA to point this out, they're cronies of Bush/Rove.
If it's true, it's true. Period.
The reason it matters who funds it is because what is certainly not a lie can be taken out of context, twisted, and/or distorted to seem as if its a lie. I read the article and this is exactly what was done. For example Bush never said that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. As a matter of fact Cheney said on Face the Nation that he didn't know if there was an association between Al Qaeda and Saddam. Those who are still upset over the 2000 election, like Soros, want to continue to spread the lie that they di this to lie us into going to war.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But lying about a sexual escapade, which of course he was wrong to do, is not the same as lying to get us involved in a war for money and oil and such. But hey, you people who want to blame anything and everything on Clinton, be my guest, because it shows you have nothing of substance to debate the liar in chief we have now. BTW, I never liked Clinton either. I am not a Demopublican or a Republicrat and don't think much of anyone who post nothing but part poklitics and shows no independent thought.
