Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-23-2015, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,935,420 times
Reputation: 3416

Advertisements

I Don't think anyone is going to "get her", but if you can watch this fiasco and still not see that she is lying and is covering up, then you are either blind, naive, or just simply caught up in "the splendor" that you refuse to see what is painfully obvious. Nobody is as stupid as Hillary is claiming to be. If in fact she is that stupid, do you really want her as your president? Really?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-23-2015, 05:25 PM
 
26,494 posts, read 15,070,512 times
Reputation: 14643
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Where does this article say she lied ???
Are you saying that she hasn't lied multiple times on this topic?

Even liberal leaning organizations are admitting that there are new revelations this week of new Hillary lies.

State Department


Quote:
Story 1: The State De*part*ment con*firmed that Clin*ton turned over her email only after Con*gress dis*covered that she had ex*clus*ively used a private email sys*tem. Ac*cord*ing to The Wash*ing*ton Post, the de*part*ment first con*tac*ted her in the sum*mer of 2014, at least three months be*fore the agency asked Clin*ton and three of her pre*de*cessors to provide their emails.

The story un*der*cuts Clin*ton’s claim that her de*cision to turn over self-se*lec*ted email was a re*sponse to a routine-sound*ing re*cords re*quest. She hasn’t been telling the truth.

Story 2: A fed*er*al court has helped un*cov*er more emails re*lated to the Benghazi raid that were with*held from con*gres*sion*al in*vest*ig*at*ors. Clin*ton has in*sisted she turned over all her work-re*lated email and com*plied with con*gres*sion*al sub*poen*as.
Again, she hasn’t been telling the truth.

Story 3: The FBI has re*covered per*son*al and work-re*lated e-mails from her private serv*er, rais*ing the pos*sib*il*ity that the de*leted in*form*a*tion be*comes pub*lic. “The FBI is in*vest*ig*at*ing how and why clas*si*fied in*form*a*tion ended up on Clin*ton’s serv*er,” Bloomberg re*por*ted.

While the Demo*crat*ic front-run*ner still in*sists there was no clas*si*fied in*form*a*tion on the un*se*cured serv*er, the FBI has moved bey*ond wheth*er U.S. secrets were in*volved to how and why. In the lan*guage of law en*force*ment, the FBI is in*vest*ig*at*ing her motive.
NationalJournal


These are just the latest lies of Hillary. Do I need to restate all of the previous lies of Hillary on this topic?


At least a dozen times she has made erroneous comments.....Either Hillary is a blithering incompetent idiot or she is a pathological liar. If it is the former than she is unfit to be president. If it is the later, why is she lying so profusely on this issue? It would likely be because she did something that would prevent her from becoming president, or else why lie so much about everything on the issue?

You sheep are ruining this country. Don't be a slave to politicians, break the chains and free your brain. Be a man and have your own thoughts. We are not a banana republic (yet), save rule of law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Texas
2,847 posts, read 2,517,225 times
Reputation: 1775
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
I guess you should read the article and the line you posted again and then you will understand why I said what I said.


notice how the article itself separates the multiple claims with in it as to not open themselves up to the same scrutiny that the NYT got.

The article doesnt even claim the work emails were deleted. read the actual wording of the sentence you are going to eventually try to quote in your defense.



no mention of these emails being work related, only that they were deleted and now in the hands of the FBI.

The spin stops here..........

September 25, 2015

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Defense Department has found an email chain that Hillary Clinton did not give to the State Department, the State Department said on Friday, despite her saying she had provided all work emails from her time as secretary of state.

Government finds new emails Clinton did not hand over | Reuters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 05:29 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,543,209 times
Reputation: 6392
If Obama didn't want to mess with Hillary this would not be actively investigated.

The question is - does he just want her out of the race or does he want her in prison?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 07:19 PM
 
934 posts, read 595,410 times
Reputation: 326
Everyone deletes emails.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 08:10 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,309,299 times
Reputation: 7623
Quote:
Originally Posted by blind melon View Post
Everyone deletes emails.
But not everyone has classified information on their emails.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 08:53 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,573 posts, read 17,281,298 times
Reputation: 37310
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
We heard that "we got her!" moment was right around the corner again and again and again during the interminable Benghazi hearings, and now we're hearing the same thing again and again and again with the emails. You're right, this latest news is nothing really new at all, but it's sure got them all excited once again. I find it amusing how they grab onto every molecule of hope that this time will really be it.

But on the bright side, having the right endlessly chasing their tails keeps them busy, at least.
No one wants to "get her". The right wants her to win the nomination, and the reason is obvious.
The only people who now will support her were never going to be Republican voters, anyway.

If it all works out perfectly, she will never be convicted of anything, or even charged.

The Benghazi hearing have been enormously successful. After all, those hearings led to the private server revelations, which led to the deleted emails, which led to the numerous lies, which have now led to an example of perjury.
If all goes well, the hearings will go on for another year and a half.

The most welcome sound in the world is, "You got nuthin' on her"!
Because we don't need anything.
We just need to keep revealing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 09:02 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,935,420 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
No one wants to "get her". The right wants her to win the nomination, and the reason is obvious.
The only people who now will support her were never going to be Republican voters, anyway.

If it all works out perfectly, she will never be convicted of anything, or even charged.

The Benghazi hearing have been enormously successful. After all, those hearings led to the private server revelations, which led to the deleted emails, which led to the numerous lies, which have now led to an example of perjury.
If all goes well, the hearings will go on for another year and a half.

The most welcome sound in the world is, "You got nuthin' on her"!
Because we don't need anything.
We just need to keep revealing.
Exactly... Reveal her for what she is and let her popularity go off the cliff, while those who support her work tirelessly to get her the nomination. Once she gets it, she will still be entangled in her own web and will lose the election in dramatic fashion. Who needs a conviction? Just do us a favor Ms Clinton, keep on lying and withholding evidence. Keep talking in circles and acting as though you are technically challenged. That is certainly the what those of us who despise you want to see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 09:06 PM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,073,833 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
No one wants to "get her". The right wants her to win the nomination, and the reason is obvious.
The only people who now will support her were never going to be Republican voters, anyway.

If it all works out perfectly, she will never be convicted of anything, or even charged.

The Benghazi hearing have been enormously successful. After all, those hearings led to the private server revelations, which led to the deleted emails, which led to the numerous lies, which have now led to an example of perjury.
If all goes well, the hearings will go on for another year and a half.

The most welcome sound in the world is, "You got nuthin' on her"!
Because we don't need anything.
We just need to keep revealing.
Yeah, I have no doubt the hearings will continue for at least another year and a half. At least you're honest about it and admit it's all about smearing her ahead of the 2016 election. Benghazi went on for years; why should anyone expect any different from this one? Long, drawn out "investigations" of their opponents that waste time and resources and produce nothing is a hallmark of today's GOP.

"We just need to keep revealing?" Yeah, right. The problem is, you just keep "revealing" nothing. Zip. Zero. Nada. How is that "throw a bunch of spaghetti at the wall and hope something sticks" approach worked out for you so far?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2015, 09:06 PM
NCN
 
Location: NC/SC Border Patrol
21,663 posts, read 25,628,401 times
Reputation: 24375
I just wonder where that person on this forum is that blasted me because he said my husband didn't know what he was talking about when he said she may have deleted them but they are still there. My husband has found many things on our computer when we deleted them then decided we needed them again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:27 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top