Who would be more in the wrong here?

[TheDusty]

Originally Posted by Haakon

Why didn't a liberal in one of those first 10 houses give her what she needed before she had to steal in the first place? Since it's a hypothetical situation we can assume that hypothetically a liberal might give some of their own money to help a child - but apparently not even in fantasy.

This is the most childish deflection I've ever seen. Not only did you just make up a part of this scenario, you then went on to assume that made up part of the already made up part is 100% applicable to real life.

[Bulldogdad]

Originally Posted by greywar

Pretty sure the 10 year olds going to sell the bag for food an water. OP indicated this.

Basically its a thought experiment that puts up where we are headed, against what folks believe. Kind of a fun question.

The man is a murderer, the childs a criminal, and the world described is a nightmare.

I got a better answer: it was a good dime bag to come with that senario.

Hope there's some Cheetos left in the house.