Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You're not answering the question. Name one terrorist attack inside the United States under Clinton or Obama, in which Americans died, that you give them the same kind of pass you expect us to give Bush for 9/11.
None of you can do that. All you can do is babble on about how Obama was given a name. What the **** good does one name do? They probably have thousands of names. Bush on the other hand was told that they were intending to use airplanes. Now there are actions you can take with that info that may have helped prevent 9/11. Locking the cockpit doors for example.
I don't think anyone "Gave Bush a pass". He did react after the fact, for better or worse. That is why we have the TSA, HSA, the Patriot Act and are in a war in Afghanistan.
What actions did Obama take after Fort Hood or the Boston Bombing to secure this country from similar attacks? Oh...wait...he imported more of his buddies from 3rd world Muslim countries that commit these acts. I knew there had to be something that he did! Oh, and labeled vets, terrorists, don't forget that one.
Name one terrorist attack inside the United States under Clinton or Obama, in which Americans died, that you give them the same kind of pass you expect us to give Bush for 9/11.
Name one terrorist attack inside the United States under Clinton or Obama, in which Americans died, that you give them the same kind of pass you expect us to give Bush for 9/11.
USS Cole bombing. While technically not "inside" the US, it was a terrorist attack against a US military vessel.
Well, let's recap. You asked us to name a terrorist attack inside the US where people were killed and for which we give a pass to Obama like you say we do to GWB for 9/11.
My response? Who said I give a pass to Barack Obama? I don't. His FBI was dispatched by Russian intelligence to question Tamerlin Tsarnaev. They chatted with him and after that he fell off the radar. Because of that, people were killed by a terrorist attack right here in the United States under Barack Obama.
Which one of the 9/11 terrorists had a face to face interview with the FBI while Bush was President? None.
Your strawman is really a pretty putrid attempt at logic. The question is not blame, but whether the government can actually keep us safe or not.
Remember, the government keeps you "safe" until it doesn't keep you safe. Even your messiah Barack is not brave enough to brag about keeping you safe because he knows full well that tomorrow another 9/11 could happen in the USA.
He's not that stupid. Can we say the same for you?
You're still not making any sense at all. The OP reads
"Name one terrorist attack inside the United States under Clinton or Obama, in which Americans died, that you give them the same kind of pass you expect us to give Bush for 9/11."
There's nothing in there saying anybody gave Obama any kind of pass
Well, let's recap. You asked us to name a terrorist attack inside the US where people were killed and for which we give a pass to Obama like you say we do to GWB for 9/11.
My response? Who said I give a pass to Barack Obama? I don't. His FBI was dispatched by Russian intelligence to question Tamerlin Tsarnaev. They chatted with him and after that he fell off the radar. Because of that, people were killed by a terrorist attack right here in the United States under Barack Obama.
Which one of the 9/11 terrorists had a face to face interview with the FBI while Bush was President? None.
Your strawman is really a pretty putrid attempt at logic. The question is not blame, but whether the government can actually keep us safe or not.
Remember, the government keeps you "safe" until it doesn't keep you safe. Even your messiah Barack is not brave enough to brag about keeping you safe because he knows full well that tomorrow another 9/11 could happen in the USA.
He's not that stupid. Can we say the same for you?
They chatted with him and during that chat he told them about his plans to bomb the Boston Marathon? Is that what happened?
You're not answering the question. Name one terrorist attack inside the United States under Clinton or Obama, in which Americans died, that you give them the same kind of pass you expect us to give Bush for 9/11.
None of you can do that. All you can do is babble on about how Obama was given a name. What the **** good does one name do? They probably have thousands of names. Bush on the other hand was told that they were intending to use airplanes. Now there are actions you can take with that info that may have helped prevent 9/11. Locking the cockpit doors for example.
The Oklahoma City bombing. I don't think there's any question that was a terrorist bombing. An American terrorist. While Clinton was in office. I don't remember Clinton being demonized for that. At least, not to the extent that Bush was blamed and is still being blamed for everything bad that happened. Thanks to the lawsuits that followed that election, nobody was really minding the store when 9/11 happened.
It was also around 1995, that they caught some terrorists in the Philippines and found plans that specified using hijacked planes be crashed into cities. So crashing planes into cities was a a pretty old idea and became a pretty common threat by the year 2000. The intelligence communities receives thousands of similar vague threats everyday. The problem is sifting through and identifying which is credible and which aren't.
And I'm not a leftwing nor right wing nut, Liberal nor Conservative, Democrat nor Republican. Just an American, that still believes in our Constitution. That our politicians, on both sides, swore to defend and protect, while the first thing they do when they get into office is undermine it.
You can go on and on and hate other people that don't believe as you do - your fellow Americans. That's what the politicians want you to be doing, so they can keep on looting and destroying our country. To keep you distracted.
It's a pretty simple concept: Divide and conquer. Go on. keep on falling for that. Keep on voting to keep them in office. Everything is getting better, right?
Status:
"Apparently the worst poster on CD"
(set 22 days ago)
27,631 posts, read 16,115,213 times
Reputation: 19027
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv
Besides Waco was not a terrorist attack
Pass givin.. thread fail
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
