Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Are you serious? What do you not understand about the statement "every single major Science Institution worldwide"? Do you really not know WHY all the major Science Institutions worldwide accept anthropogenic climate change? Because of the long established physics and the overwhelming consilience of evidence presented in tens of thousands of published research papers. I only noted the APS because they just announced that they had recently updated their previous 2007 Statement on Climate Change.
It's like you've never heard of the concept of 'evidence' in science.
I don't recall ever using the word "conspiracy" in the AGW context.
Try again.
"I mean sure, I claimed every government and climate scientist in the world is engaged in a concerted, organized effort to perpetuate a global fabrication, but I never said 'conspiracy!'"
Translation: "Any source that does not support the AGW hoax agenda is anti-science propaganda".
Got it.
That is correct.
I love it when you provide the CO2 data over the history of the planet and show that CO2 levels used to be 4-5X higher than they are now. Libs just don't seem to have an answer for that.
Further, libs have no answer for why temps increased in the 1930s during the Great Depression, while man-made global CO2 levels plummeted.
Cults reject contrary data and a strict examination of thier beliefs. Science welcomes further questioning.
But that 1930s drought was at least partly man-made as well, namely exacerbated by unsustainable farming practices.
To the extent the models have failed, they've largely underestimated how badly the climate has changed. For example, sea level rose 6cm from 1990-2010, which was at the absolute top end of the range predicted by IPCC models.
The drought wasn't man made. The dust that came about from it was, due to bad farming practices.
I don't recall ever using the word "conspiracy" in the AGW context.
Try again.
Bahahaha.... So what's the title of your thread? You obviously don't think scientist can be trusted.... Only the ones that agree with you. You're more transparent than grandmas underwear.
I love it when you provide the CO2 data over the history of the planet and show that CO2 levels used to be 4-5X higher than they are now. Libs just don't seem to have an answer for that.
Further, libs have no answer for why temps increased in the 1930s during the Great Depression, while man-made global CO2 levels plummeted.
Cults reject contrary data and a strict examination of thier beliefs. Science welcomes further questioning.
Lol. How about you plot greenhouse gases over history....
I love it when you provide the CO2 data over the history of the planet and show that CO2 levels used to be 4-5X higher than they are now. Libs just don't seem to have an answer for that.
Further, libs have no answer for why temps increased in the 1930s during the Great Depression, while man-made global CO2 levels plummeted.
Cults reject contrary data and a strict examination of thier beliefs. Science welcomes further questioning.
So you belong to an anti-science cult? Because you reject science, reject all data and evidence, parrot evidence-free pseudoscience and misinformation, and reject any examination of your beliefs.
If you really want to know about the role of CO2 in earth's climate history (which I know you don't), watch this evidence-based presentation by Prof Richard Alley at the 2015 National Academy of Sciences Symposium. Or do you claim that the NAS and every major Science Institution worldwide is a 'cult'?
Richard Alley - 4.6 Billion Years of Earth’s Climate History: The Role of CO2
OR: read thousands of published research papers in the Journals.
OR: continue to delude yourself (most likely option).
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.