Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's amazing how these terrorists are successfully attacking many of the most powerful countries in the world, and they just do nothing about it. It doesn't matter what weapons we have because liberal tolerance will continue to let them run amok. We can't have national security if it means someone's feelings might get hurt.
So is this what you wanted, liberals? All these deaths in France. All these crime waves hitting countries that let the "migrants" in?
I dont know what you are talking about. A liberal (Obama) got the worlds most wanted terrorist (Bin Laden) while conservatives (Bush and Cheney) were ok with Bin Laden running loose around the world.
In America, it's the "liberals" who are tough on terrorism. It was President Obama who successfully nabbed Bin Laden and decimated Al-Qaeda, which ran wild when Dumbya Bush was in office.
Conservatives, meanwhile, want to spend trillions of American taxpayer dollars overthrowing secular dictators (i.e., Saddam Hussein), which de-stabiilizes the Middle East and allows Islamic fundamentalism to run wild. ISIS is the direct result of failed GOP policies in the ME.
And don't take my word for it. Just ask Trump (the current clown leading the GOP freak show). Even he admits it.
As far as the Paris attacks are concerned, that's a French problem. Let them deal with it. The US cannot be the world's policeman forever. The Euros need to step up.
It's amazing how these terrorists are successfully attacking many of the most powerful countries in the world, and they just do nothing about it. It doesn't matter what weapons we have because liberal tolerance will continue to let them run amok. We can't have national security if it means someone's feelings might get hurt.
So is this what you wanted, liberals? All these deaths in France. All these crime waves hitting countries that let the "migrants" in?
I take it they are gracious hosts initially until the savage cretins start ravaging everything, including the women and children. It's too late by then as there are too many there.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, BHO seeks to bilaterally sidestep the 2A and ban guns. Why do we want AKs and standard mags? We will be the militia fighting the enemy accepted as domestic by the left.
Let's go bomb and invade some random countries with ground troops!! That is the obvious thing that we need to do.
Let's call the countries we pick axis of evil 2.0 -- Russia, Syria and China. When this boneheaded strategy blows up in our faces, let's blame the "libs" and call for more stupid, ham-fisted actions.
Let's call the countries we pick axis of evil 2.0 -- Russia, Syria and China. When this boneheaded strategy blows up in our faces, let's blame the "libs" and call for more stupid, ham-fisted actions.
Progressives and their leftist, Rockefeller Republican dandies across the aisle are already predictably on Syria, after irretrievably and purposely wrecking Libya.
In America, it's the "liberals" who are tough on terrorism. It was President Obama who successfully nabbed Bin Laden and decimated Al-Qaeda, which ran wild when Dumbya Bush was in office.
Conservatives, meanwhile, want to spend trillions of American taxpayer dollars overthrowing secular dictators (i.e., Saddam Hussein), which de-stabiilizes the Middle East and allows Islamic fundamentalism to run wild. ISIS is the direct result of failed GOP policies in the ME.
And don't take my word for it. Just ask Trump (the current clown leading the GOP freak show). Even he admits it.
As far as the Paris attacks are concerned, that's a French problem. Let them deal with it. The US cannot be the world's policeman forever. The Euros need to step up.
So BHO takes out the leaders of Egypt, Libya, supposedly Bin Laden - the symbol of Al Quaeda and others such as ISIS, ISIL. It's beyond a hosed SNAFU. He also pushes on Putin in a stupid manner. Putin would be harder on BHO than Khrushchev was on JFK.
Let's talk again about who is overthrowing secular dictators and destabilizing the middle east allowing Islamic fundamentalism to run wild.
Progressives and their leftist, Rockefeller Republican dandies across the aisle are already predictably on Syria, after irretrievably and puposely wrecking Libya.
"Progressives = soft on terrorism" is the topic of this thread. You're throwing a monkey wrench in it by calling them warmongers.
Pick a lane, please.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
