Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
These are the goto excuses to ease ones conscience; deny the truth in the first place. They claimed the same thing with ACORN, even as ACORN executives were being handed federal sentences.
de·ni·al
noun: denial
the action of declaring something to be untrue
Yeah, that's what they tell us. If they call it "tissue," (and they admitted to this) they can get away with it. But we know what's happening.Let's just stop the lies, shall we?
oh let's call it baby pieces because that way maybe you can create enough fake drama to get all abortion outlawed. You betcha
No I don't get the point because you are mistaken. They have to account for the federal money they receive they can't just put it all in one bucket and spend it on whatever they like
He means if someone(the federal government) gives you(2sleepy) money to pay your electric bill, then you have more of your own money that you have earned from another source to use for dining out. If you don't have to pay for your electricity you have more expendable income.
How is that different for anyone else who has two jobs and no paid time off and still has to deal with their Obamacare plan's doctor, clinic, and hospital restrictions?
You missed the whole discussion about how the poor generally has little or no access to medical care because if they are on medicaid a majority of doctors will refuse to see them because of low reimbursement rates, and if they don't get medicaid no doctors will see them, their care is either in an ER, a charity clinic or planned parenthood will treat them huh?
The most that any state will ever have to pay for expanded medicaid is 10% and that won't kick in until 2020, it's funny how these "poor states" have money to spend on implementing voter ID laws, or locking up thousands of their citizens for non-violent crimes, but they can't pay 10% of their poorest citizens health insurance premium.
10 percent is a sizeable chunk of change to some of the poorer states. Just imagine 10 percent of your own income leaving your wallet. And it is naive on anyones part, Democrat or Republican, to ever believe a financial estimate from the U.S. government. They are incapable of keeping spending down.
You missed the whole discussion about how the poor generally has little or no access to medical care because if they are on medicaid a majority of doctors will refuse to see them because of low reimbursement rates, and if they don't get medicaid no doctors will see them, their care is either in an ER, a charity clinic or planned parenthood will treat them huh?
Obamacare is a totally Dem deal. They had free reign to pass whatever they wanted. Why didn't the Dems fix any of those problems?
This was a totally Dem deal. Why didn't the Affordable Care Act actually make medical care affordable?
When a politician names a bill, it's usually an antonym.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy
You missed the whole discussion about how the poor generally has little or no access to medical care because if they are on medicaid a majority of doctors will refuse to see them because of low reimbursement rates, and if they don't get medicaid no doctors will see them, their care is either in an ER, a charity clinic or planned parenthood will treat them huh?
What is ACA in affect? An expansion of Medicaid, and a redistribution of middle class wealth to fund said expansion.
Who benefits more, the poor or the insurance industry who wrote ACA?
You claim others to be missing the discussion while you're missing the facts entirely.
“The expansion of Obamacare will cost our state taxpayers $5 billion,” Florida Gov. Rick Scott said in an interview with POLITICO last week, referring to the 10-year cost
When a politician names a bill, it's usually an antonym.
What is ACA in affect? An expansion of Medicaid, and a redistribution of middle class wealth to fund said expansion.Who benefits more, the poor or the insurance industry who wrote ACA? You claim others to be missing the discussion while you're missing the facts entirely.
I'm not defending the ACA so you probably would do well to try that argument on someone who is interested.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That makes sense (said no one ever) But that's not the end of the story, he could have covered 470 million of that 500 million 
