Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-23-2015, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,735,123 times
Reputation: 9325

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceist View Post
Are you serious? What do you not understand about the statement "every single major Science Institution worldwide"? Do you really not know WHY all the major Science Institutions worldwide accept anthropogenic climate change? Because of the long established physics and the overwhelming consilience of evidence presented in tens of thousands of published research papers. I only noted the APS because they just announced that they had recently updated their previous 2007 Statement on Climate Change.

It's like you've never heard of the concept of 'evidence' in science.
And the concept of federal grants in science.

 
Old 11-23-2015, 12:48 PM
 
4,873 posts, read 3,600,891 times
Reputation: 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
I don't recall ever using the word "conspiracy" in the AGW context.

Try again.
"I mean sure, I claimed every government and climate scientist in the world is engaged in a concerted, organized effort to perpetuate a global fabrication, but I never said 'conspiracy!'"
 
Old 11-23-2015, 12:49 PM
 
4,873 posts, read 3,600,891 times
Reputation: 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
And the concept of federal grants in science.
Those poor out-spent energy companies.
 
Old 11-23-2015, 01:08 PM
 
30,063 posts, read 18,660,332 times
Reputation: 20879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Translation: "Any source that does not support the AGW hoax agenda is anti-science propaganda".

Got it.

That is correct.

I love it when you provide the CO2 data over the history of the planet and show that CO2 levels used to be 4-5X higher than they are now. Libs just don't seem to have an answer for that.

Further, libs have no answer for why temps increased in the 1930s during the Great Depression, while man-made global CO2 levels plummeted.

Cults reject contrary data and a strict examination of thier beliefs. Science welcomes further questioning.
 
Old 11-23-2015, 01:24 PM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,442,664 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMiller View Post
But that 1930s drought was at least partly man-made as well, namely exacerbated by unsustainable farming practices.


To the extent the models have failed, they've largely underestimated how badly the climate has changed. For example, sea level rose 6cm from 1990-2010, which was at the absolute top end of the range predicted by IPCC models.
The drought wasn't man made. The dust that came about from it was, due to bad farming practices.
 
Old 11-23-2015, 01:28 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,116,580 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
I don't recall ever using the word "conspiracy" in the AGW context.

Try again.
Bahahaha.... So what's the title of your thread? You obviously don't think scientist can be trusted.... Only the ones that agree with you. You're more transparent than grandmas underwear.
 
Old 11-23-2015, 01:30 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,116,580 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Translation: "Any source that does not support the AGW hoax agenda is anti-science propaganda".

Got it.
Lol. Then how about post data from journals and the agencies, instead of using 3rd party interpretations? Why

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.
 
Old 11-23-2015, 04:34 PM
 
Location: ATX-HOU
10,216 posts, read 8,116,580 times
Reputation: 2037
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
That is correct.

I love it when you provide the CO2 data over the history of the planet and show that CO2 levels used to be 4-5X higher than they are now. Libs just don't seem to have an answer for that.

Further, libs have no answer for why temps increased in the 1930s during the Great Depression, while man-made global CO2 levels plummeted.

Cults reject contrary data and a strict examination of thier beliefs. Science welcomes further questioning.
Lol. How about you plot greenhouse gases over history....
 
Old 11-24-2015, 12:43 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,381,370 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Translation: "Any source that does not support the AGW hoax agenda is anti-science propaganda".

Got it.
No. Any source calling AGW a hoax is anti-science propaganda.
 
Old 11-24-2015, 12:48 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,381,370 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
That is correct.

I love it when you provide the CO2 data over the history of the planet and show that CO2 levels used to be 4-5X higher than they are now. Libs just don't seem to have an answer for that.

Further, libs have no answer for why temps increased in the 1930s during the Great Depression, while man-made global CO2 levels plummeted.

Cults reject contrary data and a strict examination of thier beliefs. Science welcomes further questioning.
So you belong to an anti-science cult? Because you reject science, reject all data and evidence, parrot evidence-free pseudoscience and misinformation, and reject any examination of your beliefs.


If you really want to know about the role of CO2 in earth's climate history (which I know you don't), watch this evidence-based presentation by Prof Richard Alley at the 2015 National Academy of Sciences Symposium. Or do you claim that the NAS and every major Science Institution worldwide is a 'cult'?


Richard Alley - 4.6 Billion Years of Earth’s Climate History: The Role of CO2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujkcTZZlikg


OR: read thousands of published research papers in the Journals.


OR: continue to delude yourself (most likely option).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top