Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-24-2015, 08:42 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,879,874 times
Reputation: 11259

Advertisements

We really need to address the current unfunded liabilities in the Medicare program before expanding it. Medicare is currently woefully underfunded.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-24-2015, 08:51 PM
 
18,984 posts, read 9,067,948 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Forget it. The Dems decided that a Obamacare is the answer to all your health insurance needs.

So suck it up and live with it.
The Dems passed what they could at the time, and it's better than what was in place before. But I doubt you will find a single Democrat who wouldn't be more than happy to end the ACA and go to single payer. The big obstacle that is still standing in the way of that is, as always, the GOP.

But hey, good news! The Republicans voted yesterday to repeal the ACA again! Number 61 this time. Though they still have absolutely nothing to replace it with. You would think after five years they would come up with some alternative plan, but nope. I guess they're too busy with their nine pretend Benghazi investigations to do any real work like writing a healthcare bill.

Last edited by JAMS14; 10-24-2015 at 09:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 09:00 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,879,874 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
The Dems passed what they could at the time, and it's better than what was in place before. But I doubt you will find a single Democrat who wouldn't be more than happy to end the ACA and go to single payer. The big obstacle that is still standing in the way of that is, as always, the GOP.
I have not seen the Democrats even make a proposal to fully fund Medicare. I would say that is because the obstacle is the taxpaying voter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 09:01 PM
 
513 posts, read 580,593 times
Reputation: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by natalie469 View Post
Don't blame it on Obama, he wanted a single payer system which republicans were against.
Democrats had the majority in both houses and yet still couldn't reach a consensus amongst their own caucuses. Democrats used budget reconcilliation to force it Obamacare through both houses. Don't blame it on Republicans, they were kept in the doghouse from day one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KRAMERCAT View Post
We pay comparable taxes... and no free healthcare thank you.
Actually in countries with UHC everyone has to pay taxes to the federal government. In such countries there exists no EITC, 47%, etc. If our 47% were forced to pay taxes to fund a universal health care system, the Capitol would be burned to the ground.

Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
It's the best we could do, thanks to Republicans. It's better than what preceded it, no thanks to Republicans.

So suck it up and be damn grateful for Obamacare.

You're welcome.
Again Republicans were allowed zero input from day one. Democrats couldn't pass UHC because it didn't have enough support in either of their caucuses so they forced through the travesty of Obamacare using budget reconcilliation. Don't blame it on Republicans when they didn't even have the numbers to stop it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Tip of the Sphere. Just the tip.
4,540 posts, read 2,765,810 times
Reputation: 5277
In time Medicare will cover every American.

Old people are by and large happy with it. But somehow Republicans think Medicare won't work for the rest of us?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 09:30 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,879,874 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by turkey-head View Post
In time Medicare will cover every American.

Old people are by and large happy with it. But somehow Republicans think Medicare won't work for the rest of us?
When are the Democrats going to propose to fully fund Medicare as it exists today?

Currently a Japanese multi-national pays 85% of my healthcare costs. Are they going to continue to do so?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2015, 09:31 PM
 
18,984 posts, read 9,067,948 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by BirchBarlow View Post
Again Republicans were allowed zero input from day one. Democrats couldn't pass UHC because it didn't have enough support in either of their caucuses so they forced through the travesty of Obamacare using budget reconcilliation. Don't blame it on Republicans when they didn't even have the numbers to stop it.
It's amazing how the Republicans continue to claim they had zero input when 160 Republican amendments were added to the bill at their request.

"July 15, 2009--The Senate's Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee passes The Affordable Health Choices Act. The bipartisan bill includes more than 160 Republican amendments accepted during the month-long mark-up, one of the longest in congressional history."

Timeline of the health care law - CNNPolitics.com

Gee--how did all of those Republican amendments get there in during a bipartisan process that lasted longer than any other in congressional history if Republicans were "allowed zero input from day one"????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2015, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,212 posts, read 19,509,699 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
It's amazing how the Republicans continue to claim they had zero input when 160 Republican amendments were added to the bill at their request.

"July 15, 2009--The Senate's Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee passes The Affordable Health Choices Act. The bipartisan bill includes more than 160 Republican amendments accepted during the month-long mark-up, one of the longest in congressional history."

Timeline of the health care law - CNNPolitics.com

Gee--how did all of those Republican amendments get there in during a bipartisan process that lasted longer than any other in congressional history if Republicans were "allowed zero input from day one"????
That's a great question, you are deconstructing their talking points. Well done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2015, 08:30 AM
 
58,973 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRAMERCAT View Post
This would level the playing field with the private healthcare companies that are gouging Americans. Most Western countries provide free healthcare, and if we can't get that, at least we need healthcare that is truly affordable (not the Obama version). I have paid into Medicare since I was 16, and don't mind paying a reasonable fee for getting it. The Medicare system is already built, just let us access it. The gov would still make money on it.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/core-o...160003710.html
"Most Western countries provide free healthcare"

You lost what little credibility you might have had with this one.

You, and many liberals like you continue to make this claim which is a LIE.

The health care is provided THROUGH the TAX DOLLARS the countries collect, therefore it is NOT "free"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2015, 08:51 AM
 
58,973 posts, read 27,267,735 times
Reputation: 14265
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Your money has been spent and they are hoping you die before you collect, SS currently has a "surplus" but it's IOU's used to prop up other spending. You're the one paying for the benefits of those collecting now.

Where do you propose getting the funding for this?
"SS currently has a "surplus"


"Social Security Deficits: Permanent and Growing Social Security began running cash-flow deficits in 2010, paying out $51 billion more in benefits than the program received in payroll taxes that year. Without reforms, Social Security's cash-flow deficits will rise rapidly and will quadruple in less than 20 years, when its combined trust fund would be exhausted.
INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS (2014)



Social Security Deficits: Permanent and Growing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top