Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Do you believe Obama was right for saying this and doing this, and if so why?
Yes 18 24.66%
No 53 72.60%
I don't know 2 2.74%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-17-2015, 07:08 PM
 
7,578 posts, read 5,325,444 times
Reputation: 9447

Advertisements

That's one of the silliest juxtapositions that I've seen in the last 10 minutes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-17-2015, 07:22 PM
 
580 posts, read 449,883 times
Reputation: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
This is an utterly fallacious argument.

It was NEVER the argument of the right that America sign a status of forces agreement that left Americans at the whim of Iraqi courts. That is a lie. you need to apologize. period.
More disgusting right-wing revisionist history. Guess what? The SOFA signed by your darling Bush in 2008 DID leave American contractors, and to a limited extent, U.S. forces under the authority of the Iraqi courts. Show me ONE post where ANY right-wing shill disagreed with that provision...just one.
Quote:
There was an still is an argument that mr Obama is an utterly failed negotiator who in the end wanted out of Iraq so bad that he negotiated poorly then used the excuse that the agreement was all wrong.

NOW we are saying.... Obama sucks at negotiations.
That provision was a line in the sand for the Iraqi gov't. Absent Iraq budging, what was Obama to do? Well, I guess he could have signed anyway, but unlike Bush, Obama was NOT willing to to hang our people out to dry. Knowing that, show me ONE post of ANY righty that agreed that Obama could not sign that agreement with that provision in place. Just one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2015, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,270 posts, read 26,199,434 times
Reputation: 15639
One of the most historic agreements between 6 nations to prevent Iran from getting nuclear arms for the next 10 years and the response is the "4 detainees were not released".

The hatred for this president and the total disregard for what's best for our country is stunning
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2015, 10:36 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,573 posts, read 17,281,298 times
Reputation: 37315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
One of the most historic agreements between 6 nations to prevent Iran from getting nuclear arms for the next 10 years and the response is the "4 detainees were not released".

The hatred for this president and the total disregard for what's best for our country is stunning
Meh, quit your sniffing. The Looney Left wasted no time in expressing their hatred of GW Bush.

The president brought it on himself.

Most people would not have thought of the hostages if Garrett had not been doing his job. So, good for you, Major! Now, ask him about his grades! Or, all about all those Red Lines. Or, ask him to tell us again about all the money we're going to be saving on health care.
Ask him how much the budget deficit is!
Or ask him when his new transparent government is going to start!

You go, Major!

Last edited by Listener2307; 07-17-2015 at 10:47 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2015, 11:01 PM
 
Location: NW Nevada
18,158 posts, read 15,626,323 times
Reputation: 17149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox Terrier View Post
That's the point; he didn't ask that. He implied that Obama was content. That's asking a very personal and insulting question. That's asking about the President's emotions.

FORMER Marine. He was not active duty Marine. He committed a crime in Mexico. When citizens of other countries commit crimes here, they are given a trial. We don't just release them to their home country. Should that be different for other countries? We are special, or something?
Heya, be committed a crime in Mexico. His biggest, not having enough Yanqi denero, to vet the Mexican cops to just game his gun and let him go. Like they just don't even pay the slightest attention to squads of heavily armed cartel goons. Because the goons boss owns their boss, bjf, hey, tossing a gringo in a Mexican $h17hole is not only cool, but great fun, and the ranker gegs a new GH , AND whatever cash the gringo has, AND a car. Spare me any defense of the Mexicans in that incident.

No better, maybe worse, than the Iranians. Whilst I'm thinking the Americans held in Iran , lime those "hiker" kids, did pug themselves, rather willfully, in harms way, the question still had merit. If some leftist MSNBC hack bad asked the same question, of a Republican prez, leftys would be all yammering for an answer. So, maybe, leftys have their own share of "schills" and "hacks".?

Fact is , this deal is Obamas baby. Even many Dems in congress are not in agreement with it. Enough to force a veto and possible over ride. Only the most extreme sycophants are all the way behind Obama on it. Its a dangerous dance, and its leaving a mess for the next prez and congress to deal with. One we won't be hearing about for the next 8 years, pointing the finger back at him. Not without the shrillest of yowling from Obama worshipers.

Honestly, the way the far left just swoons on everything Obama does is..disturbing. And, bear in mind ttbe last mid term election results. What are the swooners and crooners going to do if the 2016 general goes the other way? And the left loses its executive, pen power, legislation? I'm saving a special box of popcorn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2015, 01:06 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,435,569 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hadoken View Post
...Garret did not ask that. Instead, he asked that Obama explain why he was "content" with them being in prison. That is not a question about the prisoners, or the negotiations around them, it's a question about the president's feelings. And the president called him out on his rude question, and then addresses what was actually important.
Obama IS content with Americans rotting in Iranian torture dungeons.

That is obvious.

So pointing it out is perfectly legitimate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
I do not like Obama one bit but we really do not know what the negotiations were about behind closed doors on the US side or when or delegates met with the Iranians.
Those alleged "closed door" negotiations have been going on for years, and we have nothing to show for them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
That's called Extra-Territoriality, and is obviously a concept with which you're not familiar.
It's irrelevant.

The U.S. was in a position to occupy Iraq on its own terms, not Iraq's terms.

Obama could have said we are staying, and you're not going to have jurisdiction over our troops and contractors whether you like it or not.

What were the Iranians going to do if they didn't like it?

Invade California?

Quote:
Originally Posted by thriftylefty View Post
...Garret was out of line for assuming any participant came back from a deal of this magnitude "contented."
In other words, Obama negotiated a bad deal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox Terrier View Post
That's the point; he didn't ask that. He implied that Obama was content.
Obama IS content.

More than that, he is taking his usual victory lap for committing yet another act of treason.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cjski View Post
More disgusting right-wing revisionist history. Guess what? The SOFA signed by your darling Bush in 2008 DID leave American contractors, and to a limited extent, U.S. forces under the authority of the Iraqi courts. Show me ONE post where ANY right-wing shill disagreed with that provision...just one.
Why should we?

It is obvious that not one real conservative would have approved of that nonsense.

Bush represented the mainstream Republican Party, not the many conservatives here who disapproved of his policies (including immigration and overspending).

Quote:
Absent Iraq budging, what was Obama to do?
Tell Iraq that coalition soldiers and contractors would not be subject to Iraqi jurisdiction, whether Iraq liked it or not. The same thing Bush should have said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NVplumber View Post
...If some leftist MSNBC hack bad asked the same question, of a Republican prez, leftys would be all yammering for an answer. So, maybe, leftys have their own share of "schills" and "hacks".?
Of course they do.

A much larger share.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2015, 09:15 AM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,573 posts, read 17,281,298 times
Reputation: 37315
Yeah. Obama is content. He said he was.
Pleased, even.
Why else would he sign?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2015, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Inland Empire, Calif
2,884 posts, read 5,641,002 times
Reputation: 2803
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
Yes, but there's a silver lining. I invited a few of my non-aligned voter friends to peruse this and a few other similar threads, and they walked away saying they'd never vote for a Republican again. It's working well.
YourBS meter is pegged, but if it makes you feel better, continue on
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2015, 10:45 AM
 
755 posts, read 675,430 times
Reputation: 1253
Quote:
Originally Posted by california-jewel View Post
I know right. Don't ever ask OBAMA a legitimate question. Because you will not get a logical answer. Don't ever ask the jerk a negative question, in relation to himself or administration. Because we have seek the bully in action have we not.

A very straight forward question, which Obummer cannot handle.

He handled it and he handled it real good. He put that buffoon in his place

Loved it. "I am ashamed of you." Lol!!


Nice try.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2015, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
If you offer straw man arguments as a part of your question, you can expect them to be thrown back in your face, and that is exactly what happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top