Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-12-2015, 07:00 AM
 
58,522 posts, read 26,824,792 times
Reputation: 14108

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don9 View Post
Security clearance rules might be different when you are part of the executive branch and congress.
They are NOT!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-12-2015, 07:01 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,010,329 times
Reputation: 3600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
They are NOT!
Exactly. There are not separate written rules for classified info based on who you are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 07:13 AM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,945,705 times
Reputation: 1748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
They are NOT!
Have you read Obama's executive orders relating to the creation of classified information?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 07:48 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,010,329 times
Reputation: 3600
The FBI should have the server soon. Hillary team already admitted to wiping it clean. We can only hope that the FBI is able to do some massive recovery on it.

I dont expect the DOJ to do much of anything. They're corrupt and I dont see that changing now unless they feel its time to do away with the Clintons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 08:19 AM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,945,705 times
Reputation: 1748
Here is an interesting read

How Intelligence-Sharing Works at Present
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 08:35 AM
 
4,040 posts, read 2,539,291 times
Reputation: 4009
I applaud the fact that no one has come to her "defense".

Just the one guy who seems to be implying that what she did was OK because "maybe" the rules are different concerning appointees?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 08:37 AM
 
17,330 posts, read 9,145,351 times
Reputation: 11773
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
The FBI should have the server soon. Hillary team already admitted to wiping it clean. We can only hope that the FBI is able to do some massive recovery on it.

I dont expect the DOJ to do much of anything. They're corrupt and I dont see that changing now unless they feel its time to do away with the Clintons.
The FBI found the company that hosted the server last week in Denver. I posted it in several other threads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 08:39 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,467,047 times
Reputation: 8094
Sorry, I can't hear you. What do you want to show me? I can't see that either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 08:42 AM
 
14,295 posts, read 9,633,571 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumf View Post
I have a very high security clearance.
I know what it takes to get a classified document on to a non-classified system.
You don't 'accidentally' do it... It doesn't 'just' happen.

As Tilt11 stated: Time to charge her... to the fullest extent of the law.
Agreed. No one with half a brain would email even a confidential document to anyone not authorized to see it, and certainly not to an unauthorized email sever.

You have to document the chain of custody trail for all confidential and above. Every time you email a document you are creating a new copy of it, and this needs to be documented. The recipient must follow all the same protocol and procedures to ensure security of that document, the same as anyone else who is allowed access and possession.

Hilary cannot just decide to make an undocumented copy of a document classified as secret and give it to someone else, without following the rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2015, 08:44 AM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,010,329 times
Reputation: 3600
Something I dont fully understand and need some clarification on. Two things really.

1. Is it legal or not for her to have used a private server? I hear conflicting things on this.

2. If it is legal, why is it legal? Everyone knows that things can be unlcass one day, yet changed to classified later. So why would they allow the chance to be taken on a private server? How much sense does that make for security reasons?

And really, legal or not, it shows carelessness by Hillary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top