Russia Has Conducted 500 Airstrikes Against ISIS in Two Weeks

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA

It appears no one here has heard of operation Inherent Resolve? Russia has only, oh, about 6,800 strikes to go. If one believes the "500 number", and why would anyone do that?

Special Report: Inherent Resolve

Effin' Denmark has flown 500+ missions against ISIS.

Don't you guys read newspapers?

Yes, they read the "Daily Sheeple", "The Onion" and "Ria Prostnie".

[Old Gringo]

Originally Posted by KRAMERCAT

At least someone's kicking ISIS ass...too bad it's Putin and not Obama.

Why?

Let the Russians go in there and get bogged down in a never-ending quagmire.

There is no "win" in the middle east.

'Russia has seriously weakened the Islamic State over there with a fresh round of airstrikes.'

Russia Has Conducted 500 Airstrikes Against ISIS in Two Weeks | The Daily Sheeple

We'll see. Word is that they're not dropping much ordnance on ISIS but on other rebel groups opposing Assad.

In any case, I'm grinning at Putin's move to prop up his client.

IMHO, we should withdraw all US personnel and equipment from the middle east immediately and let those fools have at it. None of them is a friend.

[Scratch33]

Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA

It appears no one here has heard of operation Inherent Resolve? Russia has only, oh, about 6,800 strikes to go. If one believes the "500 number", and why would anyone do that?

Special Report: Inherent Resolve

Effin' Denmark has flown 500+ missions against ISIS.

Don't you guys read newspapers?

Shhhh! You're spoiling the moment!

[burdell]

Originally Posted by Goodnight

Ah yes Russia is winning the war. LOL, just wait

Why are Russian bombs so much more powerful and accurate than the US air strikes?
How do they win without ground troops?

Because in the context of this thread the right's adoration of Putin makes them so?

[mike1003]

Originally Posted by MIKEETC

They accomplished their mission and went home.

[oops...different country ]

Not working out too well for us is it?

[Dmitri95]

Originally Posted by desertdetroiter

Don't menace them and they won't menace you.

But you're not interested in that.

Not true at all. Your logic sounds like "well, if she didn't wear that dress, she wouldn't be raped". They hate infidels. Their holy book commands them to seek us out and slaughter us wherever we are to be found. End the victim blaming already.

[boxus]

In the mean time, in that lovely, US supported utopia of Saudi Arabia; Mother of Saudi youth facing beheading urges Obama to intervene

Wow, beheading for protesting, now that is one hell of a great regime to support. Yes, Saudi Arabia is the vocal and material supporter of the Syrian rebels, Saudi Arabia wants yet another lovely regime like their's installed in Syria.

And the US fully supports these wackos, yet Russia as so much bans gay propaganda, the US acts like the damn world is ending.

[Kracer]

Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber

So says "Ria Novosti" a Russian propaganda rag. Putin is bombing the anti-Assad rebels, not ISIS. Don't believe everything you read in Russian papers.

Putin and obama use their respective propaganda machines to embellish their accomplishments.

It seems both were schooled form the same book.

[Maksim_Frolov]

Originally Posted by Old Gringo

We'll see. Word is that they're not dropping much ordnance on ISIS but on other rebel groups opposing Assad.

Only army of Assad can cope with ISIS. This is the only army that can spend a ground operation. But Assad's army can not fight with ISIS, when opposition exists in the rear of the army. Oppositions may backstab at any time. Destruction of the opposition is a logical step for the victory over the ISIS.

[Goinback2011]

Hey Obots...why are O's new BFFs the Iranians siding with Russia on this? Could it be they are humiliting your messiah?