Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-04-2015, 07:56 PM
 
Location: Atlantis
3,016 posts, read 3,909,526 times
Reputation: 8867

Advertisements

The least expensive form of birth control: anal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2015, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Iceland
876 posts, read 1,001,151 times
Reputation: 1018
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydive Outlaw View Post
The least expensive form of birth control: anal.
I hope you like AIDS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2015, 11:34 PM
 
32,067 posts, read 15,055,077 times
Reputation: 13684
Quote:
Originally Posted by hakkarin View Post
If I own a car and offer you a ride and you accept, and I then crash into something, then are you just as responsible because you were in the car when the crash happened? Because this is pretty much what women say when they claim the man is just as responsible for unwanted childbirth. It's a bull**** argument and just shows how women don't want responsibility when it doesn't suit them. If you believe your womb only belongs to you and that men should not have any say over it, then it's fair that you also take full responsibility for it. I am sick of listening to women whine about the lack of equality only to then refuse taking responsibility for themselves in favor of blaming men.
So you are saying men aren't responsible for getting a women pregnant. Who do you think gets them pregnant They don't do it by themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2015, 12:39 AM
 
Location: Mountain Home, ID
1,956 posts, read 3,635,181 times
Reputation: 2435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydive Outlaw View Post
The least expensive form of birth control: anal.
Actually, it is possible to get pregnant from anal sex. Look up splash conception.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2015, 07:50 AM
 
9,639 posts, read 6,016,325 times
Reputation: 8567
Quote:
Originally Posted by hakkarin View Post
I have heard claims going around by some people from the left that birth control should be subsidized so that people on lower incomes can get them to avoid unplanned pregnancy.

As a low-income earner myself, I find this to be utterly laughable.

Condoms are not that expensive. If a person is single, then their most likely method to get laid is by meeting women at clubs or bars, or in some other way have fun during the night. This will probably involve alcohol. Alcohol isn't exactly cheap, so if somebody can afford drinking then buying a condom is a trivial expense. But let's say they are in a relationship. Assuming they have sex 2-3 times a week, a decent sized box of condoms will last 2-3 weeks. So here the expense of condoms gets higher, but not to a point of being crazy expensive. Not to mention that now we have 2 people sharing the cost making it even less of a problem.

I'm sorry, but I just find the idea that poor people can't afford condoms to be utter nonsense. How can they afford booze but not condoms?

I'm sorry but I don't buy into your reasoning.
It's not done because they can't afford it.

It's done to encourage them to use it, leading to less babies, leading to less on welfare.

It's simple economics. Public birth control leads to less spent on welfare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2015, 08:07 AM
 
Location: Iceland
876 posts, read 1,001,151 times
Reputation: 1018
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
So you are saying men aren't responsible for getting a women pregnant. Who do you think gets them pregnant They don't do it by themselves.
This is exactly the kind of bull**** people are talking about when they claim women refuse to take responsibility for themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2015, 08:34 AM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,556,326 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by hakkarin View Post
This is exactly the kind of bull**** people are talking about when they claim women refuse to take responsibility for themselves.
So again, you're saying women magically get pregnant w/out a man or his semen? Are we talking a virgin mary pregnancy? You believe in that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2015, 09:26 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,000 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13699
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordSquidworth View Post
It's not done because they can't afford it.

It's done to encourage them to use it, leading to less babies, leading to less on welfare.

It's simple economics. Public birth control leads to less spent on welfare.
They already get publicly-funded birth control. Medicaid/CHIP already funds it, free to them. The deliberately CHOOSE to not use BC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2015, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,159,948 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by hakkarin View Post
Why can't "poor" people afford birth control?
Poor people cannot afford birth control due to unplanned tattoos.

If there was a federal Tattoo Stamp Program, then poor people could have tattoos and birth control.

Obama should immediately legislate the Affordable Tattoo Act using an Executive Order, because people are entitled to tattoos.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-06-2015, 11:08 AM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,985,550 times
Reputation: 7502
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
Poor people cannot afford birth control due to unplanned tattoos.

If there was a federal Tattoo Stamp Program, then poor people could have tattoos and birth control.

Obama should immediately legislate the Affordable Tattoo Act using an Executive Order, because people are entitled to tattoos.

Thank you for the laugh! Though I almost spit my water out all over the keyboard reading this. It's funny though, because it does seem that those who cry that they're poor (I'm by no means rich) have a ton of tattoos, which from what I understand are quite pricey. Hmmm.... spending money on some form of birth control to avoid unwanted pregnancies when you're not ready to support kids, or expensive tattoos? Priorities anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top