Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-11-2015, 10:01 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,932,293 times
Reputation: 3416

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
I don't know how any credible democrat can support her at this point. She's a serial liar.
How many "credible" democrats do you know?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-11-2015, 10:09 PM
 
Location: Hoosierville
17,355 posts, read 14,606,875 times
Reputation: 11578
... and no SSL certificate on the server.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2015, 10:23 PM
 
624 posts, read 378,869 times
Reputation: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckity View Post
... and no SSL certificate on the server.
Hopefully the same idiots who set up her security on the server are the ones that she charged to "destroy" the information on it. If so, they probably just hit "delete" on all the emails.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2015, 10:26 PM
 
Location: Hoosierville
17,355 posts, read 14,606,875 times
Reputation: 11578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winning Guy View Post
Hopefully the same idiots who set up her security on the server are the ones that she charged to "destroy" the information on it. If so, they probably just hit "delete" on all the emails.

Here's a great article that explains a lot:

How Unsafe Was Hillary Clinton's Secret Staff Email System?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 12:57 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,647 posts, read 26,361,465 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by daylux View Post
Any decent person would have stepped down or out of the race by now.

What does that have to do with the Clintons?

Anyways, that may not be an option at this point.

She still has that CF money trail to contend with.

The presidency may be her only way out.

She hasn`t mentioned a VP yet, but you can bet your last dollar he or she will be VP on the condition that a pardon will be given to Bill, Hilary and Chelsea for everything they ever did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 02:29 AM
 
Location: My little patch of Earth
6,193 posts, read 5,365,792 times
Reputation: 3059
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro69 View Post
Wonder how many years she'll get in the big house?
Aren't they allowed two terms?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 05:04 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,512,122 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
I don't know how any credible democrat can support her at this point. She's a serial liar.
Between their unflinching support for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, the reason appears quite clear.

They regard this sort of fundamental character flaw as a good thing.

Last edited by Spartacus713; 08-12-2015 at 05:23 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 05:42 AM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,969,382 times
Reputation: 1748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rescue3 View Post
No, not really. I was in the executive branch, I testified before congress and I had that clearance. SCI rules are SCI rules - period. Think of it as an umbrella - anything that is created under that umbrella must be protected to the degree called for by whatever program rules that domain. There are no exceptions. I mean none.

If the media reports are accurate about those docs being TS material from the SCI world, she is in a lose-lose position. If I were her lawyer, I'd be telling her about the advantages of just going away quietly right now. Fold your tent, go home and be a grandma, and hope like hell Obama tells his new AG to just let you slip silently into history.

She won't, but that's what would top my list of things to talk about Wednesday morning.
You might want to look into security clearance requirements for elected officials and appointees like Secretary of State.

Do you think somebody like Hillary Clinton could even pass a SCI clearance screening?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 05:49 AM
 
2,842 posts, read 2,327,126 times
Reputation: 3386
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rescue3 View Post
No, not really. I was in the executive branch, I testified before congress and I had that clearance. SCI rules are SCI rules - period. Think of it as an umbrella - anything that is created under that umbrella must be protected to the degree called for by whatever program rules that domain. There are no exceptions. I mean none.

If the media reports are accurate about those docs being TS material from the SCI world, she is in a lose-lose position. If I were her lawyer, I'd be telling her about the advantages of just going away quietly right now. Fold your tent, go home and be a grandma, and hope like hell Obama tells his new AG to just let you slip silently into history.

She won't, but that's what would top my list of things to talk about Wednesday morning.
I had a clearance as well. There really are no exceptions when it comes to SCI. Even the President complies with the protocols. If she did this, she's cooked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 05:57 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,033,369 times
Reputation: 3603
Story is getting mostly buried by most media outlets. NY Times doesnt even have it on the front page of their web site. I am so sick of the "news" media protecting people. Change out Hillary for Jeb or Trump or Cruz. You think the story gets buried? You think every news network across the country isnt leading with this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top