Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-01-2015, 07:05 AM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,969,382 times
Reputation: 1748

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chango View Post
The news has come that Russia is sending military forces to Syria and is currently setting up a forward base near Damascus (Russian Military Forces Arrive In Syria, Set Forward Operating Base Near Damascus | Zero Hedge). Saudi Arabia and the UAE have invaded Yemen with ground troops( Open War In Yemen! Saudi Arabia and UAE Invade ). Ukraine has of course lost the Crimea to Russia and is nearing collapse due to it's civil war. US, UK, French and a host of NATO forces have been actively at war for over a decade and Israel is bombing inside virtually all it's neighbor's boundaries with impunity. Isis is raging across the Middle East committing daily atrocities with the honest belief that we're in the end of days and even North and South Korea were shooting at each other just a couple weeks ago. Things keep "randomly" blowing up in China quite spectacularly and sustained cyberwar attacks continue 24/7 with a vast majority of attacks originating from China ( Norse Attack Map ) Meanwhile currency manipulation and stock market crashes are called "acts of war" and bring carnage to the global economy.

No, it's not your granddaddy's World War but how can anyone say the world isn't at war!? Do we need more than the 2 dozen countries actively fighting the current (mostly) interconnected wars right now? Do we need more than just the several hundred thousand people killed during the past decade or so from the fighting, a bigger displacement of refugees than the tsunami of people pouring into Europe to escape the carnage of their homelands? Does there have to be a war bonds campaign or Bob Hope performing in an army uniform for it to count as a "World War"? Is it not "WW3" until after the nukes are launched? (BTW... they *might* have already started with those too: Possible Tactical Nuclear Strike (Neutron Bomb) in Yemen? | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization)


I would guess the average American thought "so what" when Hitler invaded Poland and considered the Japanese invasion of Manchuria and massive military buildup to be "none of (our) business". But we've gotta wake up... WW3 has already started without any official announcement and we're too busy looking at Miley's boobs, hating people who aren't the same color as us or watching Trump act like a chimp in a bid to be the king of fools to notice!
You can call it WW3 because by definition it is but don't expect the government, military and media to say it since they want to keep the people in the dark.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:15 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top