Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
One thing that doesn't get a lot of play, is that Mexico is unlikely to support any plans to ship millions of illegal immigrants back to its country - due to the fact that it would hurt the Mexican economy.
Usually, it is just covered in snippets like "given the importance of remittances, economically disadvantageous."
Perhaps it isn't focused on, because some might conclude it is economically hurting us to have them. However, why would Mexico accept millions of low wage/low skill people back into their country, considering it would harm their economy?
There is a reason after all, why Mexico has much more stringent laws against illegal immigration (and even legal immigrants getting citizenship).
So? I couldn't care less what happens to Mexico. Mexico is like a boil on our butt that needs to be lanced. Let the corruption leak out and start over again.
For all the grandstanding, there won't be anything done. This isn't anything new. The ONLY president to ever do anything close to significant was Eisenhower. That was almost 60 years ago.
Trump is the only candidate calling for mass deportation.
It will not matter who gets elected. There will be no mass deportation.
Why should we care about Mexico? Did they care about the devastation to our own citizens by millions of their citizens coming here illegally sucking us dry?
It will not matter who gets elected. There will be no mass deportation.
You are right. And no politician is willing to go directly after the cause. They talk band-aids on the symptoms. They would lose all funding from corporate America(Campaign funding), that wants the cheap labor to drive down their overhead and increase profits for the shareholders....
Seizure of all assets. Business and personal, if you employ a Tourist.
One thing that doesn't get a lot of play, is that Mexico is unlikely to support any plans to ship millions of illegal immigrants back to its country - due to the fact that it would hurt the Mexican economy.
Usually, it is just covered in snippets like "given the importance of remittances, economically disadvantageous."
Perhaps it isn't focused on, because some might conclude it is economically hurting us to have them. However, why would Mexico accept millions of low wage/low skill people back into their country, considering it would harm their economy?
There is a reason after all, why Mexico has much more stringent laws against illegal immigration (and even legal immigrants getting citizenship).
and this matters because?
Their people, their issues to deal with. Why should the USA or any other country be responsible for Mexican citizens?
Cut off those transfers and watch Mexico sweat. They will be more cooperative with the deportation process.
There is no reason to not impose a 90% tax on all money transfers south of the border.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
