Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because none of those laws proposed would have any effect on anything like this.
Let's quit beating around the bush. We either pass serious gun control that would dramatically curb 2A Rights, or we accept that this kind of event will happen from time to time.
Even if you do the first, the second will still happen.
Quote:
Either way, let's be honest about it. "Universal background checks" isn't going to stop this from happening. 10 round limit on magazines isn't going to stop this. This guy reportedly fired only 13 rounds.
So, we either pass really strict laws that prevent even law abiding people from obtaining guns, or we accept events like these as the price we pay for gun Rights. There's no middle ground.
There have been over 172 mass killings between the years 2006 and 2011 by FBI count with some unreported which would take the count to well over 200 with firearms making up at least 77% of those mass killings.
One mass killing with 77% odds a gun was used, on average, every two weeks and you don't have a problem? Cripes!
And yet our murder rate has been dropping for more than 50 years...... so I don't think we have a problem. It's now half the rate of 1972.
This problem is minuscule compared to deaths by other means. And the rate continues to go down.
Our government kills more people every year than mass murderers do. Maybe we need to eliminate government or at least take their guns away.
Location: East St. Paul 651 forever (or North St. Paul) .
2,860 posts, read 3,386,800 times
Reputation: 1446
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo
Suck it up, white boy.
And you play your part, boy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beach Sportsfan
So where you ok when we have been hearing the latest killers being labeled as a Hispanic Illegal and a Muslim of Arab descent?
The perp in that - his race and religion were never mentioned once in the early reporting...not a peep. It wasn't until later that the MSM realized they had to come clean.
This one...boy they made damn SURE his race was front and center not even 24 hours after the incident. Makes me effin SICK.
We all KNOW if it had been a Muslim, or black man, or for that matter almost any "person of color" the MSM would NEVER have made that a focal point about their propaganda, now don't we?
Furthermore, the fact that there were only two fatalities? How many multiple fatality shooting are there every week in Chicago...by a "person of color"?
This just pisses me off.
Yes they put it front and center, "WHITE MALE" when it's obvious from his picture he's white. The media always downplays and hides race when a non-white commits notorious crime. Paint whites in the worst light possible and non-whites in the best light possible is what the progressive do. But that is not racist .
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.