Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-23-2015, 12:43 PM
 
20,457 posts, read 12,373,731 times
Reputation: 10250

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WIHS2006 View Post
Mia Love was propped up by the Tea Party to make them look inclusive instead of a bunch of bigoted know-nothing fools.

The sooner my party (GOP) is rid of the Tea Party the sooner we can go back to having a Congress that works and debates and governs for all of the United States. If we're lucky maybe they will even take The Donald along with them on their way out the door. We will get more women and minorities through moderation and centrist policies than we will by showing off people like Love, West, Cruz, Carson, etc who alienate large portions of their ethnic/racial groups with extremist beliefs.

hahahah!

so the republican party will get more inclusive by kicking minorities out of the party!


that right there is RICH!!


hahaha...at not with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-23-2015, 12:46 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
Sometimes congressional backbenchers become President. You know, like Obama did.
The House and the Senate are 2 different animals when it comes what a "backbencher" is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2015, 12:46 PM
 
698 posts, read 587,290 times
Reputation: 1899
Mia Love's pornstar name is - Mia Love.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2015, 01:01 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
your point is a non point.

clearly democrats consistently do this. if some leftist were to post that here it would be no different from a fish posting they like water.


now someone who is not a liberal (I assume a republican) has decided to use your argument. and now you are saying its wrong to say its wrong when those who are saying are saying its right???? that's nuts .
My point is relevent to the discussion seeing as the OP and many other republicans have made the argument that doing so is wrong and are there for hypocrites.

As for ,"the argument" itslef. I have stated multiple times that the color of a candidate does not matter to me, it is who best represents me ideals.

so in short, I have always called it wrong where as yourside only thinks its wrong when the left side of the aisle does it.

Quote:
Now lets try to talk about what is real.

1. Democrats say that force by government should be used to create space for democrats to be elected based on their race because its for the "greater good" for minority (I assume liberal) voices to be heard.
Democrats and Republicans have made that claim(as my link shows), but it isnt for Democrats to be elected, it is for the electorate in that area to elect who best represents them regardless of party or race of the candidate.

but that is off subject, remember my post was about the OP supporting a candidate because of the color of her skin, while also saying that its wrong for Democrats to.

That is hypocritical.

Quote:
2. Republicans say that it is a good and necessary thing for there to be minority Republican voices elected.
The difference is (and im typing slowly so all the progressives can follow) is that Republicans are NOT arguing for the force to be used by government to create districts for minority republicans.
1. this isnt instant messaging, no one can tell how slow you are typing.

2. The "difference" you speak of is a non point(to use your phrase) as there are no areas where minorities lean republican, there for no district to create.

Quote:
In fact, the Republican argument is that Republicans are better by being supportive of minority conservatives.
Im sure you meant something different there than you typed, but of course your party is better at supporting conservatives of all colors seeing as the Democratic party nationally is to the left and so are a majority of constituents.

Quote:
I still bet the difference is lost on most members of the left.
You are arguing principle over ability even though ability isnt really an option, so we dont know what would happen if there was a majority minority republican district.


Quote:
you have compared dead fish and ice cream and called the ice cream a hypocrite.
I have no idea what you are trying to say here, but the hypocrite in this situation is the republican posting as he has said supporting a candidate because of the color of their skin is wrong as have many more.

Arguing that Democrats do it to is the definition of being a hypocrite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2015, 01:07 PM
 
20,457 posts, read 12,373,731 times
Reputation: 10250
Thank you dsjj for proving my point.

you don't get it. its probably not possible.

Republicans reject government interjection. THAT has always been the issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2015, 01:20 PM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,111,606 times
Reputation: 8011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
Sometimes congressional backbenchers become President. You know, like Obama did.
Yup, when opposed by Republicans, the backbencher can pull two landslides. Sad.

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2015, 01:38 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6031
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
Thank you dsjj for proving my point.

you don't get it. its probably not possible.

Republicans reject government interjection. THAT has always been the issue.
This isnt about government injection.

The OP is against Democrats voting for and supporting someone just because of the color of their skin, the OP then did a 180 and now supports someone because of the color of her skin.

Its you who doesnt get it.

you are trying to dodge that discussion and start one about a subject that I already told you I dont agree with.

And again, Republicans support packing black people into districts as well, as my link shows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2015, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,879,874 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
Wow.. in 2014 Mia's money came overwhelmingly from out-of-state. Only 1,000 of her 19,000 contributors were from Utah.

"Republican congressional candidate Mia Love's hefty $1.5 million fundraising haul in the past three months includes contributions from more than 19,000 individual donors — including nearly 18,000 from outside Utah.

Mia Love raises $1.5 million in past three months for congressional campaign | Deseret News
Nearly everyone that voted for her was a citizen of Utah.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2015, 01:52 PM
 
20,457 posts, read 12,373,731 times
Reputation: 10250
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
This isnt about government injection.

The OP is against Democrats voting for and supporting someone just because of the color of their skin, the OP then did a 180 and now supports someone because of the color of her skin.

Its you who doesnt get it.

you are trying to dodge that discussion and start one about a subject that I already told you I dont agree with.

And again, Republicans support packing black people into districts as well, as my link shows.
the heck it isn't.

what democrats say is substantively different from what republicans say.

Republicans may say that its good to have minority voices in the party. That is not the same thing democrats say that republicans take issue with. I know you are s m r t enough to know that.

Democrats say government needs to force the creation.


THAT is NOT the republican view. nor is it the position of the OP.

Republicans want minorities to compete and win.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-23-2015, 02:00 PM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,949,402 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
Yup, when opposed by Republicans, the backbencher can pull two landslides. Sad.

Mick
Tells you about the stupidity of the American voter, doesn't it. Gruber was right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top